Norway's mass killer complains he is being ridiculed

OSLO Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:35pm IST

Defendant Anders Behring Breivik arrives to the start of the third day of proceedings in the courthouse in Oslo April 18, 2012. REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch

Defendant Anders Behring Breivik arrives to the start of the third day of proceedings in the courthouse in Oslo April 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Fabrizio Bensch

Related Topics

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, daughter of Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi, adjusts her flower garlands as she campaigns for her mother during an election meeting at Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh April 22, 2014. REUTERS/Pawan Kumar

Election 2014

More than 814 million people — a number larger than the population of Europe — are eligible to vote in the world’s biggest democratic exercise.  Full Coverage 

OSLO (Reuters) - Norwegian anti-Islamic fanatic Anders Behring Breivik complained on Wednesday he was being subjected to personal ridicule in court and demanded his killing of 77 people last summer be judged as a battle against immigration.

"I hope you will focus on the issue, not the person," the 33-year-old Breivik told the court, visibly irritated and swivelling a pen in his hand.

Breivik, who killed eight people with a car bomb in Oslo on July 22 and then shot 69 at a Labour Party summer camp, went on trial on Monday.

Asked how he had changed from a teenage vandal on Oslo's prosperous west side to a methodical killer, he said he helped found a militant group called the "Knights Templar" in 2001 and chafed at prosecution suggestions that it was largely imaginary.

"Your intention is to sow doubt whether this network existed," he said at one point, after repeatedly objecting to the way prosecutors phrased their queries.

The original Knights Templar were a medieval brotherhood of knights that prosecuted and financed anti-Islamic crusades.

Breivik has pleaded not guilty to terrorism and murder charges on grounds of "necessity". He called his victims "traitors" with immigrant-friendly ideas.

After the attacks the police tried to confirm Breivik's claim that he had allies plotting new actions. Security agencies across the West turned attention to right-wing extremists, but Norway's police said they concluded Breivik was a lone wolf.

Breivik said he met his first "militant nationalist" in London in 1999, when he was about 20, and several more in 2001, after an adolescence marked by confrontations with Muslim youths from the other side of Oslo.

"I searched toward European militant nationalists," he said. "The militant nationalist community in Norway has a lot of surveillance."

On Tuesday, his first day of direct testimony, he said the September 11, 2001, attacks by Al Qaeda on the United States were key to his radicalisation and that his main source of information was Wikipedia, the open-source online encyclopedia.

When he went to Liberia in 2001 to meet a Serbian nationalist he had two covers, he said on Wednesday, one as a worker for UNICEF, the U.N. children's organisation, and the other as a blood-diamond smuggler carrying a magnifying glass.

From Liberia he travelled to London to meet three other nationalists, people whose names he refused to provide.

"I don't want to give any information that would make other people apprehended," he said.

He admitted on Tuesday that his previous descriptions of the Knights Templar" were a "pompous" exaggeration with a kernel of truth.

"Instead of telling about four sweaty guys in a cellar, or some other locale, you use other ways of description," he said, referring to a 1,500-page written screed and early conversations with psychiatrists in which he implied the secret group was large and powerful.

He said that since 2002 he has had little contact with the people he met in London, and that the "cell" he commands consists of himself alone.

Since Breivik admits the July 22 attacks, his trial will turn on the question of his sanity and thus whether he can be sentenced to prison or to a psychiatric institution.

An initial court-appointed team of psychiatrists concluded he was psychotic, while a second team found him to be of sound mind.

(Writing by Walter Gibbs; Editing by Myra MacDonald)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Shyamaa wrote:
There is always an “other” side to an issue. If we are going to act the moral police on matters, without going through them in all their perspectives then it would be a case of giving the dog a name and hanging it. History is replete with people who have acted keeping in mind the best interests of their community, religion, belief, region, nation at that particular point in time. Even the founder of the “fastest growing religion in the world” has committed many a massacres/slaughters/rapes and we are all scared of even taking his name in public for fear of “repercussions”. Without any fear of consequences we can take the name of Changiz Khan, isn’t he a much respected character in world history? And who can match him in acts of savagery? When we do not apportion any blame to Chengiz Khan, why should we call names Mr. Breivik in the instance?

As the headline to this news item screams, “fanatic Anders Behring Breivik” may be one such Chengiz Khan in the making. You never know, unless we can read world history pertaining to the present times, a thousand years from now. Breivik is scared that his country’s welfare measures are being enjoyed by people belonging to different races, religion, countries. He feels his country and his countrymen may be outnumbered in the future keeping in mind the speed with which outsiders are breeding in his country. If the Norwegian government thinks it is their act of charity to one and all, then the recipient should at least come out of his ghetto mindset. Breivik, I am sure would not have any issue with someone who mingles with his country body and soul and leads a normal life without the psychology of ganging up.

When Theodore Van Gogh was murdered by Mohammed Bouyeri on November 2, 2004 as he was cycling to work in Amsterdam, how many of us had the courage to call Mr. Bouyeri names as we are doing in the present instance? So please let us not be one-sided, parochial in arguing our respective views.

Apr 18, 2012 9:46am IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Ukraine

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Ferry Tragedy

Ferry Tragedy

Boy and girl on Korean ferry tied life jackets together before they drowned.  Full Article 

Lost Plane Mystery

Lost Plane Mystery

Australia rules out link between debris and Malaysian plane.  Full Article 

Obama's Japan Visit

Obama's Japan Visit

Obama reaffirms commitment to Japan on tour of Asia allies.  Full Article 

Solar Dispute

Solar Dispute

Green groups urge U.S. to drop solar trade case against India.  Full Article 

Reconciliation Deal

Reconciliation Deal

Hamas, Abbas's PLO announce reconciliation agreement.  Full Article 

Fighting Pollution

Fighting Pollution

China to impose tougher penalties on polluters in new environmental law.  Full Article 

Death From Fall

Death From Fall

Brother-in-law of Britain's Prince Charles dies in New York.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage