July 4, 2017 / 9:35 AM / 17 days ago

Fitch: Armenian Banks Better Placed After Raising New Capital

12 Min Read

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Link to Fitch Ratings' Report: Armenian Banking Sector: Successfully Recapitalised, Challenges Ahead here MOSCOW/LONDON, July 04 (Fitch) Banks in Armenia are better positioned to meet challenges as capital levels have been boosted to comply with new regulations, Fitch Ratings said at its annual conference on Armenia in Yerevan today. The higher capital buffers should help to support credit growth and provide resilience against potential pressures on asset quality. The sector's capital adequacy ratio increased to 20% at end-1Q17 from 16.2% at end-2015 as lenders reacted to the introduction of a new capital floor on 1 January. (The minimum required ratio remains unchanged at 12%.) The capital floor was raised to AMD30 billion (about USD60 million) from AMD5 billion. This mostly affected small and mid-sized banks, triggering some mergers and acquisitions. The number of commercial banks operating in Armenia fell to 17 at end-1Q17 from 21 at end-2015 and we expect more consolidation, given modest returns on equity. The sector's net interest margin hit a record low of 4.3% in 2016, pressured by intense competition and limited credit growth. An improvement in profitability will largely depend on asset quality trends and banks' ability to grow. Credit growth picked up in 2016, reaching 15% compared to a 4% contraction in 2015. However, this was fuelled by two banks that expanded rapidly through cash-backed transactions, particularly in 4Q16. We expect new lending will be moderate in 2017, with credit demand yet to recover in line with macroeconomic trends. The economy recovered strongly in 1Q17 and Fitch projects 3.4% GDP growth in 2017. Growth could accelerate further in 2018-19 but medium-term growth will depend on progress in improving the investment climate, as total investment is low at 18.4% of GDP. The ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to gross loans improved to 6.8% at end-1Q17 from 9.7% at end-3Q16, reflecting the rapid lending growth in 4Q16 and balance sheet clean-ups prior to M&A deals. But loan impairment charges still amounted to a sizeable 68% of pre-impairment profits in 1Q17. Unreserved NPLs were a moderate 17% of capital at end-2016. We believe asset quality trends will be driven by the performance of the economy. Dollarisation has reduced, driven by the stabilisation of the exchange rate and helped by regulatory measures. But foreign-currency lending is still high (62% of total lending at end-1Q17), posing significant risks to asset quality metrics given the low proportion of naturally hedged borrowers. Foreign-currency lending is lower (36%) in the retail segment as most consumer finance loans are issued in local currency. Sector liquidity is good, partly due to high obligatory reserve requirements. At end-April 2017, the system's liquidity cushion covered 165% of demand deposits. The funding structure is broadly stable, with customer deposits accounting for about half of the sector's liabilities at end-1Q17. Most of these are retail deposits, which have proven to be relatively stable through the credit cycle. We rate three banks in Armenia: Ameriabank, Ardshinbank and ACBA-Credit Agricole, all at 'B+'/Stable. The ratings reflect the banks' solid domestic franchises and adequate financial profiles, but also the high dollarisation rates on both sides of their balance sheets, and exposure to the Armenian operating environment. The banks could be downgraded if there is a marked weakening in asset quality, resulting in lower earnings and capital pressures, without sufficient support being provided by shareholders. Improvements in the economy and the banks' financial metrics would be positive for their credit profiles. But upgrades are unlikely without an upgrade of the sovereign. We affirmed Armenia's 'B+'/Stable sovereign rating on 30 June. The presentation "Armenian Banking Sector: Successfully Recapitalised, Challenges Ahead" is available at www.fitchratings.com or by clicking the link above. Contact: James Watson Managing Director, Financial Institutions +7 495 956 6657 Fitch Ratings CIS Limited 26 Valovaya Street Moscow 115054 Alyona Agrenenko Associate Director, Financial Institutions +7 495 956 2409 David Prowse Senior Analyst, Fitch Wire +44 20 3530 1250 Media Relations: Julia Belskaya von Tell, Moscow, Tel: +7 495 956 9908, Email: julia.belskayavontell@fitchratings.com; Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: peter.fitzpatrick@fitchratings.com. The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below