California court finds for Apple in credit card suit

SAN FRANCISCO Tue Feb 5, 2013 5:13am IST

The Apple logo hangs in a glass enclosure above the 5th Ave Apple Store in New York, September 20, 2012. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/Files

The Apple logo hangs in a glass enclosure above the 5th Ave Apple Store in New York, September 20, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson/Files

Related Topics

Stocks

   

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Apple Inc (AAPL.O) and other online retailers did not break California law by requiring consumers to provide their address and phone numbers as a condition of accepting credit card payments, the state's high court ruled on Monday.

In a split decision, the California Supreme Court said state privacy protections for credit cards do not apply to online purchases that are downloaded electronically.

The ruling comes after the same court in 2011 said that those privacy protections do apply to brick and mortar retailers, finding that they could not request a customer's ZIP code during a credit card transaction.

Apple was the defendant in the latest lawsuit, brought as a proposed class action by a consumer who purchased downloads from iTunes. Online retailers eBay Inc (EBAY.O) and Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT.N) also filed briefs supporting Apple.

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment, and an attorney for the plaintiff could not be reached.

Three dissenting California Supreme Court justices argued that the ruling represents "a major win for these sellers, but a major loss for consumers, who in their online activities already face an ever-increasing encroachment upon their privacy."

But the four justices in the majority disagreed. "These ominous assertions, though eye-catching, do not withstand scrutiny," Justice Goodwin Liu wrote.

Other state and federal privacy laws protect against disclosure of personal identification information, Liu wrote for the majority. Additionally, electronic retailers need more safeguards against fraud than traditional shops.

"Unlike a brick-and-mortar retailer, an online retailer cannot visually inspect the credit card, the signature on the back of the card, or the customer's photo identification," Liu wrote.

The case in the Supreme Court of California is Apple Inc vs. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County and David Krescent, S199384.

(Reporting By Dan Levine; editing by Carol Bishopric and Bob Burgdorfer)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

HEARTBLEED BUG

REUTERS SHOWCASE

No-hire Trial

No-hire Trial

Tech workers seek to use Steve Jobs evidence in upcoming trial on no-hire accords  Full Article 

Apartheid-era Case

Apartheid-era Case

Ford, IBM to face renewed U.S. lawsuit over apartheid-era abuses  Full Article 

Online Banking

Online Banking

China issues banking rules to strengthen online payment security  Full Article 

Web Control

Web Control

China calls on Russia, central Asia allies to tighten Internet controls.  Full Article 

In Demand

In Demand

Microsoft's Xbox One sales cross 5 million.  Full Article 

Digital Currency

Digital Currency

Mt. Gox suitors seek support to save bitcoin exchange.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage