Drug Safety Settlement

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Bernanke Speaks

Bernanke Speaks

Bernanke touts benefits of easing, no hint of pullback.  Full Article 

Sensex Falls

Sensex Falls

Sensex falls for third day; L&T results spark worries.  Full Article 

Copper Shortage

Copper Shortage

Copper smelter closures put cable makers in tight spot.  Full Article 

Tax Avoidance

Tax Avoidance

Factbox: Apple, Amazon, Google and tax avoidance schemes.  Full Article 

Tracking India Gold

Tracking India Gold

Physical gold market awaits fresh import guidelines.  Full Article 

Earnings Season

Earnings Season

L&T looks overseas to offset weak home market  Full Article | Full Coverage 

Bank Acquisition

Bank Acquisition

Srei Infrastructure to buy Austrian bank unit - paper  Full Article 

Just Dial IPO

Just Dial IPO

Just Dial's 9.4 billion rupee IPO covered 11.6 times  Full Article 

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Confused while buying stocks? Get buy, sell or hold recommendations from VantageTrade.  Full Coverage 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

Mukesh Ambani tops Forbes list, Sunil Mittal not in top 10

Related Topics

Stocks

   
Track BSE Sectoral Indices

Track Markets: BSE Sectoral Indices

Track and analyse performance of all BSE sectoral indices and other global indices on a single page.   Full Coverage 

1 of 2. Reliance Industries Ltd. Chairman Mukesh Ambani addresses shareholders during an annual general meeting in Bombay August 3, 2005.

Credit: Reuters/Punit Paranjpe/Files

MUMBAI | Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:00pm IST

MUMBAI (Reuters) - The corruption scandals and red tape that have hampered India's recent growth took their toll on some of the country's richest in 2012, Forbes magazine's latest rankings showed, though the total worth of the wealthiest 100 inched up in a turbulent year.

Sunil Bharti Mittal, chairman of telecoms giant Bharti Airtel Ltd (BRTI.NS) and Gautam Adani, chairman of the power-focused Adani Group, dropped out of Forbes' annual list of the 10 richest Indians, as uncertainty and controversy gripped their industries.

The fallout from a telecoms scandal that saw 2G licences sold illegally in 2008 has rumbled on through this year as the government has grappled with how to re-auction the airwaves.

India's power and coal industries have been plagued by shortages and delays in mining approvals, due in part to greater scrutiny in the aftermath of accusations the government allocated coal blocks to private companies at below-market prices.

Savitri Jindal, chairwoman of power and steel conglomerate Jindal Group, saw her wealth fall $1.3 billion in the year as Jindal Steel and Power (JNSP.NS) subsidiary is alleged to have benefited from those allocations.

The company has denied allegations that it was unduly favoured in the allocation process.

In the 12 months since Forbes released its 2011 list, India's GDP growth rate has slumped to 5.5 percent from 8 percent.

Mukesh Ambani was India's richest man for the fifth straight year, with wealth of $21 billion, Forbes said, even as his Reliance Industries Ltd(RELI.NS) lost about 7 percent of its market value. ArcelorMittal chairman Lakshmi Mittal was ranked second despite losing $3 billion in net worth since last October.

The biggest climber in the Forbes list was Dilip Shanghvi, chairman of Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (SUN.NS), India's biggest drugmaker by market capitalisation, who entered the top five for the first time as his company's share price soared.

The collective wealth of India's 100 richest rose 3.7 percent to $250 billion, Forbes said, with seven people losing more than $1 billion each over the past 12 months but six gaining at least that.

The list includes 61 billionaires, four more than in 2011, Forbes said, as the minimum wealth necessary to enter the list rose 25 percent to $460 million, still below the threshold of $500 million in 2010.

(Reporting by Henry Foy; Editing by Daniel Magnowski)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.