JPMorgan investors urge split of chairman, CEO roles in letter

NEW YORK Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:15pm IST

A man walks past JP Morgan Chase's international headquarters on Park Avenue in New York July 13, 2012. REUTERS/Andrew Burton/Files

A man walks past JP Morgan Chase's international headquarters on Park Avenue in New York July 13, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Burton/Files

Related Topics

Stocks

   
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, daughter of Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi, adjusts her flower garlands as she campaigns for her mother during an election meeting at Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh April 22, 2014. REUTERS/Pawan Kumar

Election 2014

More than 814 million people — a number larger than the population of Europe — are eligible to vote in the world’s biggest democratic exercise.  Full Coverage 

NEW YORK (Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) should split the roles of chairman and chief executive officer to restore credibility with regulators and manage the bank more effectively, a group of investors said in a letter to other shareholders on Monday.

The investors, including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, Hermes Fund Managers and the New York City Pension Funds, have a proposal on JPMorgan's proxy to split those roles.

If approved, the proposal would be another blow for the largest U.S. bank and its chairman and CEO, Jamie Dimon.

JPMorgan has a presiding director, former Exxon Mobil Corp (XOM.N) Chairman and CEO Lee R. Raymond, who approves the board's agenda and meeting schedules, and facilitates communication with the CEO. But the investor group says Dimon wields too much power.

"An independent chair of the board of directors will eliminate the structural conflict of interest caused by the CEO being his own boss, and will clarify where the authority of the CEO ends and responsibility of the board begins," the investors said in their letter.

A similar proposal AFSCME made for JPMorgan last year was defeated. However, the bank's $6.2 billion loss on a derivatives trade, called the "London Whale" because of its size, has put management under more pressure.

The trade went undetected by management until it started hemorrhaging money. That led to questions about JPMorgan's risk-management culture, which had previously been seen as pristine. A U.S. Senate subcommittee report on March 15 criticized management for failing to catch the bad trade earlier.

In the proxy, JPMorgan's board advised against voting for the investors' proposal, saying the performance of the bank has been strong under its current leadership setup and that its actions following the Whale losses "demonstrate strong, independent oversight."

JPMorgan reported record earnings in 2012 despite losses from the bad trade, and its shares have outperformed those of rivals. After the Whale trade was uncovered, management set up an internal task force to review losses, and the board established an independent review committee as well.

"The Board has determined that the most effective leadership model for the Firm currently is that Mr. Dimon serves as both Chairman and Chief Executive Officer," it said in JPMorgan's proxy.

(Reporting by Lauren Tara LaCapra; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Asian Markets

Asian Markets

Asian stocks flat after China PMI meets expectations  Full Article 

Chinese Economy

Chinese Economy

Factory activity shrinks for 4th month; pace of decline slows   Full Article 

International Gold

International Gold

Gold hovers near 2-1/2 month lows on firm equities, fund outflows  Full Article 

GM Lawsuit

GM Lawsuit

GM seeks U.S. court protection against ignition lawsuits  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage