March 1, 2017 / 6:30 PM / 8 months ago

Fitch Affirms Validus' Ratings; Outlook Stable

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) CHICAGO, March 01 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Validus Holdings, Ltd. (Validus) Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A-'. Additionally, Fitch has affirmed the 'A' Insurer Financial Strength (IFS) rating of Validus Reinsurance, Ltd. (Validus Re). A full list of rating actions follows at the end of this release. The Rating Outlook is Stable. KEY RATING DRIVERS The ratings affirmation reflects the company's strong business profile with increasing diversity in the company's book of business, very strong operating performance on an absolute basis and relative to peers, and a modest decrease in peak probable maximum loss exposure relative to equity. These favorable factors are partially offset by potential volatility from large catastrophe-related events, recent deterioration in Western World Insurance Group (Western World) results, integration risk related to the recent acquisition of primary crop insurance general agent Crop Risk Services (CRS) and Fitch's negative sector outlook on global reinsurance and U.S. non-life insurance. Validus' business profile is characterized as 'Strong' by Fitch. Validus' maintains a broad product portfolio of reinsurance business along with an increasing business mix allocation to property/casualty primary specialty insurance business through subsidiaries Talbot Underwriting, Ltd. (Talbot) in the Lloyds market (Syndicate 1183) and Western World Insurance Group (Western World) in the U.S. Validus' AlphaCat segment represents a strategic advantage in the current competitive environment as it has grown to become one of the largest (re)insurer owned third-party ILS asset managers with $2.7 billion of assets under management as of Jan. 1, 2017. Validus reported a 3.6% increase in gross premiums written (GPW) in 2016 over the prior year. The increase in premiums is driven by the AlphaCat and Western World segments, somewhat offset by a decrease in GPW in the Validus Re and Talbot segments. The decline in GPW at Validus Re was primarily related to property catastrophe, marine and agriculture lines, while new casualty business served to offset some of the drop in premium in 2016. Profitability for Validus is very strong, characterized by a history of low and stable combined ratios and solid returns on average common equity (ROAE) as Validus has posted an underwriting profit and overall net income in every year of its operating history. In 2016, Validus posted a calendar-year combined ratio of 84.2%, up from 79.7% in 2015 and an ROAE of 9.8%, down from 10.4% in the prior year as the company reported modest increases in catastrophe losses and less favorable reserve development during the year. The Western World segment reported a combined ratio of 107.6% in 2016, up from 98.2% in the prior year as expenses related to policy acquisition increased. Validus' underlying performance remains in line with higher rated peers and Fitch's sector credit factors at higher rating categories. The most recent five-year averages (2012-2016) for combined ratio and ROAE are 78.3% and 11.6%, respectively. Fitch observes that the company's share of global catastrophe losses since its inception, while significant in some cases, has been manageable and catastrophe loss experience has not exceeded the company's modelled loss estimates. Per event 1-100 and 1-250-year PMLs on an occurrence basis for the U.S. wind peril remain among the highest within Validus' peer group at 19% and 27% of common shareholders' equity at Jan. 1, 2017 but remain within expectations for the current rating category. Validus' financial leverage ratio (FLR) is modest at 16.3% as of Dec. 31, 2016, down from 17.1% at year-end 2015. This decrease reflects a 7.5% increase in total shareholders' equity to over $4 billion at Dec. 31, 2016, as a result of strong net earnings and a $150 million preferred share issuance during the year. RATING SENSITIVITIES Key rating triggers that could result in an upgrade include: --Enhanced scale and relative competitive position with maintenance of current operating performance in the challenging reinsurance environment; --Profitable growth in the Western World segment including the CRS business with a combined ratio for the segment under 100%; --Maintaining favorable run-rate earnings and low volatility, with a combined ratio under 90%; --Net probable maximum loss (PML) to common equity ratios consistent with higher-rated reinsurance peers. Key rating triggers that could result in a downgrade include: --Deterioration in (re)insurance sector fundamentals or consolidation in the (re)insurance landscape that Fitch viewed as weakening Validus' competitive position, operating profile or overall profitability; --Sustained combined ratio above 103% or operating ratio above 95%; --An increase in Validus' 1-100 and 1-250-year peak per event catastrophe (PMLs) to 25% and 35% of common equity, respectively; --FLR in excess of 25% or fixed charge coverage ratios in the low single digits for a period of consecutive years; --Under Fitch's notching criteria, if more than 30% of Validus' earnings or capital is sourced from foreign entities outside of the Bermuda group solvency environment, Validus' holding company ratings could be lowered by one notch reflecting a ring-fencing environment classification; --Validus' hybrid securities ratings could be lowered by one notch to reflect non-performance risk should Fitch view Bermuda's regulatory environment as becoming more controlling in its supervision of (re)insurers. FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS Fitch has affirmed the following ratings with a Stable Outlook: Validus Holdings, Ltd. --Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'A-'; --$250 million of 8.875% senior unsecured notes due 2040 at 'BBB+'; --$150 million of 9.07% junior subordinated deferrable debentures due June 2036 at 'BBB'; --$140 million of 8.48% junior subordinated deferrable debentures due June 2037 at 'BBB'. --$150 million of 5.875% non-cumulative Series A preference shares at 'BBB'. Validus Reinsurance, Ltd. --IFS at 'A'. Contact: Primary Analyst Christopher A. Grimes, CFA Director +1-312-368-3263 Fitch Ratings, Inc. 70 W. Madison Street Chicago, IL 60602 Secondary Analyst Brian C. Schneider, CPA, CPCU, ARe Senior Director +1-312-606-2321 Committee Chairperson Jeff A. Mohrenweiser, FSA, CFA Senior Director +1-312-368-3182 Media Relations: Hannah James, New York, Tel: + 1 646 582 4947, Email: hannah.james@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Insurance Rating Methodology (pub. 15 Sep 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1019904 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below