Sahara case hearing deferred to Wednesday
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The Supreme Court of India deferred until Wednesday a hearing over the Sahara conglomerate's failure to meet the court's guidelines to repay billions of dollars it had raised from investors through bond sales that were later ruled to be illegal.
On August 31, the court had asked Sahara to repay within 90 days as much as 240 billion rupees to up to nearly 30 million mostly small investors, plus interest of 15 percent a year.
Sahara said in newspaper advertisements on Saturday it had "cleared" about 330 billion rupees to investors in the so-called optionally fully-convertible debentures and had maximum outstanding liability of 51.20 billion rupees, which it was ready to deposit with the authorities.
SEBI said in late October it had received complaints from investors that they were being "forced" by agents and officials of Sahara to switch the money held through the outlawed bonds to other investment products sold by the group.
A member of a two-judge Supreme Court bench on Monday said Sahara had defaulted on paying the money as ordered by November 30, the Economic Times newspaper reported.
The Supreme Court said it would hear the case on Wednesday, after a lawyer for Sahara sought more time to reply to why the group had not complied with the court's order.
The unlisted Sahara, whose interests range from real estate to insurance and sports, is a household name in India, where it is the lead sponsor of the national cricket team. It recently bought New York's Plaza Hotel, and had earlier bought the Grosvenor House hotel in London.
- Tweet this
- Share this
- Digg this
- UPDATE 4-Ted Turner rushed to clinic in Argentina with appendicitis-media
- UPDATE 3-Boeing reports wing cracks on 787 Dreamliners in production
- Exclusive - Pimco's Gross declares El-Erian is 'trying to undermine me'
- UPDATE 2-White House plays down speedy role for U.S. natural gas in Ukraine
- UPDATE 3-MasterCard, Visa form group to push for better card security
Sahara’s investment programmes include schemes that are similar to a typical Indian bank’s fixed or recurring deposits. But the arrest of the company's chief Subrata Roy last week and the court case over an outlawed bond scheme are raising fears among some investors who worry they will not get their money back. Full Article