India govt backs case against internet giants

NEW DELHI Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:21am IST

A Google search page is seen through the spectacles of a computer user in Leicester, central England July 20, 2007. REUTERS/Darren Staples/Files

A Google search page is seen through the spectacles of a computer user in Leicester, central England July 20, 2007.

Credit: Reuters/Darren Staples/Files

Stocks

   

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The Indian government on Friday threw its weight behind a case against internet giants including Google and Facebook, who are embroiled in a battle over offensive content after a judge warned websites may be blocked "like in China".

The case, which has stoked worries about freedom of speech in the world's largest democracy, was brought by a private petitioner seeking to remove images considered offensive to Hindus, Muslims and Christians from websites.

The government on Friday officially sanctioned prosecuting 21 companies including Google (GOOG.O) and Facebook.

"The government of India...finds it appropriate to grant sanction...to proceed against the accused persons in the aforesaid complaint in national harmony, integration and national interest," a court document seen by Reuters said.

The next hearing was set for March and senior executives could be summoned, local media said.

Separately, the Delhi High Court is due to resume a hearing on Monday of an appeal against the case, which was originally brought in a lower court.

"The lower court gave a ruling asking the companies to take down some content, we appealed that ruling and it is in the higher court," said a Google spokesman in India on Friday.

The India units of Facebook, Yahoo! Inc (YHOO.O) and Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O) declined to comment.

"If a contraband is found in your house, it (is) your liability to take action against it," High Court Justice Suresh Kait told lawyers from Facebook India and Google India on Thursday, according to the Economic Times newspaper.

"Like China, we can block all such websites (that don't comply). But let us not go to that situation."

A law passed last year in India makes companies responsible for user content posted on their websites, requiring them to take it down within 36 hours in case of a complaint. The lower court affirmed the law last week.

Less than 10 percent of India's 1.2 billion people have Internet access, though the connected population is rapidly growing through social media tools on mobile phones, bringing many into contact for the first time with images intended to offend.

More than 880 million people have mobile phones in India, but more expensive Internet-capable 3G models are out of reach for many.

Civil rights groups opposed the laws, but politicians say that posting offensive images in the socially conservative country with a history of violence between religious groups presents a danger to the public as Internet use grows.

In December, Telecoms Minister Kapil Sibal weighed into the debate, urging Facebook, Twitter, Google and others to remove offensive material.

Despite rules to remove offensive content, India's Internet access is still largely free when compared with the tight controls in fellow Asian economic powerhouse China.

(Addtional reporting by Devidutta Tripathy; Editing by Matthias Williams and Ed Lane)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Mindshare wrote:
Can someone ask how this Justice Suresh Kait owns 2 MIG flats in North Delhi DDA scheme (he claims it is before his appointment as HC Judge) & 1 HIG flat in South Delhi DDA scheme (he claims it is before his appointment as HC Judge), when the Terms & Conditions state that the applicant must not own any residential flat or plot in full or in part on lease hold or free hold basis in Delhi/ New Delhi/ Delhi Cantonment either in his/ her own name or in the name of his/her wife / husband or in the name of his / her minor or dependent children. Guess what this is the power of Google where I got this information from & exactly this is what they want to control in the name of curbing objectionable material.

Jan 13, 2012 6:32pm IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

India-WTO Standoff

India-WTO Standoff

India threatens to derail WTO deal, prompts angry U.S. rebuke  Full Article 

Economic Pulse

Economic Pulse

New govt promises low and stable tax regime for economic revival.  Full Article 

IPO Probe Ends

IPO Probe Ends

Facebook says SEC's IPO probe ends, extending WhatsApp closing date  Full Article 

World Stocks

World Stocks

Goldman Sachs downgrades stocks to neutral for short term  Full Article 

Disappointing Results

Disappointing Results

Amazon's far-reaching ambitions, lack of profits, unnerve investors  Full Article 

Global Growth

Global Growth

IMF cuts outlook, warns of stagnation risk in rich nations  Full Article 

Market Eye

Market Eye

Nifty retreats from record highs on profit taking.  Full Article 

Waning Enthusiasm

Waning Enthusiasm

Markets' post-election enthusiasm lost on consumers.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage