U.S. appeals court upholds EPA air quality rule

Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:44pm IST

Related Topics

Stocks

   

* US appeals court says EPA not arbitrary or capricious

* 2010 rule limited emissions of nitrogen dioxide

* Oil and gas industry group opposed rule, reviews decision

By Jonathan Stempel

July 17 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court upheld a new Environmental Protection Agency rule to limit nitrogen dioxide emissions near major roadways, in a defeat for the oil industry, which said the rule went beyond what was necessary to protect public health.

Tuesday's decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., is a victory for the Obama administration and environmental groups that supported the 2010 rule, which limits exhaust that could remain in the air for a one-hour period.

The 100 parts-per-billion limit was intended to reduce smog from such sources as car exhaust pipes and factories; it was more stringent than a standard dating from 1971.

Nitrogen oxides have been linked to respiratory problems, especially in children and people with asthma, according to the EPA.

"We cannot conclude the agency was arbitrary and capricious," Judge Douglas Ginsburg wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel. "The record adequately supports the EPA's conclusion that material negative health effects result from ambient air concentrations as low as the 100 parts-per-billion level."

The American Petroleum Institute, which represents more than 500 oil and gas companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp, led opposition to the rule and had sued to overturn it.

"By cherry-picking data and relying on questionable science, EPA set the new regulations at a level more stringent than necessary to protect public health and is putting our economy and jobs unnecessarily at risk," Howard Feldman, API's director of regulatory and scientific policy, said in a statement. "We are reviewing the ruling and will determine possible further action."

The EPA had contended that a significant body of scientific studies has established that the old standard did not sufficiently protect the public health from the harmful effects of nitrogen dioxide exposure, with an adequate margin of safety.

The case is American Petroleum Institute et al v. EPA, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-1079.

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Economic Pulse

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Deregulation Impact

Deregulation Impact

Private fuel retailers to dip toe, not dive back, into India  Full Article 

Gold Import

Gold Import

RBI will not change gold import rules - sources  Full Article 

Idea Results

Idea Results

Idea Cellular Q2 profit up 69 percent  Full Article 

An RBI First

An RBI First

RBI releases minutes of financial stability council's Aug meet  Full Article 

Global Shares

Global Shares

Japanese stocks lead shares worldwide, IBM weighs on Dow  Full Article 

IBM Chip Unit

IBM Chip Unit

IBM to pay Globalfoundries to take chip unit  Full Article 

IBM Earnings

IBM Earnings

IBM ditches 2015 operating EPS target, shares slump 7 pct  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage