April 21, 2017 / 8:09 PM / 3 months ago

Fitch Affirms Kazakhstan at 'BBB'; Outlook Stable

16 Min Read

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) PARIS/LONDON, April 21 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Kazakhstan's Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) at 'BBB' with Stable Outlooks. The issue ratings on Kazakhstan's senior unsecured foreign-currency bonds have also been affirmed at 'BBB'. The Short-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency IDRs have been affirmed at 'F2'. The Country Ceiling has been affirmed at 'BBB+'. KEY RATING DRIVERS Kazakhstan's IDRs balance strong public and external balance sheets, underpinned by large government savings and a substantial sovereign net foreign asset position, against high commodity dependence, a weak banking sector, weak governance indicators and a volatile macroeconomic performance compared with 'BBB' peers. The economy's gradual adjustment to the large oil price shock of recent years is continuing, facilitated by exchange rate flexibility, monetary policy reforms, restructuring of the banking sector and fiscal stimulus. The IMF-defined general government deficit is forecast to widen to 7.7% of GDP in 2017 from an estimated 5.0% in 2016, due to the recapitalisation (at an estimated one-off cost of 4.2% of GDP to the budget) of the country's largest bank, Kazkommertsbank (CC/Rating Watch Evolving, KKB). The recapitalisation is part of a process that should see KKB acquired by the second-largest bank, Halyk Bank (B/Rating Watch Negative). The authorities intend to narrow the budget deficit in 2018-2019 by ending the Nurly Zhol stimulus programme and reforming the tax code. Fitch expects deficit reduction to be supported by higher oil prices, and assumes no additional recapitalisation costs after 2017. The state's fiscal balance sheet is very strong, reflecting assets in the National Fund of the Republic of Kazakhstan (NFRK) of 45.8% of GDP at end-2016. Net government debt at end 2016 was -22.3% of GDP compared with a peer median of 33.1%. The NFRK will be used to partly finance the higher deficit in 2017, but Fitch expects its assets to remain above 30% of GDP over the forecast period. A new fiscal rule was introduced in December 2016 to reduce guaranteed transfers from the NFRK to the state budget from 2018. Commodity dependence is high (oil exports account for around half of current account receipts) and lower oil prices have pushed the current account deficit to 6.4% of GDP in 2016 (BBB median: -1.8%). Non-oil exports have not yet benefited from exchange rate depreciation given economic weakness in the main trading partners. External prospects are better for 2017 and 2018 due to an expected oil price recovery, but high FDI-related imports and income outflows will keep the current account in deficit over the forecast horizon. Fitch expects the deficit to be fully financed by FDI, which will remain strong as the USD37 billion Tengiz oil field expansion starts next year. External balance sheet metrics are very strong. The sovereign is a net external creditor (58.8% of GDP at end-2016 versus a BBB median of 2.9%) thanks to foreign assets of the NFRK and large FX reserves, accounting for around 18 months of current account payments. Net external debt of 22.9% of GDP at end-2016 is higher than the peer median of 0.5%, but mostly reflects FDI-related indebtedness in the energy sector; 63% of private sector gross external debt was intercompany debt at end-2016. Fitch estimates that net external debt will peak at end-2017 before declining to below 20% of GDP at end-2018 due to robust FDI and lower current account deficits. Given the low share of short-term external debt, Fitch's liquidity ratio is also very comfortable, above 300% at end-2016 (peer median 154.7%). Macro-financial risks have receded. The inflation targeting regime established in 2015 is gaining credibility. Inflation has fallen to within the 6%-8% target range, standing at 7.7% in March 2017, after overshooting in 2016 (8.5% at end-year), and the NBK intends to further strengthen its monetary policy framework. It has not intervened in the exchange rate market since September 2016, and the tenge slightly appreciated during the year. Deposit dollarisation, although still higher than the 'BBB' median at 54.6% at end-2016, is also declining, illustrating improved confidence in the currency. The banking sector is very weak, with a Fitch-defined Bank System Indicator of 'b'. The authorities appear committed to financial sector restructuring, as illustrated by the support to KKB and the intention to hold an asset quality review in 2018. At 6.7% of gross loans, official NPLs are moderate, but may significantly underestimate lightly provisioned restructured or distressed loans on most banks' balance sheets. Further recapitalisation needs may appear in the coming years, but Fitch would expect them to be manageable compared to the sovereign's assets. The economy continued adjusting to the 2015 exchange rate devaluation and lower oil revenues throughout 2016. Real GDP growth was 1.0% last year after 1.2% in 2015, supported by the government's countercyclical stimulus programme. Fitch expects real GDP growth to pick up to 2.2% in 2017 as oil output increases (the Kashagan oil field has restarted operations), FDI remains strong and the stimulus programme continues. However, even if rising oil output and energy-related FDI imply more favourable medium-term economic prospects, continued commodity dependence means macroeconomic volatility is likely to be higher than 'BBB' peers over the forecast horizon. Debt tolerance is compromised by weaker governance indicators, as measured by the World Bank. Constitutional amendments approved in March 2017 meant to hand over some of the president's wide-ranging powers to the government and parliament are unlikely to trigger a short-term improvement in governance indicators, in Fitch's view. SOVEREIGN RATING MODEL (SRM) and QUALITATIVE OVERLAY (QO) Fitch's proprietary SRM assigns Kazakhstan a score equivalent to a rating of 'BB+' on the Long-Term FC IDR scale. In accordance with its rating criteria, Fitch's sovereign rating committee decided not to adopt the score indicated by the SRM as the starting point for its analysis because, in the committee's view, the migration of the SRM output from 'BBB-' to 'BB+' is a temporary deterioration. Assuming an SRM output of 'BBB-', Fitch's sovereign rating committee adjusted the output to arrive at the final LT FC IDR by applying its QO, relative to rated peers, as follows: - Public finances: +1 notch, to reflect large government savings in the NFRK - External finances: +1 notch, to reflect high sovereign external assets - Structural Features: -1 notch, to reflect the weak condition of the banking sector Fitch's SRM is the agency's proprietary multiple regression rating model that employs 18 variables based on three year centred averages, including one year of forecasts, to produce a score equivalent to a LT FC IDR. Fitch's QO is a forward-looking qualitative framework designed to allow for adjustment to the SRM output to assign the final rating, reflecting factors within our criteria that are not fully quantifiable and/or not fully reflected in the SRM. RATING SENSITIVITIES The main factors that, individually or collectively, could trigger negative rating action are: - A further weakening in the sovereign external balance sheet - Materialisation of significant contingent liabilities above those already identified from the banking sector on the sovereign balance sheet - Policies that hamper fiscal consolidation or undermine monetary policy credibility The main factors that, individually or collectively, could trigger positive rating action are: - A sustained recovery in external and fiscal buffers - Steps to reduce the vulnerability of the public finances to future oil price shocks, for example by reducing the non-oil deficit - A sustained recovery in the economy supported by substantial improvements in the business environment and governance and greater diversification - Substantial improvement in the performance of the banking sector KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch assumes that Brent crude will average USD52.5/b in 2017 and USD55/b in 2018 Contact: Primary Analyst Amelie Roux Director +33 144 299 282 Fitch France SAS 60 rue de Monceau 75008 Paris Secondary Analyst Paul Gamble Senior Director +44 20 3530 1623 Committee Chairperson Stephen Schwartz Senior Director +852 2263 9938 Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: peter.fitzpatrick@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Country Ceilings (pub. 16 Aug 2016) here Sovereign Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Jul 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below