Railway Budget 2013: Reactions from the common man

Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:48pm IST

Passengers check their names on a boarding chart at New Delhi's railway station, Feb 26, 2013. REUTERS/Arnika Thakur

Passengers check their names on a boarding chart at New Delhi's railway station, Feb 26, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Arnika Thakur

Related Topics

Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, daughter of Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi, adjusts her flower garlands as she campaigns for her mother during an election meeting at Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh April 22, 2014. REUTERS/Pawan Kumar

Election 2014

More than 814 million people — a number larger than the population of Europe — are eligible to vote in the world’s biggest democratic exercise.  Full Coverage 

REUTERS - The government announced a fuel surcharge of just under 5 percent on freight traffic in the railway budget on Tuesday, but ducked the opportunity of a further round of passenger fare hikes as it gears up for a national election due next year.

Here are some reactions from people on the street:

Shanta Dutta, 56, teacher - "Tatkal prices are expensive anyway and increasing them is unfair."

Shivaji Dutta, 62, passenger from Assam - "Passenger fares should have been increased a little because it is important that the railways do not run at a loss."

Janardan Pandey, 42, army soldier - "With cost of living going up at this rate, rail fares should also have been increased. The government is giving you more facilities -- how will it pay for them?"

Ramji Lal, 52, railway employee - "Rail fares should be increased since they haven't really been raised in 10 years. The current fares are too low."

Shivnath Agarwal, 71, lawyer - "The Congress government is a bogus government. They don't reduce their expenditure but make the common man suffer."

Murari Lal Sharma, 68, real estate promoter from Kolkata - "The country's population is increasing and rail fares should be raised in order to cater to the people. So many people have to come and go, how will the government get money for all this?"

Shyam Sunder Gupta, 73, businessman from Kolkata - "Tatkal charges should not have been increased as it's already expensive and you don't get a refund if you miss the train. Even if prices are increased, the quality of food in trains should improve as it is really bad."

Mahesh Chandra Rajoria, 62, retired government official - "Rail fares should have been hiked for the development of the county. Hiking fares was a necessity. It was not hiked because elections are due next year."

Inder Mohan, 63, retired government employee - "It is important for the government to increase fares minimally because there is so much inflation. The government does a lot of expenditure. They also have to pay salaries to railway employees so they need the money."

(Reporting by Arnika Thakur and Sankalp Phartiyal from New Delhi railway station)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Monsoon Forecast

Monsoon Forecast

South Asia monsoon seen below-average to average in 2014 - WMO.  Full Article 

Solar Dispute

Solar Dispute

Green groups urge U.S. to drop solar trade case against India.  Full Article 

Oil Imports

Oil Imports

India to make May-July oil payments to Iran - sources.  Full Article 

Facebook Earnings

Facebook Earnings

Facebook Q1 revenue grows 72 percent on rising mobile ads.  Full Article 

DLF Shares

DLF Shares

DLF slides 3 percent, underperforms rivals.  Full Article 

Rice Exports

Rice Exports

India may cede top rice exporter spot under Southeast Asian price onslaught.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage