U.S. justices referee "Raging Bull" copyright fight

WASHINGTON Wed Jan 22, 2014 3:33am IST

From left to right, Robert DeNiro, Cathy Moriarty, Jake LaMotta and Martin Scorsese pose for photographers the 25th anniversary screening of the film 'Raging Bull,' in New York, January 27, 2005. REUTERS/Chip East/Files

From left to right, Robert DeNiro, Cathy Moriarty, Jake LaMotta and Martin Scorsese pose for photographers the 25th anniversary screening of the film 'Raging Bull,' in New York, January 27, 2005.

Credit: Reuters/Chip East/Files

Stocks

   
Rajalakshmi (C), 28, smiles after winning the Miss Wheelchair India beauty pageant in Mumbai November 26, 2014. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui

Miss Wheelchair India

Seven women from across India participated in the country's second wheelchair beauty pageant, which aims to open doors for the wheelchair-bound in modelling, film and television, according to organisers  Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices sparred on Tuesday over how to resolve a copyright dispute concerning an early screenplay for what became the iconic boxing movie "Raging Bull."

Lawyers on both sides failed to deliver a knockout blow during the hour-long oral argument concerning the critically acclaimed movie about the life of champion boxer Jake LaMotta, nicknamed Raging Bull.

The court is hearing a claim brought by Paula Petrella, daughter of deceased screenwriter Frank Petrella. She says MGM Holdings Inc(MGMB.PK) and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment owe her money for infringing the copyright of a 1963 screenplay upon which she alleges the movie was based. Fox, a subsidiary of Twenty-First Century Fox Inc(FOXA.O) is a defendant because it has the rights to distribute MGM movies on DVD.

The 1980 movie, starring Robert DeNiro and directed by Martin Scorsese, won two Academy Awards in 1981, including the best actor award for DeNiro.

The legal question is whether MGM can argue in its defense that Petrella, who sued in 2009, waited too long to assert her claim.

The Motion Picture Association of America and other industry groups say a ruling for Petrella could discourage studios, publishers and distributors from reissuing old movies because unexpected copyright claims years after an original release could lead to years of litigation.

Groups representing authors, including Authors Guild Inc, have filed court papers in support of Petrella.

During the dense legal argument, few of the nine justices indicated how they would vote, although several indicated some sympathy for MGM's position.

Justice Antonin Scalia told Petrella's lawyer, Stephanos Bibas, that MGM had acted in good faith.

"They invested substantial amounts of money, and then, when that money starts to pay off, you file suit and you get three years' worth of their profits," he said.

In an exchange with MGM's lawyer, Mark Perry, Justice Sonia Sotomayor voiced some support for Petrella.

Perry said that by seeking damages at such a late date, Petrella was trying to "skin the cream" after MGM had invested a considerable amount of money.

"What's so bad about that?" Sotomayor said.

Petrella, who inherited rights to the screenplay upon her father's death in 1981, sued when MGM was marketing the movie on DVD, including a new Blu-ray edition. MGM says it spent almost $8.5 million on the re-release.

A federal district court judge in the Central District of California and the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals both ruled in favor of MGM.

A ruling is expected by the end of June. The case is Petrella v. MGM, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-1315.

(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Howard Goller and David Gregorio)

Showbiz

REUTERS SHOWCASE

Jamini Roy

Jamini Roy

Photo Gallery – Bengali household name Jamini Roy’s paintings  Full Article 

A Minute With

A Minute With

'Sunny' Charlie Day on oddballs, 'Horrible Bosses'  Full Article 

Arab Singer Dies

Arab Singer Dies

Lebanese singer Sabah dies at 87  Full Article 

Book Talk

Book Talk

Pack of Thieves? Convict-era Australia stacks the deck  Full Article 

Ferguson Impact

Ferguson Impact

Garth Brooks cancels TV appearances amid Ferguson unrest  Full Article 

Canada Sex Case

Canada Sex Case

Canadian celebrity radio host charged with sexual assault  Full Article 

Broadway in Cuba

Broadway in Cuba

Broadway finds a new stage in an old venue: Cuba  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device  Full Coverage