U.N.'s rights chief says Assad should face war crimes probe

LONDON Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:23am IST

Syria's President Bashar al-Assad (C) waves to his supporters after speaking at the Opera House in Damascus January 6, 2013. REUTERS/Sana/Files

Syria's President Bashar al-Assad (C) waves to his supporters after speaking at the Opera House in Damascus January 6, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Sana/Files

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - The United Nations human rights chief said on Saturday Syrian President Bashar al-Assad should be probed for war crimes and called for immediate action by the international community, including possible military intervention.

Navi Pillay, the U.N. high commissioner for human rights, repeated her call for the Syrian president to be referred to the International Criminal Court for the actions of his forces in the civil war which the U.N. says has left almost 70,000 dead in 22 months of fighting.

Asked if Assad should be investigated for war crimes, she told Britain's Channel 4 News: "He's not but he should be.

"This is my strong call that I made 18 months ago. Based on the evidence, I said crimes against humanity and Syria's war crimes are being committed by President Assad's forces, his security forces, and other groups allied to him," she said.

"There should be a referral by the Security Council to the International Criminal Court. I would describe (Assad's actions) as evidence of crimes against humanity and war crimes, against his own people."

World powers are divided on how to stop the escalating violence in Syria and the Security Council is unlikely to refer the matter to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, which is not an official U.N. body.

Permanent Security Council members Russia and China have acted as Syria's protector on the council by repeatedly blocking Western efforts to take stronger U.N. action - such as sanctions - against the Syrian government.

Pillay said the Security Council had a range of tools to keep warring sides apart to allow negotiations, and said action was needed urgently.

"I'm not arguing for any specific intervention," she said. "It's an intergovernmental decision on what kind of action - intervention, peacekeeping, military intervention or a referral to the International Criminal Court. We urge that action be taken immediately. "

However, she acknowledged that after the U.N. intervention in Libya in 2011 which led to the ousting of former leader Muammar Gaddafi, some members of the Security Council were loathe to use force again, in case it led to regime change and "so acting out the interests of one or other government".

"This is what I'm hearing in the Security Council," she said.

"If there is doubt and hesitation it is because people are assessing the value of military intervention in places like Libya, Syria and Afghanistan. That it could become a long, drawn out war with no guarantees that civilians will not be harmed in that process." (Reporting by Michael Holden; Editing by Jason Webb)

FILED UNDER:
  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Cabinet Changes

Cabinet Changes

Hagel resigns as U.S. defence secretary.  Full Article 

Terrorism Threat

Terrorism Threat

UK faces biggest terrorism threat in its history - minister.  Full Article 

Facing a split

Facing a Split

Sri Lanka's Rajapaksa wins 2015 budget vote despite defection.  Full Article 

Suicide Attack

Suicide Attack

Bomber targeted police commander in Afghan volleyball game attack.  Full Article 

Budget Slash

Budget Slash

Indonesia's cost-cutting, economy-flying leader slashes travel funds.  Full Article 

Presidential Ballot

Presidential Ballot

Tunisia presidential vote heads into close run-off.  Full Article 

Mobile Boost

Mobile Boost

Bank on poor women and phones to drive growth in Africa, experts say.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device  Full Coverage