U.S. judge OKs class action in e-book suit against Apple

NEW YORK Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:01am IST

The Apple logo is pictured at its flagship retail store in San Francisco, California January 27, 2014. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith/Files

The Apple logo is pictured at its flagship retail store in San Francisco, California January 27, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith/Files

Related Topics

Stocks

   

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge in New York granted class certification on Friday to a group of consumers who sued Apple Inc (AAPL.O) for conspiring with five major publishers to fix e-book prices in violation of antitrust law.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote said the plaintiffs had "more than met their burden" to allow them to sue as a group. She rejected Apple's contentions that the claims were too different from each other, or that some plaintiffs were not harmed because some e-book prices fell.

"This is a paradigmatic antitrust class action," wrote Cote, who has scheduled a trial later this year to determine damages, which could reach hundreds of millions of dollars.

An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment.

In July 2013, Cote found the technology company liable for colluding with the publishers after a separate non-jury trial in a case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice. Cote found that Apple took part in a price-fixing conspiracy to fight online retailer Amazon.com Inc's (AMZN.O) dominance in the e-book market.

Apple is appealing that decision.

Thirty-three states and U.S. territories have separately sued on behalf of their consumers, while individual consumers in other states and territories filed the class action lawsuit that Cote addressed on Friday. The plaintiffs are seeking more than $800 million in damages.

The publishers previously agreed to settle related antitrust charges for $166 million before trial.

Apple has asked the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to throw out Cote's ruling from last year, as well as her decision to appoint an external monitor to oversee the company's antitrust compliance, a move Apple has called "radical" in court filings.

The 2nd Circuit last month rejected Apple's request to halt the monitor's oversight while its appeal is pending.

Cote on Friday also denied Apple's motion to exclude the opinions of the plaintiffs' damages expert. In a separate ruling, Cote largely threw out the opinions of Apple's two damages experts, saying they were not based on "rigorous application of economic methods."

Steve Berman of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, the plaintiffs' lead lawyer, said, "We are thrilled with the win."

The trial will likely take place in either July or September.

The consolidated case is In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 11-md-02293.

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by Jonathan Oatis)

FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared

SURVEILLANCE

TECH SHOWCASE

Wearable Gadgets

Wearable Gadgets

Swatch plans fitness-based touch wristwatch, CEO tells paper.  Full Article 

Surprise Inspections

Surprise Inspections

Microsoft says government officials make sudden visits to China offices.  Full Article 

Xbox Marketing

Xbox Marketing

JD.com to sell Microsoft's Xbox One games console in China.  Full Article 

Testing Times

Testing Times

Analysis - Amazon's far-reaching ambitions, lack of profits, unnerve investors.  Full Article 

IPO Probe Over

IPO Probe Over

Facebook says SEC's IPO probe ends, extending WhatsApp closing date  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage