Indian board rejects AstraZeneca's patent plea on cancer drug

Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:48am IST

BELVIQ (lorcaserin hydrochloride) tablets are shown in this Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc handout image released to Reuters on June 27, 2012. REUTERS/Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc/Handout/Files

BELVIQ (lorcaserin hydrochloride) tablets are shown in this Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc handout image released to Reuters on June 27, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc/Handout/Files

Related Topics


Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, daughter of Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi, adjusts her flower garlands as she campaigns for her mother during an election meeting at Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh April 22, 2014. REUTERS/Pawan Kumar

Election 2014

More than 814 million people — a number larger than the population of Europe — are eligible to vote in the world’s biggest democratic exercise.  Full Coverage 

REUTERS - India's patents appeal board has dismissed British drugmaker AstraZeneca's (AZN.L) petition challenging an earlier ruling that refused patent protection for a cancer-fighting drug, in the latest blow for Big Pharma in the country.

The Indian patents office in 2007 refused patent protection to AstraZeneca's quinazoline molecule, citing lack of invention. The Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) on Monday upheld the refusal.

The decision is also a setback for struggling AstraZeneca, which is battling to turn itself around as key drugs lose patent protection.

Global drug companies suffered a high-profile reversal in March when India granted the first ever compulsory licence to domestic drugmaker Natco Pharma (NATP.NS) to sell cheap copies of Bayer's (BAYGn.DE) cancer drug Nexavar. Bayer has appealed the order.

And early this month IPAB revoked a six-year-old Indian patent granted to Roche's (ROG.VX) hepatitis C drug Pegasys, citing lack of evidence that the drug was any better than existing treatments.

Multinational drug manufacturers regard India's $13 billion drug market as a huge opportunity, but are wary of what they see as lax protection for intellectual property in a country where generic medicines account for more than 90 percent of sales.

Indian generic companies, which do not need to plough money into future research, can produce drugs at a fraction of the cost of originator firms like Roche or Bayer.

Natco and another domestic drugmaker, G. M. Pharma, had opposed the initial patent application for AstraZeneca quinazoline derivative. The London-listed company filed a review petition, which India's patent office dismissed in 2011.

A challenge to a review petition does not come under the purview of the IPAB, and even on merit the petition has failed, S. Majumdar & Co, the counsel for Natco Pharma, said in a statement.

AstraZeneca could not immediately be reached for a comment by Reuters. The company has the option to take its case to India's Supreme Court. (Reporting by Kaustubh Kulkarni in MUMBAI; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Market Eye


Asian Markets

Asian Markets

Asian stocks flat after China PMI meets expectations  Full Article 

Chinese Economy

Chinese Economy

Factory activity shrinks for 4th month; pace of decline slows   Full Article 

International Gold

International Gold

Gold hovers near 2-1/2 month lows on firm equities, fund outflows  Full Article 

GM Lawsuit

GM Lawsuit

GM seeks U.S. court protection against ignition lawsuits  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage