Politics

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

India-Afghanistan Relations

India-Afghanistan Relations

Afghanistan's Karzai seeks Indian military aid amid tensions with Pakistan.  Full Article 

Prized Stake

Prized Stake

All eyes on Vodafone's Colao for signs on Verizon.  Full Article 

Pakistan Politics

Pakistan Politics

Upmarket Pakistan district votes again as Imran Khan decries killing.  Full Article 

Farewell Beckham

Farewell Beckham

Beckham tears and Ibrahimovic joy as PSG triumph.  Full Article 

Syria Talks

Syria Talks

Syria's Assad: Little chance peace talks would succeed - newspaper.  Full Article 

At Cannes

At Cannes

Shots fired at Cannes film festival, actors flee for cover.  Article | Jewellery stolen 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

Pakistani PM Gilani hits back at U.S. accusations

Related Topics

Pakistan's Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani meets with the U.S. delegation including U.S. Senator John Kerry (D-MA) during their visit to Islamabad at the prime minister's residence May 16, 2011. REUTERS/Mian Khursheed/Files

Pakistan's Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani meets with the U.S. delegation including U.S. Senator John Kerry (D-MA) during their visit to Islamabad at the prime minister's residence May 16, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Mian Khursheed/Files

ISLAMABAD | Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:56am IST

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Pakistan shot back on Saturday at U.S. allegations that its powerful spy agency supports the Haqqani militant group fighting coalition troops in Afghanistan, describing them as a sign of American "confusion and policy disarray".

"We strongly reject assertions of complicity with the Haqqanis or of proxy war," Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani said, breaking off from a speech to aid agencies and foreign diplomats on the country's flood disaster.

He was responding to comments on Thursday by outgoing chairman of the U.S. joint chiefs of staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, who said Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI) was linked to militant groups who carried out the Sept. 13 attack on the U.S. embassy in Kabul.

"The allegations betray a confusion and policy disarray within the U.S. establishment on the way forward in Afghanistan," Gilani said in his address, delivered at an Islamabad hotel that was the target of a suicide truck bombing in 2008 that killed at least 54 people.

"The propaganda blitz against Pakistan is indeed most unfortunate. It vitiates the atmosphere and is counter-productive. It tends to ignore the sacrifices by the people of Pakistan and negates all that we have endeavoured to achieve over the last so many years."

Although Pakistan officially abandoned support for the Taliban after the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States in 2001 and allied itself with Washington's "war on terror", analysts say elements of the ISI refused to make the doctrinal shift.

Mullen bluntly described the Haqqani militant network, the most violent and effective faction among Islamist Taliban militants in Afghanistan, as a "veritable arm" of the ISI, and accused Pakistan of providing support for the Kabul attack.

It was the most serious allegation levelled by Washington against the nuclear-armed South Asian nation since 2001, and the first time it had held Islamabad responsible for an attack against the United States.

Gilani's foreign minister told Washington on Friday that it risked losing an ally if it kept accusing Islamabad of playing a double game in the war against militancy, and was escalating a crisis in ties triggered by U.S. forces' killing of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan in an unannounced raid in May.

"Pakistan cannot be held responsible for the security of U.S./NATO/ISAF forces in Afghanistan," Gilani said. "It is as much the responsibility of the Afghan National Army, NATO and ISAF not to allow such cross-border militancy."

"Joint operations and coordination are essential. Let's be objective and not get carried away by emotions."

(Editing by Chris Allbritton)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.