Google reverses decision to delete British newspaper links

Fri Jul 4, 2014 8:06am IST

A Google search page is reflected in sunglasses in this photo illustration taken in Brussels May 30, 2014.  REUTERS/Francois Lenoir/Files

A Google search page is reflected in sunglasses in this photo illustration taken in Brussels May 30, 2014.

Credit: Reuters/Francois Lenoir/Files

Related Topics

Stocks

   

REUTERS - Google Inc (GOOGL.O) (GOOG.O) on Thursday reversed its decision to remove several links to stories in Britain's Guardian newspaper, underscoring the difficulty the search engine is having implementing Europe's "right to be forgotten" ruling.

The Guardian protested the removal of its stories describing how a soccer referee lied about reversing a penalty decision. It was unclear who asked Google to remove the stories.

Separately, Google has not restored links to a BBC article that described how former Merrill Lynch Chief Executive Officer E. Stanley O'Neal was ousted after the investment bank racked up billions of dollars in losses.

The incidents underscore the uncertainty around how Google intends to adhere to a May European court ruling that gave its citizens the "right to be forgotten:" to request the scrubbing of links to articles that pop up under a name search.

Privacy advocates say the backlash around press censorship highlight the potential dangers of the ruling and its unwieldiness in practice. That in turn may benefit Google by stirring debate about the soundness of the ruling, which the Internet search leader criticized the ruling from the outset.

Google, which has received more than 70,000 requests, began acting upon them in past days. And it notified the BBC and the Guardian, which in turn publicized the moves.

The incidents suggest that requesting removal of a link may actually bring the issue back into the public spotlight, rather than obscure it. That possibility may give people pause before submitting a "right to be forgotten" request.

"At least as it looks now, there are definitely some unworkable components," said Electronic Frontier Foundation activist Parker Higgins. "We've seen a number of situations in the past few days, where somebody in an effort to get a certain thing forgotten has brought more attention to it than ever was there before."

"It does make you think that maybe if you're actually trying to make an episode of your history be forgotten, this channel maybe isn’t the best way."

Google's objective is to protect the reliability and effectiveness of its search franchise. It remains uncertain how it adjudicates requests, or how they intend to carry them out going forward.

"Their current approach appears to be an overly broad interpretation," a spokeswoman for the Guardian said. "If the purpose of the judgment is not to enable censorship of publishers by the back door, then we'd encourage Google to be transparent about the criteria it is using to make these decisions, and how publishers can challenge them."

Google, which controls more than 90 percent of European online searches, said it was a learning process. “This is a new and evolving process for us. We’ll continue to listen to feedback and will also work with data protection authorities and others as we comply with the ruling,” the company said in a statement.

Notifying media outlets about scrubbed links has the effect of enhancing transparency, privacy advocates say. It might also prompt European courts to re-examine aspects of the ruling, including how it affects media outlets' coverage.

"It’s terra incognito for everyone," said Jonathan Zittrain, co-founder of the Berkman Center for Internet and Society. "If sites that receive the notices choose to publicize them in ways that end up boomeranging against the people requesting, that might cause the courts to examine what those sites are doing."

(Reporting by Alexei Oreskovic in San Francisco and Aurindom Mukherjee in Bangalore; Editing by Kirti Pandey and Lisa Shumaker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
SinghDeepak wrote:
It understandable. Since Google simply lists the links to webpages where some other organization or individual has used the name of an individual, it is not practical to direct google alone to head ‘forget me’ requests.

The search results get de-listed from google when the ‘source’ is deleted. So google in fact is a perfect tool to know how many notices are to be sent for ‘removal of content’.

This ruling can be misused especially by the businessmen and public figures to clean up their profiles by getting the search results about them omitted.

For example, removal of E. Stanley O’Neal stories by BBC from search results can be equated to a news paper vendor forced by law to black out some pages of a newspaper before selling it. BBC should have been directly requested to remove those stories, and I am sure it was requested and those requests were denied. It appears like indirect oppression of the press.

Google, however can be requested to delete the cached versions of the results removed by the source. Users on the other hand, should learn the basic netlife skill to measure their written words and actions well. Because this is information age and pretty much every activity of every human can be documented one way or the other and that documentation eventually finds it’s place in public domain.

Google is a messenger we can’t afford to kill.

Jul 04, 2014 10:46am IST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

  • Most Popular
  • Most Shared
A staff of a China Mobile shop explains a function of the iPhone 5s to a customer in Beijing January 17, 2014. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon/Files

Apple revenue lags Street's view despite strong China growth

Apple posted a smaller-than-expected 6 percent rise in quarterly revenue on Tuesday, but revenue surged 28 percent in greater China despite stiff competition in its third-largest market.  Full Article 

TECH SHOWCASE

Privacy Lawsuit

Privacy Lawsuit

Google must face U.S. privacy lawsuit over commingled user data.  Full Article 

New Launch

New Launch

China's Xiaomi announces latest flagship Mi 4 smartphone.  Full Article 

Class Action

Class Action

Google must face class action over kids' in-apps purchases.  Full Article 

Black Hat Conference

Black Hat Conference

Talk on cracking Internet anonymity service Tor canceled.  Full Article 

Nano-Printing

Nano-Printing

Monet masterpiece shrunk down to the size of dust mite.  Video 

Management Changes

Management Changes

BlackBerry names ex-Sybase executive as chief operating officer.  Full Article 

Reuters India Mobile

Reuters India Mobile

Get the latest news on the go. Visit Reuters India on your mobile device.  Full Coverage