• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

India Growth

India Growth

India Q4 GDP seen slowing to 6 pct, says StanChart.  Full Article 

HP Job Cuts

HP Job Cuts

HP to lay off about 27,000, profit slides 31 pct.  Full Article 

Aiming To Crack China

Aiming To Crack China

India's Mahindra taps Korean arm to push brand in world's largest auto market  Full Article 

Profit from Facebook

Profit from Facebook

Morgan Stanley, others make $100 mln profit on Facebook trades, according to reports.  Full Article 

Factories Take a Hit

Factories Take a Hit

China May factory activity turns down, according to HSBC Flash PMI.  Full Article 

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Stock recommendations from VantageTrade.  Full Coverage 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

BREAKINGVIEWS - A CEO's phone mannerisms can reveal fibs

Related Topics

Stocks

   
Businessman sit on a bench in a downtown business district of Tokyo June 15, 2010. REUTERS/Issei Kato/Files

Businessman sit on a bench in a downtown business district of Tokyo June 15, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Issei Kato/Files

Wed Feb 8, 2012 12:10am IST

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

By Reynolds Holding

NEW YORK (Reuters Breakingviews) - A chief executive's phone manner can reveal fibs about company results. All it takes is a shaky delivery or uneven tone during an earnings call, new research suggests. They are among the tip-offs that a boss is being economical with the truth. The evidence isn't reliable enough to land anyone in jail. But for investors seeking an edge, it may pay to listen closely.

Enron, WorldCom and other accounting disasters show how important -- and hard -- it can be to catch fudged numbers early. But the growing complexity of financial fraud can make standard methods of detection look as obsolete as sharp pencils and a green eyeshade.

The latest approaches are focusing on what comes out of an executive's mouth. Investment research firms like Boston-based Business Intelligence Advisors use former Central Intelligence Agency types to listen for deception on company conference calls. And several studies have found that the absence of personal pronouns and other word patterns can reveal when an executive may be reporting dodgy numbers.

But even nonverbal signals like varying pitch can be a dead giveaway, according to a study by accounting professors at Duke University and the University of Illinois. The authors fed tapes from thousands of quarterly earnings calls through software that searches voices for cues linked with lying. It turns out the calls containing the most cues involved companies with financial statements that later had to be restated.

Like other methods of detecting lies, this one isn't foolproof. It catches fibs about 60 percent of the time, somewhat better than chance. But that's at least on a par with trusted financial-fraud traps like F-score, a system for testing sales, receivables and other publicly reported numbers for red flags. And voice analysis catches lies that the other methods don't.

Of course, determined CEOs might adapt. The study identified some as highly confident in their companies' performance because they held in-the-money options for long periods but didn't cash them in. Even when their numbers turned out to be misleading they didn't display the usual tells, having seemingly rationalized their deceit. Merely mediocre miscreants, on the other hand, would do well to remember that it's not just what you say that counts, but how you say it.

CONTEXT NEWS

-- New research has found that chief executives who lie on earnings calls often give themselves away, for instance in the tone and pitch of their voices. The study, by Jessen Hobson of the University of Illinois and William Mayew and Mohan Venkatachalam of Duke University, used voice analysis to link the way CEOs convey results with subsequent restatements of their companies' financial reports. Their method can identify lying about 61 percent of the time, or 11 percent better than chance, roughly the same as analyses of financial accounting information.

-- Study: link.reuters.com/nyt36s

(Editing by Richard Beales and Martin Langfield)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.