UPDATE 1-Senators gird for fight over U.S. Navy's 'Green Fleet'

Wed Jul 18, 2012 4:14am IST

* McCain, Inhofe move to restrict spending in bill

* Bipartisan group plans fight when bill hits Senate floor

* Grassley blames 'Big Oil' for biofuels backlash

By Roberta Rampton and Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON, July 17 (Reuters) - U.S. senators who support the Pentagon's push to expand its use of biofuels said they have a plan to answer critics who argue the fuel is far too expensive to help develop at a time when the military faces massive cuts.

The battle on Capitol Hill comes as the U.S. Navy's "Great Green Fleet" prepares to run military exercises in the central Pacific that will, on Thursday, feature its first operational test of biofuels.

The U.S. military is the world's largest single buyer of oil. The Obama administration has argued "Green Fleet" spending on biofuels could help boost production to commercial levels, eventually lowering prices for alternatives to oil, and reducing dependence on supplies from the Middle East.

For Thursday's demonstration project, the Navy paid more than $26 per gallon for the fuel, made from renewable sources like algae and chicken fat, a $12-million outlay that sparked congressional anger.

Republican critics of the biofuel plan, led by senators John McCain and James Inhofe, found enough support within the Senate Armed Services Committee in May for two proposals that could limit additional spending.

The measures would stop spending on fuels that cost more than conventional fuels, and prevent spending on refineries that would help scale up production of still-experimental fuels. They were added to a bill authorizing defense programs in 2013.


But "Green Fleet" supporters are fighting back.

"We have bipartisan support to undo the work of the committee," said Senator Mark Udall, a Democrat from Colorado who is leading the charge.

When the defense authorization bill reaches the Senate floor, Udall said biofuels supporters may try to amend it to expressly authorize the Navy to develop biofuels to power ships and aircraft - or they could hold a vote to remove the McCain and Inhofe provisions.

"It will be a substantive debate," Udall told Reuters. "I think the story, when it's told, will generate wide support" for defense spending on renewable energy, he said.

Senators Susan Collins, a Republican, and Jeanne Shaheen, a Democrat, wrote an opinion piece in Politico earlier this week signaling their support for overturning the Armed Services panel's biofuels changes.

"We hope to correct that short-sighted mistake when the bill reaches the Senate floor," Shaheen and Collins wrote.

Senator Carl Levin, the Democratic chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said he also hopes to see a change.

"They are going to try to put it back, which is great. I'm all for it," Levin told reporters outside the Senate.

A new six-figure television advertising campaign by military veterans is targeting lawmakers in six states - starting with Senator Rob Portman in Ohio - who voted to restrict military spending on biofuels.

The campaign is organized by the Truman National Security Project, a left-leaning advocacy group on military, energy and foreign policy issues.


McCain told Reuters he knows colleagues who support biofuels will try to overturn his spending curbs.

"But we will continue to fight," McCain said. "I was just reading, it's the cost of one destroyer - $1.8 billion extra - they want to spend on this green technology.

"The fact is, I just do not believe that we need to spend that kind of money on it," McCain said.

Inhofe wrote to President Barack Obama on Wednesday urging him to push Congress to repeal restrictions on military spending on fuels made with coal or natural gas, a measure that was part of a 2007 energy law.

That would "introduce more competition" into the military fuels market and bring down costs, Inhofe said in his letter.

Republican Senator Charles Grassley said the military should be allowed to continue its "investment" so the United States can develop more alternative fuels.

"Nobody would doubt that there's a lot of money maybe wasted in the process of research, but there's more good comes out of it than bad," Grassley told Reuters.

Grassley, known for his backing of ethanol made from corn grown in his home state of Iowa, said he believes the powerful U.S. oil industry is behind a series of efforts to pare back government support for biofuels.

House Republicans have proposed cutting Agriculture Department programs aimed at developing new types of biofuels, and are also questioning a federal mandate that ensures refiners blend gasoline with ethanol and other biofuels.

"It's Big Oil. They don't want any competition. They want to control everything," Grassley said.

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Public Health


Cost Cutting

Cost Cutting

PM Narendra Modi boots officials out of the first class cabin  Full Article 

Airtel Profit Jumps

Airtel Profit Jumps

Bharti Q2 net profit more than doubles   Full Article 

Leisure Riding

Leisure Riding

Harley-Davidson woos affluent young Indians with bike culture  Full Article 

Maruti Earnings

Maruti Earnings

Maruti Suzuki net profit up 29 percent, beats estimates.  Full Article 

ICICI Results

ICICI Results

ICICI Bank Q2 profit up 15 percent, beats estimates.  Full Article 

Moody's on India

Moody's on India

Moody's welcomes India's policy steps, but wants to see more.  Full Article 

End Of QE

End Of QE

U.S. Fed ends bond buying, exhibits confidence in U.S. recovery.  Full Article 

Cook Comes Out

Cook Comes Out

Apple's Cook: "I'm proud to be gay"  Full Article 

Refining Margins

Refining Margins

BPCL aims to double refining margins with refinery expansion.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device  Full Coverage