Breakingviews-Bank of Moscow exposes Russian regulatory void

Tue Jul 5, 2011 2:31pm IST

Stocks

   

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own)

By Jason Bush

MOSCOW, July 5 (Reuters Breakingviews)- The $14 billion rescue of Bank of Moscow shows that something must be badly wrong with bank supervision in Russia. The bailout amounts to almost half the assets of the country’s fifth largest bank. Reforms are urgently needed. But new laws alone won’t eradicate the cronyist culture at the root of the mess.

Officials say the record bailout is needed because the ex-management of Andrei Borodin, an ally of disgraced Moscow mayor Yuri Luzhkov, blew billions of dollars by lending it to companies affiliated with management – or simply siphoned it offshore. Borodin now lives in exile in London. While the scale of the losses is astonishing even by Russian standards, the underlying causes are not. The debacle comes just months after the collapse of another politically-connected bank, mid-sized International Industrial Bank, exposed similar lapses in regulatory oversight. In typically complacent fashion, most analysts dismissed that bank’s collapse as a one-off.

In fact, the risky related-party lending in which both banks engaged is commonplace. Last year, ratings agency Moody’s estimated such loans at around 10 percent of the sector total and 50 percent of bank capital. This is allowed by current Russian regulations, and is twice as high as what’s practiced in the Middle East, or five times higher than in Central Europe. One obvious lesson is that Russia needs to introduce tighter restrictions on such lending. Loans to related parties are typically restricted to 20-30 percent of tier one capital in western Europe.

The debacle also underscores the urgency of proposed new rules that would give the central bank greater powers to investigate companies that are affiliated to banks, and make bank shareholders liable in the event of asset stripping.

But new rules will mean little unless they are enforced. This will long be the main problem in Russia. Russian bank failures usually have political causes: well-connected banks often have more clout than regulators. In this respect, the recent expansion of state banking giants, such as Kremlin favourite VTB, may ultimately make matters worse. Russia's latest banking fiasco is unlikely to be the last.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Get Breakingviews alerts directly to your inbox three times a day. To sign up click here: here

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

CONTEXT NEWS

-- Russian officials announced on July 1 that Bank of Moscow (MMBM.MM) would receive a $14 billion bailout, after a hostile takeover bid by VTB (VTBR.MM) revealed a large hole in the books of Russia's fifth largest bank. The head of Russia’s Deposit Insurance Agency said Bank of Moscow’ problem loans were estimated at $9 billion, including $5.4 billion that were “bad” and unlikely to be recovered.

-- Under the bailout, the central bank will fund a 10-year loan of 295 billion roubles ($10.6 billion) to Bank of Moscow from the Deposit Insurance Agency at a rate of 0.51 percent. State-controlled VTB, Russia's second-largest bank, will contribute 100 billion roubles to recapitalise Bank of Moscow.

-- Reuters story: Accusations fly as Bank of Moscow gets record bailout [ID:nLDE7600ED]

RELATED COLUMN

Asleep at the wheel [ID:nLDE6AE0NG]

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own)

-- For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can click on [BUSH/]

(Editing by Pierre Briançon and David Evans)

((jason.bush@thomsonreuters.com)) Keywords: BREAKINGVIEWS BANKOFMOSCOW/