Breakingviews:Bank rule loophole on mortgages should be a no-no

Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:15am IST

Photo

Photo

Stocks

   

(The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.)

By Agnes T. Crane

NEW YORK, March 18 (Reuters Breakingviews) - A regulatory loophole on mortgage servicing should be a no-no. Basel III should, once fully implemented, prevent any one U.S. bank from being too dominant at managing the nuts and bolts of home loans. It will impose a punitive charge if more than 10 percent of a bank's capital is dedicated to supporting the business. But there's a way for lenders to get mortgage servicing rights off the balance sheet yet keep the income. That risks adding more confusion to a complex part of the market.

MSRs are a quirk of U.S. mortgage finance. They’re an estimate of a bank's future revenue from processing payments of home loans. They can also be a handy fillip to a bank's earnings as they're worth more when rates rise, offsetting a potential drop in mortgage lending. But the crisis laid bare conflicts of interest and poor business practices. The top five players recently paid a $25 billion fine.

Bank of America (BAC.N), Citi (C.N) and JPMorgan (JPM.N) have been reducing their market share in the MSR market. Wells Fargo (WFC.N), though, has held steady. As of the end of 2012 its MSRs were already running up against the Basel III capital cap. Breaching the limit would mean having to hold capital of 1,250 percent against the excess.

That's why its executives have flirted with the idea of selling some MSRs and then leasing back the day-to-day business. It has been done before by servicing specialist Ocwen Financial (OCN.N), which is not subject to bank capital rules. Wells' finance chief Tim Sloan recently said the bank's in no hurry to do anything. But it would not necessarily just have to win more business to tip over the limit: an increase in interest rates would push up the MSR value and the amount of capital needed.

The problem with such transactions is that they push the owners of the MSRs one step further away from borrowers. That can create even more confusion about who is legally and financially responsible for the assets, which would make any future large-scale mortgage defaults even harder to resolve. Moreover, buyers may be non-banks, which would push the assets into the less regulated shadow banking system.

It may be that Wells and whoever might buy the MSRs could devise enough checks and balances to make it work. But if there's no clear benefit to borrowers, regulators should find a way to stop it.

<^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

SIGN UP FOR BREAKINGVIEWS EMAIL ALERTS: www.breakingviews.com/TOPNewsSubscription

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^>

CONTEXT NEWS

- Wells Fargo Chief Financial Officer Tim Sloan said on March 5 that the bank isn’t in any hurry to sell its mortgage servicing rights. “We’ve got an adequate level of capital,” he said during an investor conference.

- Wells serviced $1.9 trillion of mortgages in the fourth quarter, making it the largest mortgage servicer in the country, according to RBS. The bank valued its mortgage servicing rights at $11.5 billion at the end of last year. The capital required to run that business equates to 10 percent of the bank's Tier 1 common equity under Basel III.

- Basel III is expected to cap a bank’s mortgage servicing rights at 10 percent of Tier 1 common equity. If that limit is breached, the excess valuation will be assessed a charge of 1,250 percent against capital.

RELATED COLUMNS

All mucked up [ID:nL1E8K17JM]

Runaway leader [ID:nL2E8IC3GW]

- For previous columns by the author, Reuters customers can click on [CRANE/]

(Editing by Antony Currie and Martin Langfield)

((agnes.crane@thomsonreuters.com)(Reuters messaging agnes.crane.thomsonreuters.com@reuters.net)) Keywords: BREAKINGVIEWS USA/MORTGAGES

(C) Reuters 2012. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing, or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared