CEO Fired

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Rate Cut Hopes

Rate Cut Hopes

BarCap expects bigger rate cuts in India in 2013.  Full Article 

Rupee Low

Rupee Low

Rupee hits 2013 low on importer demand, weak euro  Full Article | Related Story 

Xbox One

Xbox One

Microsoft unveils Xbox One with Spielberg, Activision tie-up.  Full Article 

Vodafone Result

Vodafone Result

Vodafone keeps Verizon payout to make up for European slump  Full Article 

Tumblr Bought

Tumblr Bought

Yahoo's rise in Asia offsets risk from Tumblr bet  Full Article 

Bond Business

Bond Business

RBI says foreign investors may buy inflation-linked bonds  Full Article | Related Story 

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Buy, Sell or Hold?

Confused while buying stocks? Get buy, sell or hold recommendations from VantageTrade.  Full Coverage 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage 

No consensus on land reform bill in all-party meet

Stocks

   
Track BSE Sectoral Indices

Track Markets: BSE Sectoral Indices

Track and analyse performance of all BSE sectoral indices and other global indices on a single page.   Full Coverage 

1 of 2. A farmer removes dried plants from his parched paddy field at Narimanpura village, on the outskirts of Ahmedabad July 30, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Amit Dave/Files

NEW DELHI | Thu Mar 7, 2013 8:08pm IST

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Political parties failed on Thursday to agree on how to compensate farmers for land acquired for infrastructure and industrial projects, dashing market hopes of a breakthrough.

The government wants parliament to pass a bill aimed at speeding up dozens of major projects throttled by India's notoriously slow land acquisition process, at a time when the economy is in sharp slowdown.

The land acquisition bill proposes to overturn land ownership laws that date back to the 19th century and is seen as a potential vote winner for the ruling Congress party, which faces a general election in just over a year's time. The cabinet approved the bill in December, but it still faces opposition in parliament and has already undergone about 160 amendments.

Shares in real estate firms had risen up to 11 percent in the run-up to Thursday's all-party meeting, a rise that several traders attributed to market hopes of a consensus.

Businesses fret that the bill will raise project costs. The law could oblige them to pay up to four times the market price for land in rural areas and twice the market price in urban areas, and give displaced people homes and jobs.

It also requires four-fifths of all the landholders to agree to the sale to a company before any land can be acquired.

"The meeting is inconclusive," said Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath after the meeting. "This is an important piece of legislation. We are trying to evolve as much consensus as possible, if not unanimity."

The government wants parliament to approve the bill during the current session, which ends on May 10. However, the Trinamool Congress (TMC), a powerful regional party, opposes the bill on grounds that the government should not get involved in land acquisition at all.

Communist parties want the bill sent to a parliamentary standing committee for further consultation, given the large number of amendments.

In theory, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government does not need cross-party consensus to push the bill through. But it has typically tried to find as much agreement as possible for politically sensitive legislation.

Investors say that while the bill is likely to raise project costs, it will also bring policy clarity to the process of land acquisition.

Market watchers say the bill, once passed, will likely boost the share price of companies like DLF Ltd (DLF.NS), India's largest real estate developer, Sobha (SOBH.NS), Unitech and Prestige (PREG.NS), which own large tracts of land.

(Reporting by Nigam Prusty, Aditi Shah and Abhishek Vishnoi; writing by Matthias Williams; Editing by Ron Popeski)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.