U.S. judge OKs class action in e-book suit against Apple

NEW YORK Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:01am IST

The Apple logo is pictured at its flagship retail store in San Francisco, California January 27, 2014. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith/Files

The Apple logo is pictured at its flagship retail store in San Francisco, California January 27, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith/Files

Related Topics

Stocks

   

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge in New York granted class certification on Friday to a group of consumers who sued Apple Inc (AAPL.O) for conspiring with five major publishers to fix e-book prices in violation of antitrust law.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote said the plaintiffs had "more than met their burden" to allow them to sue as a group. She rejected Apple's contentions that the claims were too different from each other, or that some plaintiffs were not harmed because some e-book prices fell.

"This is a paradigmatic antitrust class action," wrote Cote, who has scheduled a trial later this year to determine damages, which could reach hundreds of millions of dollars.

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment.

In July 2013, Cote found the technology company liable for colluding with the publishers after a separate non-jury trial in a case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice. Cote found that Apple took part in a price-fixing conspiracy to fight online retailer Amazon.com Inc's (AMZN.O) dominance in the e-book market.

Apple is appealing that decision.

Thirty-three states and U.S. territories have separately sued on behalf of their consumers, while individual consumers in other states and territories filed the class action lawsuit that Cote addressed on Friday. The plaintiffs are seeking more than $800 million in damages.

The publishers previously agreed to settle related antitrust charges for $166 million before trial.

Apple has asked the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to throw out Cote's ruling from last year, as well as her decision to appoint an external monitor to oversee the company's antitrust compliance, a move Apple has called "radical" in court filings.

The 2nd Circuit last month rejected Apple's request to halt the monitor's oversight while its appeal is pending.

Cote on Friday also denied Apple's motion to exclude the opinions of the plaintiffs' damages expert. In a separate ruling, Cote largely threw out the opinions of Apple's two damages experts, saying they were not based on "rigorous application of economic methods."

Steve Berman of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, the plaintiffs' lead lawyer, said, "We are thrilled with the win."

The trial will likely take place in either July or September.

The consolidated case is In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 11-md-02293.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Jonathan Oatis)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

New Windows

Reuters Showcase

Netflix Deal

Netflix Deal

Netflix 'Crouching Tiger' deal incurs wrath of theater chains.  Full Article 

PayPal Spinoff

PayPal Spinoff

EBay follows Icahn's advice, plans PayPal spinoff in 2015.  Full Article 

Oracle Convention

Oracle Convention

Larry Ellison still the top draw at Oracle's mega-convention  Full Article 

iPhone 6 in China

iPhone 6 in China

With iPhone 6 approved in China, Apple suppliers ready for demand.  Full Article 

Tax Rules

Tax Rules

EU says Ireland swapped Apple tax deal for jobs.  Full Article 

Music Services

Music Services

Google searches for right note in online music business.  Full Article 

E-Commerce Dispute

E-Commerce Dispute

Amazon, Disney appear close to settling dispute over movies - WSJ.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage