June 28, 2017 / 7:20 PM / a month ago

Fitch Places Banco Original S.A. on Rating Watch Negative

14 Min Read

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) SAO PAULO, June 28 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has placed Banco Original S.A.'s (Original) Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs), National Ratings and Viability Rating (VR) on Rating Watch Negative (RWN). A full list of the actions taken is detailed at the end of this release. KEY RATING DRIVERS- IDRS, VR, NATIONAL RATINGS The RWN reflects the potential risks that Original could face over the short- and medium-term, as a result of recent and upcoming developments regarding the ongoing investigations of its related parties, which could have material negative implications for Original, although Fitch acknowledges this has not happened so far. These possibilities could put pressure on the bank's liquidity over the next few months and gradually increase its debt-refinancing risk, which continues to be well managed as of today. While not immediately impacted, continued negative developments from the investigations at its affiliates could also lead to gradual pressure on the bank's company profile and business model. The RWN also highlights downside risks in the event of Original being involved in the aforementioned investigations, although the bank has not been officially notified of any misconduct or wrongdoing thus far. Despite Original's sound and tested asset-liability management, currently strong cash position and relative operational independence from the group's activities, Fitch believes that the events surrounding its related parties could potentially hamper its ability to execute its strategic plans and meet its previously stated business goals, the cornerstone of which is the ramp-up of its digital retail franchise. Original is ultimately wholly owned by a holding company named J&F Investimentos S.A., which also controls its shareholders' other companies, including JBS S.A. (JBS; Long-Term IDR 'BB'/RWN). Last month, it was disclosed that some of JBS's executives had signed a plea bargain with the Brazilian Federal Public Prosecutor's Office, which included admitting payments of bribes to various politicians. Fitch reiterates that Original's liquidity so far has remained stable and has been adequately managed. The short-term profile of its loan portfolio, the relatively low proportion of funding with daily liquidity clauses (less than 10%), and the diversified retail portion of Original's funding distribution agreements (covered by FGC) have been critical and sufficient, so far, to ease potential pressures on Original's financial profile. However, concentration per broker/distributor remains high, which could add vulnerability to Original's refinancing ability, if part of these distributors decides to reduce their exposure to Original, or even cancel the ongoing agreements. The top-5 largest investors (all agreements with local securities companies, which, in turn, distribute Original's funding instruments), represented roughly 57% of the bank's funding base as of December 2016. Fitch also expects the bank's strategy execution to be further tested in the future. It is likely that funding costs will gradually increase and revenue generation could be hurt, as lending activity should also be cautiously managed until there is a clearer view of its funding stability. So far, there has been no major reputational impact of the affiliates' events on Original's retail brand. Yet, Fitch understands that the bank could still become increasingly exposed to the developments of the investigations. Should investor confidence worsen, the bank's implementation of its initial business goals and achieving breakeven in 2019 would likely be delayed. These additional challenges arose in a moment when the bank was still aiming to further consolidate its overall franchise, and improve profitability, which remains weak due to its significant investments in the digital banking segment. As of December 2016, the bank's operating loss amounted to BRL331.4 million or -3.6% of its Risk Weighted Assets (positive 1.1% in 2015), while its relative capital cushion has continued declining on the back of sustained growth and weak performance, although still remains adequate, in Fitch's view. Support Rating and Support Rating Floor Original's SR and SRF were affirmed at '5' and 'NF', respectively, in view of the bank's low systemic importance. In Fitch's view, external support cannot be relied upon. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS, VR AND NATIONAL RATINGS Original's ratings could be downgraded if the current negative pressures surrounding its business and financial profile drive a significant weakening of the bank's liquidity and funding profile, refinancing risk is increases materially very soon, or its profitability and capital adequacy metrics further weaken substantially. The direct involvement of the bank in the scope of the ongoing investigations may also result in a downgrade, a scenario in which the rating downside potential could eventually be multi-notch. The ratings could be affirmed and removed from RWN in the following months if Fitch is comfortable that refinancing risks are considerably reduced and that any potentially negative implications arising from the investigations on its related parties are comfortably absorbed without material negative implications for Original. In such a scenario, the resulting Rating Outlook will depend on Fitch's assessment of the medium-term prospects for the bank's business and financial profile. SR and SRF A potential upgrade of Original's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor is unlikely in the foreseeable future, since this would arise from a material gain in systemic importance. Fitch has placed the following ratings on Rating Watch Negative: --Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs 'B+'; --Short-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs 'B'; --Viability Rating 'b+'; --National Long-Term Rating 'BBB+(bra)'; --National Short-Term Rating 'F2(bra)'. The following ratings were affirmed: --Support Rating at '5'; --Support Rating Floor at 'NF'. Contact: Primary Analyst Raphael Nascimento Associate Director +55-11 3957-3664 Fitch Ratings Brasil Ltda., Alameda Santos, 700 - 7th floor, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Secondary Analyst Esin Celasun Director +55-21 4503-2626 Committee Chairperson Alejandro Garcia, CFA Managing Director +1-212-908-9137 Media Relations: Elizabeth Fogerty, New York, Tel: +1 (212) 908 0526, Email: elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 25 Nov 2016) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 07 Mar 2017) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below