Pakistani scientist Aafia Siddiqui loses appeal on shooting conviction

NEW YORK Tue Nov 6, 2012 4:54am IST

An Islamist demonstrator holds pictures of Pakistani scientist Aafia Siddiqui outside the U.S. embassy in Tunis, during a protest calling for her release February 9, 2012. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi /Files

An Islamist demonstrator holds pictures of Pakistani scientist Aafia Siddiqui outside the U.S. embassy in Tunis, during a protest calling for her release February 9, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Zoubeir Souissi /Files

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Monday upheld the conviction and 86-year prison sentence of a Pakistani neuroscientist for shooting at FBI agents and soldiers after her arrest in Afghanistan.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said a lower court judge had not erred in allowing Aafia Siddiqui, 40, to testify in her own defense at trial and in allowing certain evidence against her.

Siddiqui, whose conviction was widely criticized in Pakistan, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Richard Berman in September 2010. She was convicted by a New York federal jury of attempted murder, armed assault and other charges.

She was arrested in July 2008 by Afghan police, who said she was carrying two pounds (900 grams) of sodium cyanide and crumpled notes referring to mass casualty attacks and New York landmarks.

The day after her arrest, she grabbed an M-4 rifle in her interrogation room and started shooting while yelling "death to America," the trial jury heard.

No U.S. agents or soldiers were hit, but Siddiqui was shot and wounded in response, according to U.S. prosecutors.

Siddiqui's defense lawyers, three of whom were paid by the Pakistani government, argued that their client had shot at the U.S. officials in a panic and said the crime lacked any connection to terrorism.

On appeal, her attorneys challenged her conviction and sentence on many grounds. They said the judge improperly allowed jurors to consider the crumpled notes, and that the judge should never have allowed Siddiqui to decide whether to take the stand.

"The district court went to extraordinary lengths to ensure that Siddiqui understood the implications of testifying and had the capacity to testify," the opinion said.

Dawn Cardi, an attorney for Siddiqui, was not immediately available to comment.

The appeals court also sided with Berman in finding that Siddiqui had likely premeditated the attack, and that terrorism sentencing requirements were applicable because of her willingness to harm Americans. (Reporting by Basil Katz; Editing by Todd Eastham)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

India-Nepal Ties

TOP SHOWCASE

Mideast Conflict

Mideast Conflict

Gaza bloodshed deepens, death toll tops 700.  Full Article 

Subsidy Concerns

Subsidy Concerns

India will not back WTO protocol unless concerns addressed - sources  Full Article 

Food Scandal

Food Scandal

China probes 581 firms, restaurants as food safety scare spreads.  Full Article 

Virtual Risks

Virtual Risks

Flaws could expose users of privacy-protecting software, researchers say.  Full Article 

Facebook Results

Facebook Results

Q2 beats Wall Street targets, stock hits record high  Full Article 

Opening Ceremony

Opening Ceremony

Song and dance at the 2014 Commonwealth Games.  Slideshow 

Photographers' Blog

Photographers' Blog

Waiting to die in Varanasi.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage