BREAKINGVIEWS-India's market regulator needs to get tougher

Fri May 25, 2012 3:24pm IST

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own)

By Jeff Glekin

MUMBAI, May 25 (Reuters Breakingviews) - India's market regulator may remove the option to settle serious cases like insider trading without admitting guilt. That could lead to even less enforcement from the Securities and Exchange Board of India than at present. But if it hardens SEBI's resolve to land a high-profile conviction, such self-denying ordnance may be worth it.

The Indian consent order process is modelled on the U.S. system although in SEBI's case settlements have become the norm. SEBI has only been around since 1992. Yet the lack of any major conviction in two decades weakens its credibility. Perhaps that's why it wants to close off the settlement route for more severe transgressions. The regulator is to announce the changes within weeks, according to the Financial Express.

Settlements are generally a good thing. They allow quick and pragmatic decisions to be taken without the expense and risk of a legal process. The fines involved can be pretty big - take the record $10 million settlement secured in January 2011 with the tycoon Anil Ambani's Reliance Group. But the ability to settle leaves the regulator vulnerable to political pressure to do so. The financial element also potentially distorts decision making.

Problems with the consent process have to be weighed against the alternatives. The legal system in India is notoriously snail paced and open to corruption. On the other side of the ledger, it has the advantage of transparency. The evidence presented, the reasoning and the decision are all open to scrutiny. Consent orders are dealt with behind closed doors.

Cutting off the settlement avenue for big offences could in the short term see even less punishment meted out given the hurdles to securing a successful prosecution. SEBI risks getting mired in a string of litigation which ultimately proves unsuccessful.

But as things stand, settlements risk being seen as a no more than cost of doing business. Just one landmark conviction for SEBI would resonate and have a lasting deterrent effect. Reform is worth a try.

Context news

- The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is reviewing its guidelines for consent orders and may announce that insider trading cases will be outside the scope of the revised process, the Financial Express reported on May 25, citing a highly placed SEBI official.

- SEBI declined to comment on the report.

- For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can click on

(Editing by Chris Hughes and David Evans)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

School Shooting

School Shooting

Two killed, four wounded in Washington state school shooting.  Full Article 

Sundar Pichai Elevated

Sundar Pichai Elevated

Google's Pichai to oversee major products and services.  Full Article 

Need For Reforms

Need For Reforms

Euro zone risks "relapse into recession" without structural reforms - Draghi.  Full Article 

Diwali Sales

Diwali Sales

Gold sales jump about 20 pct for Diwali - trade body  Full Article 

World Bank Rival

World Bank Rival

Three major nations absent as China launches W.Bank rival in Asia  Full Article 

Wal-Mart India

Wal-Mart India

Murali Lanka appointed as Wal-Mart India operations chief  Full Article 

Health Of Lenders

Health Of Lenders

25 European banks set to fail health checks - sources.  Full Article 

Special Report

Special Report

Why Madrid's poor fear Goldman Sachs and Blackstone  Full Article 

India Insight

India Insight

Kalki Koechlin on her role as a disabled girl in “Margarita, With a Straw”  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage