Champions League

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

Neymar for Barcelona?

Neymar for Barcelona?

Brazil's Santos decide to let Neymar go.  Full Article 

French Open

French Open

Nadal, Djokovic on semi-final collision course in Paris.  Full Article | Related Story 

Olympic Committee

Olympic Committee

IOC sets September 1 deadline for India to hold elections.  Full Article 

Newest Member

Newest Member

UEFA targets game's evils on great day for Gibraltar.  Full Article 

Brand Rivalry

Brand Rivalry

Adidas and Puma take rivalry to European soccer final.  Full Article 

New Inter Coach

New Inter Coach

Mazzarri takes over Inter after Stramaccioni sacked.  Full Article 

Gary's Approach

Gary's Approach

It's all in the mind for South African Kirsten.  Full Article 

IndyCar Racing

IndyCar Racing

Indy 500's elite club may welcome new member  Full Article 

IOC Top Job

IOC Top Job

Rowing body chief Oswald runs for IOC top job.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

Goal-line technology here to stay, says FIFA president

FIFA President Sepp Blatter attends a news conference following their executive committee meeting in Tokyo December 15, 2012. REUTERS/Toru Hanai

FIFA President Sepp Blatter attends a news conference following their executive committee meeting in Tokyo December 15, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Toru Hanai

TOKYO | Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:09pm IST

TOKYO (Reuters) - After unsuccessful tests of goal-line technology in 2005 and 2007, FIFA promised on Saturday that future World Cups would be free of any more shocking Frank Lampard moments.

Soccer's world governing body are using two systems, Hawk-Eye and GoalRef, at the Club World Cup in Japan, with one of them to be used at next year's Confederations Cup.

"One of these two systems - we are not going to take both - but one of the two will be used at Confederations Cup and at the 2014 World Cup," Blatter told reporters in Tokyo.

"There were no critical decisions so far," the Swiss added before Sunday's final between Chelsea and Brazil's Corinthians in Yokohama.

"We will make an assessment after the final matches tomorrow. For the time being, we can only say it works."

The British-designed Hawk-Eye, used successfully for many years in cricket and tennis, relies on seven high-speed cameras set up at different angles covering each goal.

GoalRef, a Danish-German project, uses an electronic coil inside the ball and low magnetic waves around the goal.

"The referees are happy to have this help for them because they know now if there is a conflicting situation they will get the accuracy to say if was a goal or not," said Blatter.

"We were speaking of goal-line technology since the beginning of 2000. We had it in the 2007 Club World Cup with the (Cairos) chip in the ball system.

"We saw it didn't work so well so we put the goal-line technology on ice until we had a system that is accurate - and then look what happened.

"In the 2010 World Cup, you remember Lampard scored a wonderful goal (against Germany) which landed at least 70 centimetres behind the line.

"The officials couldn't see it, wouldn't see it - I don't know. But anyway the game continued.

"At that time as president of FIFA, I said if I was still president of FIFA in 2014 then we cannot afford to have the same situation when an accurate system exists."

Both systems being used at the Club World Cup, which relay information to the referee via a vibrating wristwatch in a split second, have passed all pre-game tests with no problems.

The English FA and Premier League have backed Hawk-Eye, though UEFA president Michel Platini remains stubbornly opposed to the use of technology.

"We have found two accurate systems in the past year and therefore the goal-line technology has been introduced," said Blatter.

"We will use it for the highlight of the World Cup. We are very confident, the referees are confident and the players are confident that they know if a goal is scored or not."

(Editing by John O'Brien)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.