• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

Bleak Econ Outlook

Bleak Econ Outlook

More analysts cut India's GDP forecasts.  Full Article 

Rajat Gupta Case

Rajat Gupta Case

Email, wiretaps, at trial link Rajat Gupta to Rajaratnam.  Full Article 

Facebook IPO Fallout

Facebook IPO Fallout

Facebook fallout: Silicon Valley won't snub Morgan Stanley.  Full Article 

Grexit?

Grexit?

Eurozone governments ponder Greek exit contingency.  Full Article 

Diesel Prices

Diesel Prices

Blog: It's time India bites the diesel bullet.  Full Article 

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Stock recommendations from VantageTrade.  Full Coverage 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

INSG sees 2009 nickel market in 80,000 T surplus

LONDON, April 27 | Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:37pm IST

LONDON, April 27 (Reuters) - The global nickel market will be in an 80,000 tonnes surplus in 2009, as falling demand continues to outpace cutbacks made by producers, the International Nickel Study Group (INSG) said.

The Lisbon-based group said it expected world production to fall to 1.26 million tonnes this year and consumption to 1.18 million tonnes.

"No recovery in primary nickel demand and stainless steel production is anticipated until at least the second half of 2009," the INSG said in a statement following a meeting late last week.

Around two-thirds of nickel is used in the production of stainless steel.

In October the group predicted a 110,000 tonnes surplus in nickel this year. Since then a swathe of producers have announced cutbacks in response to poor demand.

The INSG said the 2009 output forecast did not include any adjustment factor for possible production disruptions.

The group said primary nickel output last year was 1.39 million tonnes, down from 1.42 million in 2007.

Global primary nickel usage was 1.29 million in 2008, compared with 1.31 million tonnes in 2007. (Reporting by Karen Norton; editing by Sue Thomas)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.