CEO Fired

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

Tornado in U.S.

Tornado in U.S.

Many children among 91 feared dead in tornado-hit Oklahoma.  Full Article 

Gandhi Sample Auction

Gandhi Sample Auction

Gandhi blood sample up for auction in London.  Full Article 

Tech Factbox

Tech Factbox

Yahoo's acquisitions: from Geocities to Tumblr  Full Article 

Mourinho Exit

Mourinho Exit

Mourinho to leave Real Madrid at end of season.  Full Article 

India at Cannes

India at Cannes

Snapshots of Indian presence at the 66th Cannes Film Festival  Slideshow 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

Sri Lanka "poor host" for Commonwealth summit: Human Rights Watch

Related Topics

Visitors look at a display of flowers during media day at the Chelsea Flower Show in London May 20, 2013. REUTERS/Stefan Wermuth

Chelsea Flower Show

The Queen, Prince Harry as well as garden gnomes turn up at the 100th annual Chelsea Flower Show.  Slideshow 

LONDON | Fri Feb 8, 2013 2:45am IST

LONDON (Reuters) - Commonwealth nations should move their 2013 leaders' summit from Sri Lanka unless it makes prompt progress on its "abysmal" human rights record, Human Rights Watch (HRW) said on Thursday.

Holding the bi-annual Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in the capital Colombo in November would undermine the association's commitment to supporting human rights, it said.

The appeal came days after Sri Lanka barred a human rights panel from entering the country.

"The Sri Lankan government's blatant disregard for the Commonwealth's principles of human rights and democratic reform makes it a poor host for this important event," said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch.

"Unless the government urgently addresses abuses and ends impunity, the international recognition it will gain by hosting the Commonwealth summit while repressing its key values will be an embarrassment to the Commonwealth and its member countries," he added.

The Commonwealth is a grouping of 54 countries and evolved from the former British former empire.

Commonwealth Secretary General Kamalesh Sharma is scheduled to visit Sri Lanka later this week to discuss the meeting, HRW said.

Since the end of a three-decade war in May 2009, Sri Lanka has rejected claims of human rights abuses including accusations it killed thousands of ethnic minority Tamil civilians in the rebel-held area.

The Sri Lankan government sacked its chief justice in January, drawing condemnation from the United States and the United Nations.

Britain's Foreign Office said it was looking to Sri Lanka to demonstrate its commitment "to upholding the Commonwealth values of good governance and respect for human rights".

"A key part of this will be to address longstanding issues around accountability and reconciliation after the war."

Reopening a discussion into who should host the 2013 summit would require the consensus of all Commonwealth member states, the Foreign Office added.

(Reporting by Alice Baghdjian; Editing by Tim Castle and Jon Hemming)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
AnandaS wrote:
I am Sri Lankan living in USA for the last 25 years. I am not belonging to any political party in Sri Lanka but I am following every political and human right issue if there are any, in Sri Lanka. My humble opinion on this article and continuous attack on the human rights by HR watch is in Sri Lanka is highly exaggerated. It shows how strong the LTTE and pro-LTTE propaganda and their money talked more than human rights. Every Sri Lankan is protected by law and order and now than any time before LTTE was eliminated, people are living happily and peacefully. It is the truth. Yes, there are isolated incidents here and there like any other country. Further, yes, current government is a bit arrogant than what the West and these HR organizations want but Sri Lanka is a peaceful country and not a killing field or even like Chicago or LA. Sri Lanka is more serine, beautiful and peaceful. Don’t exaggerate things and try to please the Pro-LTTE propagandist that promotes these lies to gain sympathy and justification to achieve their dreamland or their so called Tamil Eelam. This is why Sri Lankans love President and his family because they are the only politicians who can annihilate LTTE and save the country even in the future from these barbaric terrorists. You are just supporting this bloody terrorist group by raising these non-existing human right issues. By the way, most of the Tamils who were dead during the last phase of the war were LTTE Tamil terrorists and not innocent Tamils. That’s violation of human right? NO! it is saving human rights of innocent people by eliminating a bunch of bloody terrorists. Why on earth these pro-LTTE Tamil idiots cannot live with other Sri Lankans in peace side by side? These pro-LTTE Tamils have an inferiority complex and an ego that don’t like to call them minority in Sri Lanka. Go to Tamil Nadu and live there, if they don’t want to accept the reality and live peacefully within a united Sri Lanka.

Feb 08, 2013 9:00am IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.