• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

Bleak Econ Outlook

Bleak Econ Outlook

More analysts cut India's GDP forecasts.  Full Article 

Rajat Gupta Case

Rajat Gupta Case

Email, wiretaps, at trial link Rajat Gupta to Rajaratnam.  Full Article 

Facebook IPO Fallout

Facebook IPO Fallout

Facebook fallout: Silicon Valley won't snub Morgan Stanley.  Full Article 

Grexit?

Grexit?

Eurozone governments ponder Greek exit contingency.  Full Article 

Diesel Prices

Diesel Prices

Blog: It's time India bites the diesel bullet.  Full Article 

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Stock recommendations from VantageTrade.  Full Coverage 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

India's IT aims to soften image as Obama visits

Related Topics

Employees at a call centre provide service support to international customers, in Bangalore March 17, 2004. REUTERS/Sherwin Crasto/Files

Employees at a call centre provide service support to international customers, in Bangalore March 17, 2004.

Credit: Reuters/Sherwin Crasto/Files

MUMBAI/SAN FRANCISCO | Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:23pm IST

MUMBAI/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama's visit to India puts the spotlight on its $60 billion IT sector, which argues it is a creator of jobs in the United States and should not be blamed for high unemployment.

An increase in U.S. visa fees, a ban on offshoring by the state of Ohio and the industry's portrayal in campaign ads as a drain of U.S. jobs has set a frosty tone ahead of Obama's visit to India in early November.

Obama is expected to visit Mumbai, India's financial hub and the centre of the 2008 militant attacks. U.S. officials say much of the trip's focus will be boosting trade that is expected to double in five years from the current level of $50 billion.

But it is a sign of the times that Obama is not expected to visit Bangalore, the country's technology hub. Nor is he expected to visit Hyderabad, another Indian IT hotbed, where his predecessor, George W. Bush, stopped in a 2006 visit.

"It is a worry, there's no question, but the worry is more about unemployment, not about the political rhetoric," said Pramod Bhasin, chief executive of outsourcer Genpact Ltd.

"We as an industry have to help create jobs in America and we have to communicate that much better than we've done in the past," said Bhasin, whose firm employs about 2,000 in the United States and expects to double or triple that over the next two to three years. Three-quarters of Genpact staff are in India.

Obama's fellow Democrats are expected to take a drubbing in the Nov. 2 balloting amid unemployment stuck near 10 percent.

In California, where the jobless rate tops 12 percent, Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer accuses her Republican rival Carly Fiorina of sending jobs abroad when she was chief of Hewlett-Packard.

Legislation that would end tax breaks for firms that create jobs and profits overseas was thwarted in the Senate, but a new rule raising the cost of certain visas to enter the United States, part of a border security bill, will cost Indian IT firms $200 million and sets an ominous precedent for the industry.

"It has nothing to do with immigration, but it has had an impact on the costs of IT services companies from India. That is the kind of legislation that worries us," said S Gopalakrishnan, CEO of sector bellwether Infosys Technologies Ltd.

SUCCESS VICTIM

India's IT services industry, which generates 70 percent of its revenue from the United States and accounts for 5 percent of India's economy, is a victim of its own success.

Before the global economic downturn, the sector was growing by roughly one-third per year as companies across industries shipped commoditised work to India and elsewhere to cut costs.

U.S. blue chips from Intel and Google to Cisco and Microsoft have substantial operations in India, which is increasingly a research hub for Silicon Valley. IBM alone is believed to employ more than 70,000 in India, although it would not confirm that figure.

While China's emergence as an industrial powerhouse has spawned U.S. backlash over lost manufacturing jobs and a weak currency that keeps exports cheap, India is associated with armies of young engineers and service staff working for one-fifth to one-third the wages of American white collar workers.

For India, the IT boom has created a world-leading industry that has been culturally transformative in a tradition-rich country, employing two million people working in modern offices and buying cars and apartments.

Outsourcers say they enable clients to innovate and compete, providing skills not readily available in the United States.

"There is a huge dearth of software engineers in the U.S., and a large part has been mitigated by offshore work," said Aparup Sengupta, managing director and global chief executive of Aegis Ltd, an IT services firm owned by the Essar conglomerate.

The perception within the United States is often less benign.

In an episode of "Outsourced," a new U.S. comedy TV show, bricks are thrown through the window of an American call center that has transferred its work to India.

JOB CREATION

Indian IT industry players say they are not to blame for U.S. job losses, and instead talk up creation of jobs both directly and indirectly in the United States.

"Job losses are not due to outsourcing. They're due to subprime, they're due to the financial mess, they're due to lots of other things," said Bhasin of Genpact, which this year bought an operation in Illinois from Walgreens as part of a deal to provide accounting services for the drugstore chain.

Outsourcing work to a lower-cost U.S. site can save roughly 20-25 percent, while moving work to India saves 70 to 80 percent.

Last year, Infosys announced a plan to hire 1,000 employees in the United States and said it has made nearly 300 job offers since then. Of 122,000 Infosys staff, over 2,000 are U.S.-based.

"We think there are perceptions and myths today, and these need to be corrected, because it's not about jobs moving to India, its about our creating jobs there," said Som Mittal, president of Nasscom, the trade body for the Indian tech sector.

Anti-outsourcing talk may cool after next week's elections but could reemerge with greater intensity in the run-up to 2012, when Obama will be up for re-election.

"In February, no one is going to be talking about India," said Derek Scissors, a research fellow in the Asian Studies Center at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank in Washington. "But what about 2012? That's a different story."

(Additional reporting by Bharghavi Nagaraju in BANGALORE; Editing by Alistair Scrutton and Sanjeev Miglani)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (21)
Paattrick wrote:
I was out of touch for a while in 2008 in the wilds of Outer Mongolia collecting data on the life and times of Genghis Kahn. These “militant attacks” who were the perpetrators? Probably right wing radicals from the US. Or perhaps the IRA, those nasty little buggers. A cabal of Buddhist monks! What about the ever present fall guys the Israelis? Although I’m sure there are other candidates but nothing comes to mind. I am certain had it been one of these organizations you would have identified them in bold and linked to a wiki definition. I guess I need to proceed to an actual news sight to discover the identity of this despicable militant group.

10 27, 2010 7:05pm IST  --  Report as abuse
Constitution1st wrote:
Now if we could only get Ă˜bama to accept a job there…

10 27, 2010 8:18pm IST  --  Report as abuse
dareisay wrote:
Yes, outsourcing is bad for the US!

10 27, 2010 8:38pm IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.