DMK withdraws from UPA coalition, reforms at risk

NEW DELHI Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:23pm IST

M. Karunanidhi,leader of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party, speaks during a meeting at party headquarters in Chennai March 8, 2011. REUTERS/Babu/Files

M. Karunanidhi,leader of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party, speaks during a meeting at party headquarters in Chennai March 8, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Babu/Files

Related Topics

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) pulled out of the ruling UPA coalition on Tuesday, jeopardising Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's economic reforms but posing no immediate threat to the minority government, which can survive with the support of other parties.

The withdrawal of the DMK could hamper the government's efforts to rein in the budget deficit, spur growth in Asia's third-largest economy and stave off the threat of a downgrade by global credit ratings agencies.

DMK leader M. Karunanidhi told a press conference the party would not offer outside support to the government and would withdraw its five central ministers on Tuesday or Wednesday.

In a possible sign of policy paralysis to come, a powerful regional party that supports the government in parliament, the Samajwadi Party (SP), said it would not back bills aimed at liberalising pensions and insurance. The government had hoped to pass the reforms in this session of parliament.

"With the federal elections next year, political stability is key for all economic reforms. This will surely delay the economic reforms to some extent," said Rupa Rege Nitsure, chief economist, Bank Of Baroda, Mumbai.

In other reform bills, the government wants to change land acquisition laws to make it easier for companies to buy land for industrial and infrastructure projects. Also planned are a food security bill to provide subsidised more grain for the poor, the setting up of an anti-graft ombudsman and the approval of an ordinance providing for harsher punishment for perpetrators of sex crimes.

The DMK, which draws its support from Tamils, announced its withdrawal from the coalition in protest against the government's perceived dithering on a U.N. resolution on war crimes in neighbouring Sri Lanka between that country's Sinhalese-majority government and its own minority Tamils.

It was not immediately clear what impact the withdrawal of the DMK would have on the bills as the party has previously expressed support for the land acquisition and food security measures.

But the withdrawal heightens the chance that the government will call a snap national election if it is unable to pass major legislation, although neither the ruling Congress party nor the main opposition have shown much appetite for early polls. Elections need to be held by May 2014.

"The government has lost majority. All the reforms including insurance and pension will now be put on the back burner," said Rajiv Pratap Rudy, a spokesman for the main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

BJP leaders said they had no immediate plans to call for a confidence vote in parliament.

Finance Minister P. Chidambaram said the government was stable, adding there was a chance the DMK could change its mind. The DMK has climbed down in the past after threatening to withdraw from the coalition.

"There is no crisis," Chidambaram told reporters.

AT THE MERCY

But the coalition, already a minority in parliament, will be more than ever at the mercy of powerful but fickle regional parties for support, especially the SP and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), both based in Uttar Pradesh state.

Bonds, Sensex and the rupee fell on the news of the DMK's withdrawal.

The DMK has often pressured the government to do more to protect Sri Lanka's minority Tamil population.

It wants the government to introduce stronger language into the U.N. resolution, including the use of the word "genocide" to describe the deaths of Tamils during Sri Lanka's civil war. The government has yet to give a response on what its position on the resolution would be.

The DMK has 18 seats in the lower of house of parliament, which made it the biggest ally in Singh's coalition. Its pullout is the latest blow, following the withdrawal of another ally, the Trinamool Congress, last year in protest against the government's reforms.

The government needs 271 seats out of 543 to survive any possible confidence vote. After the pullout of the DMK, the Congress alliance has about 235 seats, but they could narrowly survive any vote with the outside support of the BSP and SP.

(Reporting by Annie Banerji, Devidutta Tripathy, Satarupa Bhattacharjya and Nita Bhalla, Anupama Chandrasekaran, Nigam Prusty, Sharat Pradhan, Mumbai markets and treasury teams; editing by Ross Colvin and Raju Gopalakrishnan)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Subrabhama wrote:
Unnatural vices are fathered by our virtues. Alliance with local groups like DMK which have no larger economic or political ideology other than narrow limited issues having high emotive appeal. The UPA-I should blame itself for depending such an ally. For too long, Mr. Karunidhi has been either blackmailing the center or getting undue benefits disproportionate to the number he commands. Some day or other the arrangement has to fall apart. It is good that it has come about now. Of course, the UPA-II will limp all the way to face the elections in 2014 and, in the meantime, there will be no noises about the so called reforms.

Mar 19, 2013 5:23pm IST  --  Report as abuse
Subrabhama wrote:
Unnatural vices are fathered by our virtues. Alliance with local groups like DMK which have no larger economic or political ideology other than narrow limited issues having high emotive appeal. The UPA-I should blame itself for depending such an ally. For too long, Mr. Karunidhi has been either blackmailing the center or getting undue benefits disproportionate to the number he commands. Some day or other the arrangement has to fall apart. It is good that it has come about now. Of course, the UPA-II will limp all the way to face the elections in 2014 and, in the meantime, there will be no noises about the so called reforms.

Mar 19, 2013 5:23pm IST  --  Report as abuse
amma wrote:
Reforms may be at risk but the entire Tamil population in Srilanka is at huge risk of genocide and justice must be done to bring the barbarians of the war criminals behind the bars.

Mar 19, 2013 6:57pm IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Scotland Referendum

Scotland Referendum

Scots vote in record numbers, await independence verdict.  Full Article 

India-US Diplomacy

India-US Diplomacy

Obama to nominate Indian-American Richard Verma as India ambassador - congressional source.  Full Article 

GMR in Nepal

GMR in Nepal

Nepal clears India’s GMR plan for $1.4 bln hydroelectric plant.  Full Article 

LIC on Markets

LIC on Markets

LIC chairman bullish on Indian markets  Full Article 

India Rains

India Rains

Monsoon rains weaken as late retreat looms.  Full Article 

Ellison Quits

Ellison Quits

Oracle's Ellison steps aside, co-CEOs Catz and Hurd take over.  Full Article 

Infosys-Huawei

Infosys-Huawei

Infosys partners with China's Huawei for cloud-based services  Full Article 

Gold Outlook

Gold Outlook

Gold imports seen up, premiums likely to double on festive buying  Full Article 

Trade Dispute

Trade Dispute

U.S. to press India on trade row during Modi's Washington visit  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage