UPDATE 1-U.S. EPA seen delaying rules on greenhouse gases
* Delay of about a month seen
* EPA says has nothing to announce (Adds details on regulations, companies potentially affected)
By Timothy Gardner
WASHINGTON, June 3 (Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under the gun from Republicans and struggling with an ambitious agenda, will likely delay by a month proposing rules to cut greenhouse gas emissions from the country's major utilities, sources said.
"We would not be surprised if it does not come out at the end of July, if it slips by a month or so," said a source at an environmental think tank, who works with states and federal agencies and wished to remain anonymous.
The EPA said late last year it would propose rules on constraining greenhouse gas emissions from power plants -- known as performance standards -- in July. It plans to propose similar rules on oil refineries in December.
The rules will likely give polluters flexibility to cut emissions by participating in existing or planned regional cap-and-trade markets, for example, or by switching from coal to cleaner-burning natural gas.
Large coal burners such as American Electric Power (AEP.N), Southern Co (SO.N) and Duke Energy (DUK.N) would be most affected by the rules, and forced to cut emissions blamed for warming the planet or face penalties.
The timing of the EPA rules is important because President Barack Obama has pledged to reduce U.S. emissions by about 17 percent by 2020 compared to 2005 levels.
The position has been criticized as inadequate at the stalled world climate talks and U.S. emissions could rise quickly if the economic recovery speeds up.
Because Congress failed last year to pass a climate bill, the Obama administration has been relying on the EPA to spur reductions in carbon emissions. The EPA began rolling out its rules on the biggest polluters at the start of the year.
As a result, the EPA has taken on its heaviest load in years and is struggling with a number of delays.
A rule on ozone pollution, which is hazardous to health, has already been delayed several times. In May the EPA delayed indefinitely the finalization of rules on pollutants, such as mercury and soot, from industrial boilers that were supposed to be implemented in coming years.
In the fall, the EPA plans to issue rules on greater efficiency for vehicles.
NOTHING TO ANNOUNCE
Ahead of next year's presidential and congressional elections, Republicans in the House of Representatives have been trying to stop the agency from moving ahead on the rules, saying the regulations will boost energy costs and hurt jobs by driving businesses overseas.
Some Democrats facing tight races next year in the Senate have also pushed to delay the EPA's rules or stop it entirely.
The EPA would not say whether it was considering a delay. "We don't have anything to announce on this," an EPA spokesman said in an email.
Environmentalists were watching the EPA closely to see if politics entered into the decision. "We would be concerned but not devastated" about a delay of a month or so, because the EPA's workload is so heavy right now, said Frank O'Donnell, the president of Clean Air Watch.
But he said heavy opposition from Republicans and industry had already led the EPA to delay rules on ozone and other air pollution issues, so a delay of longer than a few months on greenhouse gases would be worrisome.
Many in the energy industry say now is not the right time for greenhouse gas rules. Power industry lobbyist Scott Segal, of Bracewell & Giuliani, said that complying with the greenhouse gas rules, combined with other rules on pollutants, could affect the reliability of the electric grid.
It was unclear whether a delay in the proposal of the greenhouse gases rules would affect when they would be finalized. The EPA said in December that greenhouse gas standards on power plants would be finalized in May 2012 and on oil refineries in November 2012. (Editing by Marguerita Choy and Dale Hudson)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


Follow Reuters