Health Talk

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

Misleading Snack?

Misleading Snack?

Frito-Lay chips not "all natural": lawsuit.  Full Article 

Truth about Calories

Truth about Calories

Calories count, but not where they come from: study.  Full Article 

Fighting Diseases

Fighting Diseases

Big Pharma donates drugs for neglected diseases.  Full Article 

De-stressing Room

De-stressing Room

San Francisco airport unveils yoga room for travelers.  Full Article 

Benefits of Soy

Benefits of Soy

Study clouds evidence on soy and menopause.  Full Article 

Sun Damage

Sun Damage

More kids seek tans as they age, may raise skin cancer risk.  Full Article 

Take a Dip

Take a Dip

Swimming lowers older adults' blood pressure.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device  Full Coverage 

Allergy tests useful before implanting devices

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:50am IST

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Patients with an allergy to metal, often first revealed when wearing certain jewelry, are also at risk for reactions to implanted medical devices made of metal, such as pacemakers and orthopedic prostheses.

Patch testing, which involves placing some of the suspected allergen on the skin, can be helpful in detecting medical device reactions. However, doctors need to wait longer than usual when looking to see if a skin reaction has occurred, researchers report in the Archives of Dermatology.

Normally, researcher Dr. Mark D. P. Davis told Reuters Health, readings at days 3 and 5 "are adequate for detecting contact allergy to most of the common allergens." In the case of metal allergy, however, the reaction may be delayed and doctors should look again at days 7 to 10.

In the present study, Davis, from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, and colleagues reviewed the results of 44 patients who were tested for metal allergies and found that testing before the device was implanted helped identify those with allergies. In four out of five patients, detection of the allergy led to a change in the device used.

SOURCE: Archives of Dermatology, August 2008.

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.