COLUMN-Crude export ban benefits only U.S. refiners: Kemp

Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:04pm IST

Related Topics

Stocks

   
Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, daughter of Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi, adjusts her flower garlands as she campaigns for her mother during an election meeting at Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh April 22, 2014. REUTERS/Pawan Kumar

Election 2014

More than 814 million people — a number larger than the population of Europe — are eligible to vote in the world’s biggest democratic exercise.  Full Coverage 

By John Kemp

LONDON Jan 13 (Reuters) - It is a great time to be an oil refiner, at least if you are located in the central United States and have access to light oil from North Dakota's Bakken formation and similar crudes trapped in the region by transport bottlenecks and the export ban.

While refiners in Western Europe struggle with overcapacity in the global refining system and face pressure to close some of their facilities, their rivals in the United States are benefiting handsomely from locational advantages and outdated protectionism.

Valero Energy Corporation, the largest pure refiner in the United States, has seen its stock price almost quadruple from $14 to $53 since August 2010.

The refiner has benefited from buying stranded domestic light crude at steep discounts while selling gasoline and diesel at prices linked to international benchmarks.

While all of Valero's refineries have reported good throughput margins since late 2010, the company's three refineries in the midcontinent area (Ardmore, McKee and Memphis) which process mainly light crudes from inland areas have been by far the best performers (Chart 1).

Throughput margin measures the difference between the purchase price at which refineries buy crude and other feedstocks and the price they achieve for the sales of their products such as gasoline and diesel.

For most of 2011, 2012 and 2013, Valero's midcontinent refineries were achieving throughput margins of between $10 and $22 on every barrel of oil they processed, according to Valero's own quarterly operating reports (Chart 2).

Refineries in the midcontinent achieved far higher throughput margins than those on the coasts, where crude acquisitions are more closely tied to international benchmarks like Brent.

***************************************

Chart 1:

Chart 2:

Chart 3:

***************************************

Midcontinent refineries account for under 20 percent of Valero's total throughput but they process almost entirely light sweet and sour crudes from domestic oil producers who have nowhere else to sell their output and the refineries have contributed disproportionately to the company's profitability in recent years.

Valero is a good proxy for other refiners with midcontinent assets. Others have also been highly profitable thanks to transport constraints and the export ban.

In the first nine months of 2013, midcontinent refineries contributed almost 36 percent of Valero's operating income from refining, despite processing just 16 percent of the crude oil and other feedstocks.

The midcontinent refineries made similar outsized contributions to income in 2012 and 2011, according to the company's financial statements.

So it comes as no surprise that Valero has been the first refiner to speak out in favour of retaining the U.S. ban on crude oil exports.

"It makes more sense to keep crude oil here in the U.S.," a company spokesman said last Tuesday. The current export controls, which largely prohibit exports of unrefined crude except to Canada, are "working well", he added.

The export ban "has significantly reduced American dependence on foreign oil, kept U.S. refining utilisation high, and insulated American consumers from geopolitical shocks," according to the spokesman.

He might have added that the ban has also contributed mightily to the company's profitability and its stellar stock price performance in the last three years (Chart 3).

The high profitability of midcontinent refineries processing crude from the Bakken and other shale formations is one reason to doubt that U.S. motorists derive much benefit from the export ban.

Refineries appear to have successfully captured much of the "rent" created by the export ban. There is no evidence that they pass on discounted crude prices to consumers in the form of cheaper gasoline and diesel.

Although U.S. refiners claim lifting the ban would raise gasoline prices for U.S. motorists, and make them more volatile, the principal impact would be to shrink the refining margins currently earned by refineries in the central United States. Motorists are unlikely to see any increase in the cost of filling up.

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Monsoon Forecast

Monsoon Forecast

South Asia monsoon seen below-average to average in 2014 - WMO.  Full Article 

Solar Dispute

Solar Dispute

Green groups urge U.S. to drop solar trade case against India.  Full Article 

Oil Imports

Oil Imports

India to make May-July oil payments to Iran - sources.  Full Article 

Facebook Earnings

Facebook Earnings

Facebook Q1 revenue grows 72 percent on rising mobile ads.  Full Article 

DLF Shares

DLF Shares

DLF slides 3 percent, underperforms rivals.  Full Article 

Rice Exports

Rice Exports

India may cede top rice exporter spot under Southeast Asian price onslaught.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage