Apple urges U.S. appeals court to void 'radical' e-books ruling

NEW YORK Wed Feb 26, 2014 9:06pm IST

A member of the media holds the new iPad mini with Retnia display during an Apple event in San Francisco, California October 22, 2013. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith/Files

A member of the media holds the new iPad mini with Retnia display during an Apple event in San Francisco, California October 22, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith/Files

Related Topics



NEW YORK (Reuters) - Apple Inc (AAPL.O) urged a U.S. appeals court to throw out a judge's "radical" finding that it violated antitrust law by manipulating electronic book prices, and blamed publishers for running a conspiracy it claimed to know nothing about.

The request on Tuesday night came after U.S. District Judge Denise Cote in New York concluded last July after a nonjury trial that Apple had played a "central role" in illegally scheming as early as December 2009 with five publishers to raise e-book prices and impede competitors such as Inc (AMZN.O).

The publishers previously agreed to pay more than $166 million to settle related antitrust charges.

Apple introduced e-books in 2010 to help boost sales for its then-new iPad tablet.

In a filing with the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, Apple said it "had no knowledge that the publishers were engaged in a conspiracy" at any time.

It said it lawfully took advantage of market "discord" and the publishers' own frustrations with Amazon, and "kick-started competition in a highly concentrated market, delivering higher output, lower price levels, and accelerated innovation."

Cote's decision "is a radical departure from modern antitrust law," Apple said. "If allowed to stand, the ruling will stifle innovation, chill competition, and harm consumers."

The Cupertino, California-based company asked the 2nd Circuit to reverse Cote's decision or else give it a new trial before a different judge.

Apple also again faulted Cote's appointment of Washington lawyer Michael Bromwich to monitor its antitrust compliance, calling that oversight unconstitutional.

The U.S. Department of Justice, which brought the case, was not immediately available on Wednesday for comment. That agency is expected to reply in writing to Apple's request.

In her decision, Cote also found Apple liable to 33 U.S. states for antitrust violations. She is expected to consider possible damages later this year. Apple said the states and private plaintiffs sought more than $800 million of damages.

On February 10, the 2nd Circuit rejected Apple's request to halt Bromwich's oversight during its appeal.

The case is U.S. v. Apple Inc, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 13-3741.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)

Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared


Reuters Showcase

Sapphire Screen

Sapphire Screen

Xiaomi ordered sapphire glass for limited edition phone - S.Korea newspaper.  Full Article 

Anti-Trust Probe

Anti-Trust Probe

Qualcomm will strive for resolution to China anti-trust probe-regulator.  Full Article 


Privacy Violation

Class action against Facebook attracts 60,000 users.  Full Article 

Taxi to Space

Taxi to Space

Boeing says completed key design review for space taxi.  Full Article 

PayPal Unit

PayPal Unit

EBay considering PayPal spinoff - report.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage