Credit ratings love-hate has simple answer

NEW YORK Sun Aug 7, 2011 9:50am IST

The Standard and Poor's building in New York, August 2, 2011.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

The Standard and Poor's building in New York, August 2, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters Breakingviews) - It's a love-hate relationship. The White House doesn't like the fact that Standard & Poor's downgraded America's debt on Friday -- it even picked holes in the firm's numbers. European officials don't welcome critiques of sovereign credit, either. Yet governments seem broadly inclined to regulate rating firms tightly. The better answer is to cut them loose.

Without official recognition, the powerful big three raters -- S&P, Moody's Investors Service and Fitch Ratings -- would eventually become just competitors with other credit researchers. Investors would have to decide whose analysis was most credible. They could ignore S&P if they chose, or discount all three firms' views because of their many failures to spot early warning signs ahead of the 2008 crisis and look elsewhere for insight.

Last year's Dodd-Frank Act started a process of de-deifying the troika, requiring the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to find alternatives to the use of credit ratings in regulations. The SEC did just that in one area on July 26, specifying alternative criteria that qualify a debt issuer to use "short form" disclosure for new offerings.

At the same time, Dodd-Frank also requires the SEC to intensify its oversight of officially recognized rating firms. European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso last month also talked about tighter regulation. He even hinted at encouraging homegrown rivals to counter a perceived anti-European bias (apparently forgetting that Fitch is majority-owned by France's Fimalac).

More pervasively, global Basel III rules on bank capital still have ratings baked in. It's not easy to find a straightforward alternative, but it shouldn't be beyond the imagination of bankers and watchdogs. Traditional ratings anyway carry far too much weight given their narrow primary purpose as indicators of default probability. A multifaceted approach would bring better risk management. The trouble is, even investors with the resources and skill to perform their own credit analysis often like ratings because they provide a framework for arbitrage.

Moody's supports removing ratings from regulations, according to the firm's July 27 congressional testimony. Another witness, Lawrence White of New York University's Stern School of Business, made the case for dismantling regulation of the raters. Perhaps the White House's spat with S&P will clarify minds. Governments don't need to hold these particular enemies close or worry about their mistakes: they should just release them to fight for influence on their merits.

(Editing by Rob Cox and Martin Langfield)

FILED UNDER:

Fast-tracking Projects

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Oil Prices

Oil Prices

Oil resumes slide after brief rebound on short-covering.  Full Article 

Space Programme

Space Programme

ISRO tests its heaviest space launch vehicle, eyes global market   Full Article 

Coal India Strike

Coal India Strike

Coal India workers threaten five-day strike, stokes output worries  Full Article 

Gold Discount

Gold Discount

Dealers offer gold discount for first time in five months  Full Article 

Lakhvi Granted Bail

Lakhvi Granted Bail

Pakistan court bails man accused of masterminding Mumbai attack  Full Article 

GST Bill

GST Bill

Cabinet clears bill for nationwide goods and services tax.  Full Article 

Aviation Sector

Aviation Sector

Breakingviews: SpiceJet rescue is no fix for India aviation woes.  Full Article 

Global Economy

Global Economy

Fed confident on U.S. growth, opens door wider to rate hike.  Full Article 

Reuters Poll

Reuters Poll

BSE Sensex to hit 32,980 by December 2015  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device  Full Coverage