Muslims angry with Ayodhya verdict, but India calm

NEW DELHI Fri Oct 1, 2010 4:01pm IST

A Hindu priest walks past paramilitary troopers guarding a mosque as Muslims offer Friday prayers in the northern Indian town of Ayodhya October 1, 2010. REUTERS/Mukesh Gupta

A Hindu priest walks past paramilitary troopers guarding a mosque as Muslims offer Friday prayers in the northern Indian town of Ayodhya October 1, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Mukesh Gupta

Related Topics

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Indian Muslim clerics and leaders rallied on Friday against a court ruling over the disputed Ayodhya site that largely favoured Hindus, raising fears of further alienation of the minority community.

A court in Uttar Pradesh said in a judgment on Thursday that the site of a demolished mosque should be split between Hindus and Muslims. The 1992 demolition of the mosque by Hindu mobs triggered some of India's worst riots, killing 2,000 people.

The court ruled Hindus would get two-thirds of the land and be allowed to keep a makeshift temple that was built over the razed mosque's central dome.

The decision has been met with calm throughout India, despite fears the ruling could spark religious riots.

In Delhi's Jama Mosque, one of India's largest, the chief cleric rejected the verdict.

"If we do not get our rights we will never be able to walk in this country with our heads held high," said Shahi Imam Bukhari to shouts of "Allahu Akhbar", or "god is greatest" by thousands of Muslims after Friday prayers.

"It is our responsibility to maintain the peace, but we will not be broken, we cannot be broken. If the Supreme Court endorses the High Court's decision, I will urge all Muslims to consider the matter with all seriousness and concern."

But there were no reports of protests in Muslim-dominated areas, partly because people remained wary of inflaming public tensions in a country where Muslims account for only 13 percent of the 1.2 billion plus population.

Muslim groups said reaction was also measured because they still hoped to appeal in Supreme Court and rebuild the mosque.


India is officially a secular nation and its top women's tennis star, its vice president and one of its richest men are all Muslims, as are some Bollywood stars and top ministers.

But such high-profile success stories often mask the real status of Indian Muslims, who are some of the poorest communities in the country. Since Partition in 1947 amid sectarian violence there have been periodic riots between Hindus and Muslims.

Alienation of Muslims has partly been fuelled by communal riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, when around 2,500 people, mostly Muslims, were hacked or burned to death. Little has been done to catch the culprits despite a national outcry.

Muslims account for fewer than 7 percent of public service employees, only 5 percent of railway workers and there are only about 30,000 Muslims in India's 1.3 million-strong military.

Some fear the mosque verdict may yet turn into a recruitment tool for home-grown Islamist militants who have been blamed for a series of bomb attacks in Indian cities in recent years.

"There will always be few a hotheads who will try to exploit this verdict," said Amulya Ganguly, a leading political commentator based in New Delhi.

Thousands of police maintained calm in the cities of Lucknow and Hyderabad with sizeable Muslim populations. In Kashmir, where rioting broke out last month over reports of alleged desecration of the Koran in the United States, no protests were reported.

Kashmir's main hardline Muslim leader Syed Ali Shah Geelai said the verdict "is hurting Muslims throughout the world".

"To convert a mosque into a temple or something else is intolerable to the Muslim community," he told reporters.

But analysts say India has moved on from 1992 -- then just a year into the economic reforms that saw the rise of a new middle class -- which explains the muted reaction from both sides.

It may also explain the sober approach of the main opposition Hindu-nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, in contrast to 18 years ago when its then-leader L.K. Advani led Hindus on a pilgrimage to tear down the mosque.

Hindus and Muslims have quarrelled for more than a century over the history of the Babri mosque.

Hindus claim that the mosque stands on the birthplace of their god-king Rama, and was built after the destruction of a Hindu temple by a Muslim invader in the 16th century.

(Additional reporting by Alka Pande in LUCKNOW and Sheikh Mushtaq in KASHMIR; Editing by Alistair Scrutton and Alex Richardson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
meghavi wrote:
Such a biased report was very unexpected from media of good repute! This sounds like a report with an intention to incite people. Hindus were given 2/3rd of the land for a reason! Where is that mentioned here? This is an absolutely un-researched article and is NOT news. It is a opinion piece!

Please add a disclaimer stating that this article contains only opinions and is not based on FACTS!

Oct 01, 2010 4:55pm IST  --  Report as abuse
nvdemat wrote:
Reuters should stop this kind of fueling to the conflicts and trying to ignite the problems among the religions. Most of the people (nearly 99% both hindu and muslim) have accepted this verdict and the people want to live in peace. Please stop igniting kind of activities and its clear to see these in your reports of the sensitive issues. Please stop.

Oct 01, 2010 5:53pm IST  --  Report as abuse
ravaladitya wrote:
shameful and biased report from ure news agency. Such stuff was not expected, as the news/story would be built upon facts, which have not been quoted; either out of negligence or deliberately.

Oct 01, 2010 11:37pm IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Maritime Piracy


Wilful Negligence?

Wilful Negligence?

SEBI piles pressure on Sahara to sell overseas hotels  Full Article 

Ban On E-cigarettes

Ban On E-cigarettes

Govt considers ban on e-cigarettes, sale of single smokes  Full Article 

Fighting Ebola

Fighting Ebola

China to send elite army unit to help fight Ebola in Liberia  Full Article 

Siege Of Kobani

Siege Of Kobani

Air strikes hit Kobani as Kurdish peshmerga prepare to enter  Full Article 

Sri Lankan Landslide

Sri Lankan Landslide

Rains slow Sri Lankan landslide search; nearly 150 feared dead  Full Article 

Myanmar's Peace Talks

Myanmar's Peace Talks

Myanmar's leaders seek to revive peace talks, maintain reforms   Full Article 

A Minute With

A Minute With

Bollywood's Kalki Koechlin on playing disabled teen.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage