U.S. war on al Qaeda will not be indefinite - Pentagon lawyer

WASHINGTON Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:43pm IST

A commercial plane flies past the Pentagon as security watch from the roof September 11, 2008. REUTERS/Jason Reed/Files

A commercial plane flies past the Pentagon as security watch from the roof September 11, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed/Files

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. military campaign against al Qaeda should not be seen as a conflict without end, the Pentagon's chief lawyer said on Friday in a speech that broached a rarely discussed subject among U.S. officials.

The Defense Department's highest-ranking lawyer, Jeh Johnson, predicted al Qaeda would some day be so "effectively destroyed" that the United States would no longer say it is in an armed conflict. A text of his remarks to be given at Oxford University in England was made available to Reuters in advance in Washington.

The U.S. government points to the existence of an armed conflict as the legal underpinning of practices such as indefinite detention of the global militant group's members and allies.

Johnson's remarks could ignite a global political debate with arguments from both the left and the right.

The speech to the Oxford Union did not forecast when such a moment would arrive because, it said, al Qaeda and its affiliates in Yemen and elsewhere remain a danger.

But Johnson tried to frame the discussion with what he called conventional legal principles rather than a new legal structure emerging from the September 11 attacks.

"Now that efforts by the U.S. military against al Qaeda are in their 12th year, we must also ask ourselves: how will this conflict end?" said Johnson, an appointee of U.S. President Barack Obama.

Johnson has been mentioned as a possible U.S. attorney general to succeed Eric Holder in Obama's second term. A former New York corporate lawyer and federal prosecutor, he has been at the center of internal administration debates on national security since he arrived at the Pentagon as general counsel in 2009.

An "open end" to the conflict has been a defining feature of what then-President George W. Bush called a war on terror beginning with the September 11 attacks that destroyed New York's World Trade Center, damaged the Pentagon and killed 3,000 people.

Three days after the attacks, Congress authorized force against all "nations, organizations or persons" who planned them or who aided the planners.

'TIPPING POINT'

In courtrooms, congressional hearings and executive orders, U.S. officials with rare exceptions speak of a conflict with no obvious end point.

"I think one day they will be defeated, but it's not going to happen any time soon," Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican, told The Huffington Post website this week.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Johnson's boss, said in a November 20 speech that U.S. forces had decimated al Qaeda's core and made progress in Yemen and Somalia but needed to avert militant gains in Mali and Nigeria.

By asking how the conflict would end, Johnson could provoke a public conversation that gets more specific.

"There will come a tipping point," he said in the speech, "a tipping point at which so many of the leaders and operatives of al Qaeda and its affiliates have been killed or captured, and the group is no longer able to attempt or launch a strategic attack against the United States," that al Qaeda will be "effectively destroyed."

"At that point, we must be able to say to ourselves that our efforts should no longer be considered an 'armed conflict' against al Qaeda and its associated forces."

Under that scenario, law enforcement and intelligence agents would go on pursuing individual militants or groups with the military in a reserve role.

"'War' must be regarded as a finite, extraordinary and unnatural state of affairs," Johnson said. "We must not accept the current conflict, and all that it entails, as the 'new normal.' Peace must be regarded as the norm toward which the human race continually strives."

But what to do with detainees not charged with crimes - such as some of those held at the Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Base in Cuba - might still be a slow process, Johnson said.

In one of 25 footnotes to the written remarks, Johnson cited a U.S. Supreme Court ruling from 1948 that allowed the detention of German nationals for six years after fighting with Germany ended.

(Editing by Howard Goller and Bill Trott)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Ebola Outbreak

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Ebola Outbreak

Ebola Outbreak

U.S. to issue new Ebola guidelines, watch lists to shrink.  Full Article 

Setback for Abe

Setback for Abe

Setback for Japan PM as trade minister quits, media say another resign.  Full Article 

New President

New President

Reform-minded outsider Widodo takes over as Indonesia's president.  Full Article 

Call for Leniency

Call for Leniency

South Korea concert victims' families call for leniency.  Full Article 

Hong Kong Crisis

Hong Kong Crisis

Hong Kong crisis deepens after weekend clashes, talks set for Tuesday.  Full Article 

Kidnapped Girls

Kidnapped Girls

Nigerians doubtful of girls' release after Boko Haram "truce" breached.  Full Article 

Brazil Politics

Brazil Politics

Brazil's Rousseff on the offensive a week from runoff vote.  Full Article 

Nepal Disaster

Nepal Disaster

Tragedy shakes Nepal's faith in tourism.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage