Syria Crisis

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

Women's Rights

Women's Rights

Afghan parliament fails to pass divisive women's law.  Full Article 

Show of Strength

Show of Strength

North Korea fires three short-range missiles.  Full Article 

Gay Marriage Law

Gay Marriage Law

France the 14th country to legalise gay weddings.  Full Article 

Iraq Violence

Iraq Violence

Two blasts at Iraqi Sunni mosque kill 43.  Full Article 

Lunar Event

Lunar Event

Huge meteoroid strike dazzles scientists.  Video 

Flu Toll

Flu Toll

Death toll from new bird flu in China rises to 36: WHO.  Full Article 

Changing the Topic

Changing the Topic

After tough week, Obama tries to change the subject to jobs.  Full Article 

Trains Collision

Trains Collision

Commuter trains collide in Connecticut, injuring up to 60 people.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

Russia's Muslim south triples sharia bride price

Related Topics

MOSCOW | Wed Jul 7, 2010 6:11pm IST

MOSCOW (Reuters) - The pricetag on a bride in Russia's Ingushetia province has been tripled by the regional government, in a sign the Muslim North Caucasus region is slipping out of Kremlin control as sharia law eclipses Russian.

Against the backdrop of a bubbling Islamist insurgency, the revival of Islam in the North Caucasus following the break-up of the Soviet Union almost 20 years ago has brought sharia law to the region, revered by both rebels and ordinary citizens alike.

The issue of the 'kalym', a price paid by a groom to the family of the woman he chooses to marry, is the latest example of a broader trend that has troubled the Kremlin.

"The increase of the kalym was decided by the residents themselves," the Kremlin-backed leader of Ingushetia, Yunus-Bek Yevkurov, told Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on Tuesday.

At an Ingush conference for Muslim scholars and elders this week, attended by Yevkurov, the money a groom must pay the bride's family for her hand was increased from 12,500 roubles ($401.9) to 40,000 roubles ($1,286), the local government said on official website ingushetia.ru.

"It is time to raise the rates, and with them the responsibility of the groom," a statement on the site said.

Wary of the dangers of separatism after two bloody wars with Chechnya since the mid-1990s, the Kremlin has watched uneasily as central power yields to Islamic tenets in the region.

Polygamy, illegal under Russian law, is encouraged by local authorities in the region. Last month rights workers blamed police for paintball attacks on Chechen women for not wearing headscarves, and Islamist fighters in Ingushetia have gunned down kiosk workers for selling vodka.

During their meeting, Putin looked concerned as he told Yevkurov that the price rise for a bride did not correspond to Russian inflation.

Putin added he was not sure if the practice, widespread in the Caucasus and Central Asia, was Muslim in its nature.

"We have yet to thoroughly examine this," he told Yevkurov.

At this week's Ingush conference, it was also decided to raise ten-fold the price for settling a blood feud, to 1 million roubles ($32,150), with the aim of decreasing the centuries-old practice that is widespread across the North Caucasus.

"Of course, it is better to move away from all this," Putin quipped to Yevkurov after he proudly announced the new price.

One of Russia's most popular newspapers, Moskovsky Komsomolets, splashed the bride price increase on its front page on Wednesday, jocularly headlined "Camel Rate".

"This erodes Russian security. If sharia is higher than the (Russian) constitution, it means that it is alright to kill policemen, soldiers and simply infidels," the paper wrote, referring to the near-daily attacks on law enforcement staged by rebels in the region.

Yevkurov, who narrowly survived a suicide bomb attack on his life last year, is widely seen as a moderate secular leader, unlike Chechen firebrand boss Ramzan Kadyrov.

Kadyrov, a devout Sufi Muslim, has been allowed by the Kremlin to usher in Muslim-inspired rules such as periodic alcohol bans and headscarves in state buildings, in exchange for maintaining a shaky peace in the volatile region.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Jalaluddin wrote:
Interesting, but this article confuses a number of concepts.

-There’s no such thing as a ‘bride price’ in shari’a law, so the headline is straight out wrong. This is a cultural practice which may or may not be shari’a compliant. In shari’a law, there is something called ‘mahr’, which is paid by the groom to the bride herself (not her family) as a form of appreciation and as an assurance of future security. This amount is generally set by the bride herself in accordance with her needs and lifestyle, not by a public authority, so it varies from bride to bride — it can be a small symbolic amount or a large sum. The Wikipedia seems to have good, distinct definitions of ‘bride price’ and ‘mahr’: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahr

-Is it really good journalistic practice to conflate a bunch of disparate issues (the paintball incidents, bride price, gunning down alcohol sellers)? Especially when none of these things are actually endorsed by shari’a law as any half-trained Muslim scholar knows it? The net effect is to turn this word “shari’a” into a scary, irrational, capricious thing in the minds of many. I would agree that there may be a trend of rising faux-fundamentalism and provincialism — a legitimate story — but it’s definitely not a case of ‘creeping sharia’ in any of these cases.

-It would be good journalistic practice to only use the word ’shari’a’ with reference to some religious authority, when that authority can be specified. There isn’t really a monolithic shari’a, so a journalist must specific whose interpretation is in force, if any.

Jul 09, 2010 2:51pm IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.