CEO Fired

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Rate Cut Hopes

Rate Cut Hopes

BarCap expects bigger rate cuts in India in 2013.  Full Article 

Rupee Low

Rupee Low

Rupee hits 2013 low on importer demand, weak euro  Full Article | Related Story 

Vodafone Result

Vodafone Result

Vodafone keeps Verizon payout to make up for European slump  Full Article 

Tumble Bought

Tumble Bought

Yahoo's rise in Asia offsets risk from Tumblr bet  Full Article 

Bond Business

Bond Business

RBI says foreign investors may buy inflation-linked bonds  Full Article | Related Story 

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Confused while buying stocks? Get buy, sell or hold recommendations from VantageTrade.  Full Coverage 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

BREAKINGVIEWS - Sahara's judgement day beckons for 23 mln savers

Related Topics

Track BSE Sectoral Indices

Track Markets: BSE Sectoral Indices

Track and analyse performance of all BSE sectoral indices and other global indices on a single page.   Full Coverage 

A view of the Supreme Court building is seen in New Delhi December 7, 2010. REUTERS/B Mathur/Files

A view of the Supreme Court building is seen in New Delhi December 7, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/B Mathur/Files

Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:53pm IST

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own)

By Jeff Glekin

MUMBAI (Reuters Breakingviews) - There's a lot riding on the $5.5 billion case against Sahara group which reaches the Supreme Court this week. Regardless of who actually comes out top, the amount of cash raised from 23 million mostly rural investors means confidence in India's financial system is at stake.

In 2008, two unlisted Sahara group companies, with paid up capital of less than $20,000 each, began raising funds through a complex instrument known as an optionally fully convertible debenture. Between them they raised at least $3.7 billion. Sahara argues the fundraising was in the form of a private placement. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) countered that a private placement should be for a maximum of 50 investors -- not 23 million. Sahara declined to comment while the case was still in pending with the Supreme Court.

The sums raised by the politically well-connected Sahara group exceed the amount raised by India's largest ever IPO, that of Coal India. Its largely rural investors exceed the total number of retail investors for India's entire universe of listed stocks. Most of Sahara investors are poor. If something has gone amiss, the political and economic fallout will be immense.

The case has already courted controversy. In June last year, a letter to the prime minister from SEBI's outgoing second-in-command alleged that the finance ministry had put pressure on the new SEBI Chairman in relation to the Sahara case. The finance ministry denies the allegation.

Even if Sahara wins its Supreme Court action, questions will remain over the regulatory environment. In particular, how could so many investors be sold a product that benefits from neither the protection associated with a public issue nor the safeguards a depositor would get from putting money in a bank? If Sahara loses, the questions over how such a huge mobilisation of funds was allowed to take place at all will be even more searching. And, of course, there will be the small matter of making sure that Sahara's investors get their money back swiftly.

CONTEXT NEWS

-- The Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Sahara group on January 20. Sahara is challenging India's security market regulator's order of June 2011 for it to return around $5.5 billion to at least 23 million mostly rural investors.

-- The Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) charged Sahara with raising funds from the public without proper disclosures and adherence to investor protection norms. It stopped the company from raising funds through India's capital markets until repayments were made to the investors. The Securities Appellate Tribunal upheld SEBI's order in October 2011.

-- The privately-owned Sahara group has interests in finance, infrastructure, housing, media, entertainment and sports. It is the main sponsor of the Indian cricket team.

(Editing by Hugo Dixon and David Evans)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Annbou wrote:
certainly the flaw comes from the lack of regulation and scrutiny by the SEBI, but the major fault is that of a “pure stealing attempt” by financially expert persons of a well settled group, on a target of “vulnerable” “investors”.
There is enough matter for imprisonment penalty, and a quick return of money to those 23 Million “investors”(of an average 10.000 Rupees!!!).
looks like the kind of joke from bollywoodian inspiration.

Jan 19, 2012 5:50pm IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.