Tech Buzz

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

Women's Rights

Women's Rights

Afghan parliament fails to pass divisive women's law.  Full Article 

Lunar Event

Lunar Event

Huge meteoroid strike dazzles scientists.  Video 

Gay Marriage Law

Gay Marriage Law

France the 14th country to legalise gay weddings.  Full Article 

Peer Support

Peer Support

Ferguson criticises City for Mancini sacking.  Full Article 

Flu Toll

Flu Toll

Death toll from new bird flu in China rises to 36: WHO.  Full Article 

Syria Crisis

Syria Crisis

Insight: Syria's Nusra Front eclipsed by Iraq-based al Qaeda.  Full Article | Related Story 

At Cannes

At Cannes

Shots fired at Cannes film festival, actors flee for cover.  Article | Jewellery stolen 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

Pakistan's army chief warns judges not to undermine military

Pakistan's Army Chief General Ashfaq Kayani speaks to the media in Skardu, northen Pakistan after visiting the site of an avalanche in Gayari camp near the Siachen glacier April 18, 2012. REUTERS/Faisal Mahmood/Files

Pakistan's Army Chief General Ashfaq Kayani speaks to the media in Skardu, northen Pakistan after visiting the site of an avalanche in Gayari camp near the Siachen glacier April 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Faisal Mahmood/Files

ISLAMABAD | Mon Nov 5, 2012 9:10pm IST

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Pakistan's army chief warned on Monday, in a veiled challenge to the Supreme Court, that any efforts to undermine the military and "draw a wedge" between it and its citizens would not be tolerated.

Chief Supreme Court Judge Iftikhar Chaudhry ruled last month that the military must stop interfering in politics, a rare challenge to Pakistan's powerful generals.

The ruling has stoked tensions between the court and the military, which has ruled Pakistan for more than half of its 65-year history through coups or from behind the scenes.

"Any effort which wittingly or unwittingly draws a wedge between the people and Armed Forces of Pakistan undermines the larger national interest," said General Ashfaq Kayani, in a rare public statement that did not specifically mention the court or its judges.

An army official, who wished not to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter, confirmed that Kayani was responding in part to the Supreme Court judgment.

The October court ruling came in connection with a case dating back to 1996 in which a retired air marshal filed a petition against the army for sponsoring a political alliance.

The Supreme Court has asked the federal government to take necessary steps under the constitution against retired generals named in the case. However, Pakistan's government has little sway over generals in the military, which is one of the biggest in the world.

"While individual mistakes might have been made by all of us in the country, these should be left to the due process of law," Kayani said.

"Let us not pre-judge anyone, be it civilian or a military person, and extend it, unnecessarily, to undermine respective institutions."

The long-running standoff between the judiciary and the U.S.-backed government has fuelled instability in Pakistan, a nuclear-armed country with a fragile economy that has been battered by a Taliban insurgency.

In the late 1980s, Pakistan's military Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) was accused of establishing a political cell that worked with the presidency to distribute money to selected politicians in a bid to get them elected.

(Additional reporting by Mehreen Zahra-Malik; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
kamran17 wrote:
“An army official, who wished not to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter, confirmed that Kayani was responding in part to the Supreme Court judgment.”

^which was actually written by the writer himself/herself to make the whole point of the story. Because what Army chief said was not directed at judiciary but rather towards politicians and media.

Nov 05, 2012 11:18pm IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.