BREAKINGVIEWS - Pandit putsch is setback for U.S. board governance

Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:36am IST

Citigroup's CEO Vikram Pandit gives an interview on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange June 18, 2012. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/Files

Citigroup's CEO Vikram Pandit gives an interview on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange June 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid/Files

Related Topics

Stocks

   
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, daughter of Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi, adjusts her flower garlands as she campaigns for her mother during an election meeting at Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh April 22, 2014. REUTERS/Pawan Kumar

Election 2014

More than 814 million people — a number larger than the population of Europe — are eligible to vote in the world’s biggest democratic exercise.  Full Coverage 

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

By Rob Cox

NEW YORK (Reuters Breakingviews) - Separating the roles of chairmen and chief executives is good governance, as a rule. That's why the practice is standard in the UK and has been gaining ground in the United States. But the logic is undermined by recent events at Citigroup. Chairman Mike O'Neill's ouster of Vikram Pandit as chief executive last week is looking increasingly like a power-grab rather than a service to shareholders.

An independent chairman serves useful purposes. He, or occasionally she, can provide air cover for management with regulators, politicians and other external constituents, something O'Neill's predecessor Richard Parsons did with relative aplomb. The role comes with internal responsibilities, too, such as running board meetings and, when necessary, holding a CEO's feet to the fire. In extremis, a chairman must show an underperforming boss the door.

Pandit's record of late was mixed. Citi had suffered a few setbacks this year, notably a rebuke from the Federal Reserve over plans to release capital. But the company's stock had rallied by more than a third, a performance that bested rivals JPMorgan (JPM.N) and Wells Fargo (WFC.N). And in the end the ex-CEO's departure came abruptly, just a day after Citi reported better-than-expected third-quarter earnings.

Details reported by the New York Times now suggest that a putsch took place. It seems O'Neill picked off Citi's directors in Machiavellian fashion, persuading each to support stripping Pandit of his job. The chairman then presented the CEO with a fait accompli, according to the Times: quit now, retire at year's end, or be fired. O'Neill gave John Havens, a Pandit confidant who ran Citi's investment bank, a similar message.

Now other senior executives at Citi are considering leaving, including some who would be missed by new CEO Michael Corbat and the board. Some people inside the bank think O'Neill acted partly out of frustration that his own hopes of running a major financial institution never came to fruition. If widely held, that belief could damage Corbat's credibility.

There may have been good reasons for regime change at Citi, such as the desire to turn over a new leaf with regulators. But part of a chairman's job is to manage any succession to ensure the maximum stability and continuity. By that test O'Neill failed. In the process, he has added unfortunate stigma to the useful separation of roles at the top.

CONTEXT NEWS

- Michael O'Neill, Citigroup's chairman, steadily built a case with the U.S. bank's directors since becoming chairman earlier this year to remove Vikram Pandit as chief executive, according to a New York Times report.

- O'Neill effectively forced Pandit's ouster last week when he presented him with three options: to quit immediately, resign effective at year-end, or be fired, the Times reported, citing three people familiar with the deliberations. O'Neill told Pandit: "The board has lost confidence in you."

- New York Times story: link.reuters.com/nuh63t

(Editing by Richard Beales and Martin Langfield)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Telecom Sector

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Election 2014

Election 2014

Breakingviews: Singh wasn’t king, Modi could be  Full Article 

Quarterly Results

Quarterly Results

Ambuja net profit up 6.6 percent, expects recovery after elections  Full Article 

Conspiracy Lawsuit

Conspiracy Lawsuit

Apple, Google agree to pay over $300 million   Full Article 

Stock Split Trend

Stock Split Trend

Trend-setter Apple's stock split could bring out the copycats  Full Article 

Winning Start

Winning Start

Microsoft beats Wall Street on new CEO debut   Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage