Reuters logo
Fitch Downgrades Five South African Banks Following Sovereign Downgrade
April 11, 2017 / 5:33 PM / 5 months ago

Fitch Downgrades Five South African Banks Following Sovereign Downgrade

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Link to Fitch Ratings' Report: Fitch Downgrades Five South African Banks Following Sovereign Downgrade here LONDON, April 11 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has downgraded the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) of five South African banks to 'BB+' from 'BBB-'. The banks affected are Absa Bank Limited, FirstRand Bank Limited (FRB), Investec Bank Limited (IBL), Nedbank Limited (Nedbank) and Standard Bank of South Africa (SBSA). Fitch has also downgraded the Long-Term IDRs of four bank holding companies - Barclays Africa Group Limited (BAGL), Investec Limited (IL), Nedbank Group Limited (NedGroup) and Standard Bank Group Limited (SBG) to 'BB+' from 'BBB-'. All entities' Short-Term IDRs have been downgraded to 'B' from 'F3'. At the same time, Fitch has downgraded the Support Rating (SR) of the government-owned Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) to '3', from '2', while affirming its National Long-Term Rating at 'AA+(zaf)' with a Stable Outlook. The downgrades result from South Africa's sovereign Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency IDRs to 'BB+' from 'BBB-' (see 'Fitch Downgrades South Africa to 'BB+'; Outlook Stable', dated 7 April 2017 at www.fitchratings.com). The Outlooks on all banks' Long-Term IDRs are Stable, in line with the Outlooks on the sovereign's Long-Term IDRs. A full list of rating actions is in the rating action report above. KEY RATING DRIVERS IDRs and VRs The IDRs of the commercial banks (and their holding companies) are driven by their standalone creditworthiness, as defined by their respective Viability Ratings (VRs). The VRs have been downgraded to 'bb+' from 'bbb-', because of the banks' high exposures to sovereign risk, through large holdings of government securities, exposure to sovereign-owned enterprises and to the weakening operating environment. All banks have strong franchises, sound management and governance, and solid financial metrics, which keep their VRs at the level of the sovereign's Long-Term IDRs. However, their VRs are capped at the level of the sovereign's IDRs because the majority of the banking groups' operations are in South Africa and they have high exposure to domestic sovereign debt relative to capital. The deterioration in sovereign creditworthiness brings increased risks to the banking sector. Higher borrowing costs for the sovereign will translate into further pressure on economic growth, which is likely to result in deterioration of banks' financial metrics, in particular, asset quality, funding and liquidity, which is likely to have a knock-on effect on profitability and capital. Banks will have to build higher capital buffers to meet elevated risk in their operating environment to maintain their VRs. SUPPORT RATINGS AND SUPPORT RATING FLOORS The SRs and Support Rating Floors (SRFs) of Absa, FRB, IBL, Nedbank and SBG have been affirmed at '3' and 'BB-', respectively, which reflects a moderate probability of support from the South African authorities if needed. This considers some compression between the sovereign rating and the SRF of domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) as the ratings move down the scale. We consider all five banks to be D-SIBs, but all SRFs are two notches from the sovereign rating, which reflects the proposed enactment of resolution legislation in South Africa to recapitalise a failing bank, which would make it more likely that senior creditors would be "bailed in". Fitch continues to factor in a moderate degree of sovereign support propensity, as we believe that the South African authorities are likely to retain the flexibility to provide extraordinary support in the interest of financial stability. NedGroup's and BAGL's SRs of '4' reflect a limited probability of support from the institutions' respective parents, Old Mutual Plc (BBB+/Stable) and Barclays Plc (A/Stable). The SRs of both bank holding companies reflect the ultimate parents' good ability, but limited willingness, to support. The latter reflects the proposed sale of BAGL by Barclays and the separation of Nedbank from Old Mutual. It also reflects Fitch's expectation that the parents will continue to support the groups until completion of the respective sale and separation processes. The SRs and SRFs of IL and SBG are affirmed at '5' and 'No Floor', respectively, as Fitch believes that support from the authorities would not extend to holding companies. The SR of DBSA is downgraded to '3' from '2', reflecting the weaker ability of the South African authorities to provide support to the bank. Fitch believes that the authorities' propensity to support DBSA continues to be high. This considers its status as a development finance institution, with a clear mandate, incorporated by an Act of Parliament. NATIONAL RATINGS National Ratings reflect the creditworthiness of an issuer relative to the best credit and other entities in South Africa. The National Ratings of all commercial banks and their respective holding companies and DBSA have been affirmed as their creditworthiness relative to that of the sovereign and other rated entities has not changed. DBSA's National Long-Term Rating reflects a moderate probability of support from the South African authorities, if required. At 'AA+(zaf)' it reflects slightly lower perceived creditworthiness relative to the South African sovereign. SENIOR DEBT, SUBORDINATED DEBT AND HYBRID SECURITIES The senior unsecured debt program ratings of Absa, FRB, IBL, Nedbank and SBSA are equalised with the respective issuers' IDRs. Senior debt issued under these programs by FRB, IBL and Nedbank is also equalised with the respective issuers' IDRs. Therefore all Long- and Short-Term ratings for these programs and issues have been downgraded to 'BB+'. The National Long-Term senior unsecured debt program ratings of Absa, BAGL and FRB are equalised with the respective issuers' National Long-Term Ratings. Senior debt issued under these programs by FRB is also equalised with its IDRs. Therefore all Long- and Short-Term ratings for these programs and issues have been affirmed. The Long-Term ratings of subordinated debt issued by FRB and Nedbank are one notch below their respective VRs to reflect higher loss severity relative to senior debt. These issue ratings have therefore been downgraded to 'BB'. The National Long-Term ratings of subordinated debt issued by BAGL, FRB and IBL are one notch below their respective National Long-Term Ratings, also to reflect higher loss severity relative to senior debt. Therefore these issue ratings have been affirmed. The National Long-Term ratings of two legacy upper Tier 2 notes issued by FRB are notched three times from the bank's National Long-Term rating to reflect higher loss severity and non-performance risk. This issue rating has been affirmed. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS and VRs All commercial banks' IDRs are sensitive to a change in their respective VRs. An upgrade of the banks' VRs is only possible if the sovereign rating is upgraded. A further downgrade of the sovereign rating would result in a corresponding downgrade of the banks' VRs and Long-Term IDRs. In addition, all banks' Long-Term IDRs are sensitive to further weakening in their operating environment. This would most likely manifest in sharper than expected deterioration in asset quality that significantly affected earnings and capitalisation. In our view, given the increasing risks in the operating environment, banks require stronger capital bases and liquidity buffers to mitigate these risks. Therefore the banks' IDRs could be downgraded if their capital and liquidity buffers are not increased to meet elevated risks in the operating environment. All the banks' Long-Term IDRs are also sensitive to a tightening of liquidity, which could result from capital outflows and more limited access to wholesale funding. However, this is not Fitch's base case given banks' limited reliance on foreign wholesale funding and expectations of limited capital outflows from domestic investors. SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR The SRs and SRFs of Absa, FRB, Investec, Nedbank and SBSA are sensitive to a change in the willingness and ability of the authorities to support the banks. A further downgrade of the sovereign rating could result in a downgrade and downward revision of the banks' SRs and SRFs respectively. Fitch's view of a weaker propensity to support the banks is most likely to be triggered by clear statements of commitment to use resolution framework to resolve troubled banks in all scenarios. The SRs and SRFs of BAGL and NedGroup are sensitive to the completion of a significant part of the respective sale and separation processes by their parents, Barclays and Old Mutual, or clear statements from the parents that they will not provide extraordinary support, if required, during these processes. As holding companies, there is no upside for IL's and SBG's SR and SRF over the rating horizon. DBSA's Support Rating of '3' could withstand a further sovereign downgrade of up to two notches, indicative of further weakening in the ability of the authorities to support the bank. NATIONAL RATINGS A change in National Long-Term Ratings would stem only from a change in the respective banks' creditworthiness relative to the sovereign or other South African entities. For DBSA, this would be most likely to result from a change in Fitch's perception of the South African authorities' willingness to provide support if required. This could include public statements or actions indicating a decreased willingness to support. Conversely, an increased willingness to support could come from explicit, formalised support such as guarantees or increased callable capital. The ratings are also sensitive to strategic or corporate governance failings, which could undermine the bank's public mission. SENIOR DEBT, SUBORDINATED DEBT AND HYBRID SECURITIES The senior unsecured program ratings of Absa, FRB, IBL, Nedbank and SBSA and senior debt issued under these programs by FRB, IBL and Nedbank are sensitive to a change in the banks' respective IDRs. The National Long-Term senior unsecured program ratings of Absa, BAGL and FRB and senior debt issued by FRB are sensitive to a change in the banks' respective National Long- Term Ratings. The Long-Term ratings of subordinated debt issued by FRB and Nedbank are sensitive to a change in the banks' respective VRs. The National Long-Term ratings of subordinated debt issued by BAGL, FRB and IBL and FRB's legacy upper Tier 2 notes are sensitive to a change in the banks' respective National Long-Term Ratings. Contact: Primary Analyst Andrew Parkinson Director +44 20 3530 1420 Fitch Ratings Limited 30 North Colonnade London, E14 5GN Secondary Analyst Eric Dupont Senior Director +33 1 44 29 91 31 Committee Chair Bridget Gandy Managing Director +44 20 3530 1095 Media Relations: Peter Fitzpatrick, London, Tel: +44 20 3530 1103, Email: peter.fitzpatrick@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 07 Mar 2017) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below