Judge rejects part of Apple App Store suit vs Amazon

SAN FRANCISCO Wed Jan 2, 2013 11:27pm IST

Customers leave the Apple store after buying iPad minis in London November 2, 2012. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett/Files

Customers leave the Apple store after buying iPad minis in London November 2, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Suzanne Plunkett/Files

Related Topics

Stocks

   

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Wednesday rejected part of Apple Inc's (AAPL.O) lawsuit against Amazon.com Inc's (AMZN.O) use of the term App Store, ruling Apple cannot bring a false advertising claim against the online retailer.

U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton in Oakland, California, granted Amazon's motion for partial summary judgment, which only challenged Apple's false advertising allegations. Apple leveled other claims against Amazon, including trademark infringement.

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment, and an Amazon representative could not be reached immediately.

Amazon has stepped up competition against Apple in recent years, launching its cheaper Kindle tablet computer to go after the dominant iPad and trying to lure mobile application developers to its Kindle platform.

One of the first public clashes in their tussle was Apple's 2011 lawsuit.

Apple accused Amazon of misusing what it calls its APP STORE to solicit developers for a mobile software download service. However, Amazon said its so-called Appstore has become so generic that its use could not constitute false advertising.

In a legal filing last year, Amazon added that even Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook and his predecessor, Steve Jobs, used the term to discuss rivals. Cook commented on "the number of app stores out there" and Jobs referred to the "four app stores on Android."

In her ruling on Wednesday, Hamilton wrote that the mere use of "Appstore" by Amazon cannot be taken as a representation that its service is the same as Apple's.

"Apple has failed to establish that Amazon made any false statement (express or implied) of fact that actually deceived or had the tendency to deceive a substantial segment of its audience," Hamilton wrote.

A trial on Apple's remaining claims is scheduled for August.

The case is Apple Inc v. Amazon.com Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 11-01327. (Additional reporting by Alistair Barr in San Francisco; Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Jeffrey Benkoe)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

APPLE

A shattered large glass panel, part of Apple's cube store on Fifth Avenue, damaged from the results of the snowstorm on Tuesday is seen in New York, January 22, 2014. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/Files

Apple e-book settlement gets court nod

Apple Inc won preliminary court approval for its $450 million settlement of claims it harmed consumers by conspiring with publishers to raise e-book prices. In approving the accord, U.S. District Judge overcame concerns she had expressed over a settlement provision allowing Apple to pay just $70 million if related litigation were to drag out.  Full Article 

Reuters Showcase

LinkdIn Growth

LinkdIn Growth

LinkedIn's hiring business seen key to growth  Full Article 

HP Settlement

HP Settlement

Hewlett-Packard to pay $32.5 million to settle USPS pricing case  Full Article 

Digital Teleporting

Digital Teleporting

Film world's cast of toys teleport into digital playground   Full Article 

China Hacking?

China Hacking?

Hacking attack in Canada bears signs of Chinese army unit - expert  Full Article 

P2i IPO

P2i IPO

Start-up behind 'dunkable' phone technology explores Asian IPO  Full Article 

BBM for Windows

BBM for Windows

BlackBerry opens up BBM to Windows phone users  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage