Afghan leader warns NATO not to become "occupying force"

KABUL Tue May 31, 2011 4:04pm IST

File photo of Afghan President Hamid Karzai as he speaks during his visit to the Civil Service Institute in Kabul August 7, 2010. REUTERS/Omar Sobhani/Files

File photo of Afghan President Hamid Karzai as he speaks during his visit to the Civil Service Institute in Kabul August 7, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Omar Sobhani/Files

Related Topics

Election 2014

Election 2014

More than 814 million people — a number larger than the population of Europe — are eligible to vote in the world’s biggest democratic exercise.  Full Coverage 

KABUL (Reuters) - President Hamid Karzai warned NATO-led forces in Afghanistan on Tuesday that they were at risk of being seen as an occupying force rather than an ally after a spate of civilian casualties, and said he would take unspecified "action" if they continue.

Raids on Afghan homes in pursuit of insurgents were "not allowed", and the patience of the Afghan people with the tactic had run out, Karzai said, underlining the challenge of winning popular support for an increasingly violent war.

"We see NATO from the point of view of an ally... If they don't stop air strikes on Afghan homes, their presence in Afghanistan will be considered as an occupying force and against the will of the Afghan people," he told reporters.

The fiery speech also underlined Karzai's desire to forge an image as champion of Afghanistan and distance himself from the Western troops who have spent nearly a decade fighting the Taliban, as resentment against the foreign presence grows.

Karzai's rise to power in Afghanistan after the fall of the Taliban was due in no small part to Western support, something which his critics have not forgotten.

Karzai sharply condemned NATO air strikes which inadvertently killed at least nine people -- most of them small children -- in southern Helmand on Sunday. The strikes were ordered after a patrol had come under fire.

Civilian casualties caused by foreign troops, usually in air strikes or night raids on Afghan, have long been a major source of friction between Karzai and his Western backers.

Karzai warned that the tactics were a violation of Afghanistan's sovereignty.

"They must stop bombarding Afghan homes... If they do not, the Afghan government will be forced to take unilateral action," Karzai said, declining to go into detail about what his government would do if the tactics were not stopped.


Holding up one finger, Karzai said he had warned NATO commanders "a hundred times" over the matter, and hoped to meet them again this week to reinforce that message.

But with an army and police still not strong enough to fight the battle-hardened Taliban on their own, it was unclear how Karzai hoped to persuade NATO to give up a tactic they say has brought crucial gains against the insurgents.

"If more civilian deaths happen, maybe Karzai will actually do something, such as stopping Afghan forces from participating in joint operations," said Waheed Mujhda, political analyst at the Afghan Analytical and Advisory Centre in Kabul.

"But this is dangerous. Afghanistan is in crisis and the Afghan forces do not have the capacity to run things on their own," Mujhda told Reuters.

NATO is racing against the clock to train Afghanistan's police and army before handing over all security responsibilities to the Afghans by end-2014.


Tension boiled over at the weekend after the strikes on a compound in Helmand's Nawzad district. Graphic television footage after the strikes showed grieving relatives cradling the bodies of several children, including babies.

The commander of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in southwestern Afghanistan later apologised for the deaths, saying the strikes on the compound had been ordered because insurgents were using them as a base. Relatives of the dead denied the claims.

U.S. and NATO commanders have stepped up the use of air strikes and night raids in the past 12 months, arguing they are effective weapons against insurgents who often hide among the Afghan population.

However commanders have significantly tightened the rules for using both tactics over the past two years amid a growing outcry from Afghan leaders.

U.N. figures show that at least three-quarters of civilians casualties are caused by insurgents but it is those by NATO forces which cause the most public anger among ordinary Afghans.

The latest NATO strikes came at a time of high anti-Western sentiment in Afghanistan, and weeks ahead of the first stage of a security transition from foreign forces to Afghans due to begin in several areas in July.

The argument over air strikes and night raids also comes at a time of heightened violence across the country since the Taliban began their spring offensive at the start of May.

(Writing by Paul Tait and Amie Ferris-Rotman; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared


Exit Door

Exit Door

Japan's NTT DoCoMo to exit India telecoms joint venture - sources.  Full Article 

New Nokia Head

New Nokia Head

Nokia to name Rajeev Suri as next CEO on Tuesday - report.  Full Article 

Good Impression

Good Impression

New Microsoft CEO Nadella impresses Wall Street, stresses challenges.  Full Article 

Paucity of Rains

Patchy Rain

Met office rules out surplus monsoon in 2014   Full Article 

FB Newswire

FB Newswire

Facebook courts journalists with newswire tool.  Full Article 

Times Top List

Time 100

Janet Yellen, Miley Cyrus odd bedfellows in Time's list of 100 most influential.  Full Article 

Boat Tragedy

Boat Tragedy

From to photography, Korea ferry founder has diverse interests.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage