Reuters logo
10 months ago
Fitch Affirms Regions Financial Corporation's IDRs at 'BBB/F2'; Outlook Revised to Positive
October 4, 2016 / 6:36 PM / 10 months ago

Fitch Affirms Regions Financial Corporation's IDRs at 'BBB/F2'; Outlook Revised to Positive

20 Min Read

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) CHICAGO, October 04 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Regions Financial Corporation (RF)'s ratings at 'BBB'/'F2' reflecting the company's good capital and liquidity profile, improving earnings, and continued improvement in asset quality. The Rating Outlook has been revised to Positive from Stable. The rating action follows a periodic review of the large regional banking group, which includes BB&T Corporation (BBT), Capital One Finance Corporation (COF), Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG), Comerica Incorporated (CMA), Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB), Huntington Bancshares Inc. (HBAN), Keycorp (KEY), M&T Bank Corporation (MTB), MUFG Americas Holding Corporation (MUAH), PNC Financial Services Group (PNC), Regions Financial Corporation (RF), SunTrust Banks Inc. (STI), US Bancorp (USB), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC), and Zions Bancorporation (ZION). Company-specific rating rationales for the other banks are published separately, and for further discussion of the large regional bank sector in general, refer to the special report titled 'Large Regional Bank Periodic Review,' to be published shortly. KEY RATING DRIVERS IDRs, VRs, AND SENIOR DEBT The affirmation reflects RF's good capital and liquidity profile. Fitch views greater upside in RF's ratings, and has revised the Rating Outlook to Positive to reflect RF's improving overall credit profile. An upgrade would be predicated on closing the gap with higher rated peers in terms of profitability and asset quality. Fitch observes that profitability to date still lags the peer average, but on a risk-adjusted basis, Fitch views the earnings profile as more in line with peer averages. Earnings also incorporate a fairly resilient margin, which compares favorably to the peer median. RF maintains relatively lower deposit costs, with loan yields around 16bps better than the peer median. Further, RF has higher energy-related exposure, particularly to oilfield services companies, than peers, which is expected given its operating footprint. Despite a higher exposure to energy than peers, Fitch views the risk as manageable, and RF has demonstrated success in lowering this exposure with appropriate reserves. RF's capital profile remains good with an estimated fully phased-in Common Equity Tier 1 ratio under Basel III of approximately 11% at June 30, 2016, around 20bps higher than the peer median. Fitch expects these capital levels will diminish over time, but will remain above peer averages over the near term given CCAR-related capital distribution constraints, the lack of strong organic balance sheet growth, and bank M&A restrictions. RF has publicly stated its long-term CET1 target is 9.5%. Fitch views RF's capital planning practices as solid, and are informed by appropriate triggers and limits. Fitch expects RF to operate above its long-term target over the near term given the lack of balance sheet growth. RF expects to grow loans less than 3% for the year. Fitch notes that a higher relative capital target is important in light of weaker capital generation capabilities than peers. RF's liquidity profile remains solid with a low loan-to-deposit ratio, at 84% at quarter-end, and one of the lowest of the large regional peer group. This may provide RF more flexibility in funding loan growth under a more robust economic environment. Loan growth over the past year for RF has been muted at roughly 2%. This is viewed favorably by Fitch given the competitive lending environment. Some of this loan growth was due to a market slowdown, while the other half was attributed to RF's self-imposed decision to slow lending in certain sectors, including CRE, where RF is approaching internal concentration limits. Further, RF is also de-emphasizing credit-only relationships. Fitch notes that while multi-family and owner-occupied CRE balances are down from a year ago, RF continues to grow indirect auto and credit card balances. These portfolios comprise 5% and 1% of total loans, respectively, mitigating some of the risk inherent in the relatively robust loan growth in these loan types amidst relatively sluggish economic growth. Fitch notes at June 30, 2016, 0.48% was more than 60 days past due in the indirect auto book, and only 9% has a FICO score less than 620. Fitch views RF's deposit franchise as a rating strength, especially in light of its higher growth footprint. RF has a very low cost of funds, and stands to benefit from higher than average population growth expectations given its Southeastern footprint. While depositor behavior under a higher interest rate environment is difficult to predict, RF's franchises in Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee in particular, where the company holds either the number 1 or number 2 market shares, may prove more resilient to pressures of higher deposit costs, and aid the company's earnings profile. RF's ratings are currently constrained by asset quality. At June 30, 2016, RF's NPAs were the highest of the peer group due primarily to commercial, particularly energy-related, and CRE nonaccrual loans. Fitch believes RF's TDR accounting practices to be more conservative than peers, and notes that 86% of accruing TDRs are current as of June 30, 2016. Current loan losses remain low and at the peer median in 2Q16, though Fitch expects them to deteriorate from unsustainably low levels, in part due to RF's energy-related portfolio. RF reported $3.1 billion in total energy-related exposure at June 30, 2016, or around 3.8% of the total loan book, on the higher end of peer averages. Despite some improvement in oil prices from a year ago, Fitch expects some weakness particularly from its oilfield services portfolio, which represents approximately 36% of energy outstandings, which is higher than its peers. RF has built its energy reserves to 9.4% at June 30, 2016, the second highest level among its peer banks. Further, RF has been very successful in reducing direct exposure, down 19% from a year ago. Fitch views energy-related risk as an earnings headwind for RF, and not necessarily a capital issue. RF anticipates that it will incur between $50 million and $75 million in related losses throughout 2017, and if prices average below $25 a barrel through the end of 2017, RF could experience additional losses of $100 million. At June 30, 2016, RF had $225 million in energy-related reserves against the potential stress losses of up to $175 million through year-end 2017. Given current prices are averaging around $44 a barrel; realizing this level of losses appears remote. Fitch expects that RF may benefit from some reserve releases in this book over time. In 4Q15, RF was assigned a "needs to improve" CRA rating, despite receiving "High Satisfactory" ratings on the CRA components. RF's CRA rating was downgraded due to the bank's April 2015 consent order with the CFPB related to overdrafts and Regulation E. Regions Bank had self-reported these matters, and provided refunds to the affected customers in 2011 and 2012. Nonetheless, the current CRA rating means the bank will be unable to pursue bank acquisitions until the CRA rating is upgraded. RF expects its next CRA rating will occur in 2016, but the timing of the exam or the results is unclear. The bank's inability to pursue M&A is not viewed as a credit negative. SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES RF's subordinated debt is notched one level below its VR of 'bbb' for loss severity. RF's preferred stock is notched five levels below its VR, two times for loss severity and three times for non-performance. These ratings are in accordance with Fitch's criteria and assessment of the instruments non-performance and loss severity risk profiles and have thus been affirmed due to the affirmation of the VR. LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS The uninsured deposit ratings of Regions Bank are rated one notch higher than RF's IDR and senior unsecured debt because U.S. uninsured deposits benefit from depositor preference. U.S. depositor preference gives deposit liabilities superior recovery prospects in the event of default. HOLDING COMPANY RF's IDR and VR are equalized with those of its bank, reflecting its role as the bank holding company, which is mandated in the U.S. to act as a source of strength for its bank subsidiaries. Ratings are also equalized reflecting the very close correlation between holding company and subsidiary failure and default probabilities. SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR RF has a Support Rating of '5' and Support Rating Floor of 'NF'. In Fitch's view, RF is not systemically important and therefore, the probability of support is unlikely. IDRs and VRs do not incorporate any support. RATING SENSITIVITIES VR, IDRs, AND SENIOR DEBT An upgrade of RF's ratings would be driven by the improvement and maintenance of core earnings at peer levels combined with a continued reduction in problem asset levels. Fitch expects the resolution of the rating outlook to be on the latter part of the 12 to 24 month rating horizon as earnings improvement may be difficult to achieve over the next twelve months given the low-rate interest environment. If overall asset quality continues to modestly improve and further deterioration in RF's energy book is not outsized relative to the performance of peers, this may be consistent with an upgrade. However, if RF's energy portfolio performs noticeably worse than peers, ratings upside may be impacted. Conversely, a sustained reversal of moderating credit trends, combined with a large decrease in capital, would likely cause the outlook to be revised back to Stable. Fitch expects it will take some time to manage its capital down to its long-term capital target of CET1 of 9.5% given CCAR constraints and subdued organic loan growth expectations. Since RF cannot participate in bank M&A given its CRA rating, if RF were to become much more aggressive with its capital distribution plans under CCAR or began to materially grow its balance sheet, its ratings could be adversely impacted. Similar to some of its large regional bank peers, RF is continuing to build out its capital markets capabilities. While these businesses can result in much more volatile earnings, Fitch expects that capital markets revenues will remain low relative to total revenues for RF. Outsized growth or contribution from capital markets-related revenues may impede upwards rating momentum. SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES The ratings for RF and its operating companies' subordinated debt and preferred stock are sensitive to any change to RF's VR. LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS The long-and short-term deposit ratings are sensitive to any change to RF's Long-and Short-Term IDR. HOLDING COMPANY Should RF's holding company begin to exhibit signs of weakness, demonstrate trouble accessing the capital markets, or have inadequate cash flow coverage to meet near-term obligations, there is the potential that Fitch could notch the holding company IDR and VR from the ratings of the operating companies. SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR Since RF's Support and Support Rating Floors are '5' and 'NF', respectively, there is limited likelihood that these ratings will change over the foreseeable future. Fitch has affirmed the following ratings: Regions Financial Corporation Long-Term IDR at 'BBB'; Outlook Revised to Positive; Short-Term IDR at 'F2'; Subordinated debt at 'BBB-'; Viability rating at 'bbb'; Senior unsecured at 'BBB'; Preferred stock at 'B+'; Support at '5'; Support floor at 'NF'. Regions Bank Long-Term IDR at 'BBB'; Outlook Revised to Positive; Long-Term deposits at 'BBB+'; Short-Term deposits at 'F2'; Short-Term IDR at 'F2'; Senior debt at 'BBB'; Subordinated debt at 'BBB-'; Viability Rating at 'bbb'; Support at '5'; Support floor at 'NF'. AmSouth Bancorporation Subordinated debt at 'BBB-'. Contact: Primary Analyst Julie Solar Senior Director +1-312-368-5472 Fitch Ratings, Inc. 70 West Madison Chicago, IL 60602 Secondary Analyst Bain Rumohr Director +1-312-368-3153 Committee Chairperson Christopher Wolfe Managing Director +1-212-908-0771 Media Relations: Hannah James, New York, Tel: + 1 646 582 4947, Email: Additional information is available on Applicable Criteria Global Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 15 Jul 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here _id=1012639 Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ail=31 ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below