Upheaval Aboard

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Reuters Showcase

IOC Sets Deadline

IOC Sets Deadline

IOC sets September 1 deadline for India to hold elections.  Full Article 

Attack in Kabul

Attack in Kabul

Taliban attack U.N. compound in Afghan capital: police.  Full Article | Slideshow 

Woolwich Murder

Woolwich Murder

British security services in spotlight after soldier murder.  Full Article 

Ending War Era

Ending War Era

Obama seeks end to perpetual U.S. 'war on terror'.  Full Article 

Bird Flu

Bird Flu Scare

New bird flu may be capable of human to human spread.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

U.S. defense chief says range of options discussed on Afghanistan

Related Topics

U.S.' Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta addresses a news conference during a NATO defence ministers meeting at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels February 22, 2013. REUTERS/Eric Vidal

U.S.' Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta addresses a news conference during a NATO defence ministers meeting at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels February 22, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Eric Vidal

BRUSSELS | Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:29pm IST

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta denied on Friday the United States had told allies it planned to keep 8,000 to 12,000 troops in Afghanistan after 2014, saying a range of troop options for an overall NATO presence in Afghanistan had been discussed.

"That report is not correct," Panetta said, referring to an account of a NATO defence ministers' meeting in Brussels given by German Defence Minister Thomas de Maiziere.

"We did discuss a range of options and what we discussed was a range of options that would be directed to the NATO force overall, which includes both the U.S. force contribution that we would make, plus what other NATO countries would contribute as well," he told a news conference.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart, Adrian Croft; editing by Rex Merrifield)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.