Cyber Security

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

UK Tax Row

UK Tax Row

Google's Schmidt to meet Britain's Cameron as tax row rages.  Full Article | Related Story 

Seeking Advice

Seeking Advice

Bloomberg appoints former IBM chief to advise on data issues.  Full Article 

Samsung vs Apple

Samsung vs Apple

A stretched Samsung chases rival Apple's suppliers.  Full Article 

Google Glass

Google Glass

Facebook, Twitter apps come to Glass, Google's wearable computer.  Full Article 

Labour Issues

Labour Issues

Foxconn says needs more time to further cut workers' overtime.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

Intel wins patent appeal against N-Data

Related Topics

Stocks

   
People walk past the Intel stand at the Gulf Information and Technology Exhibition (GITEX) at the Dubai World Trade Centre in Dubai October 14, 2012. REUTERS/Jumana ElHeloueh/Files

People walk past the Intel stand at the Gulf Information and Technology Exhibition (GITEX) at the Dubai World Trade Centre in Dubai October 14, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jumana ElHeloueh/Files

WASHINGTON | Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:09am IST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Intel Corp. (INTC.O) won an appeal in a patent fight with Negotiated Data Solutions LLC (N-Data) over ethernet patents that make it possible for computers to easily talk to one another.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on Monday that Intel did not infringe the patents because it had licensed them from National Semiconductor Corp in 1976. National had assigned the patents to Vertical Networks Inc in 1998, which assigned them to N-Data.

Based on the licensing agreement, Intel won the case in a Texas court on summary judgment. The appeals court agreed.

N-Data had also sued Dell Inc (DELL.O), which settled in 2009.

The case at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is Intel Corp. v Negotiated Data Solutions, Inc., No. 2011-1448.

(Reporting By Diane Bartz; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.