October 6, 2016 / 5:16 AM / 10 months ago

Fitch Assigns Jubilant Pharma's USD Notes Final 'BB' Rating

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) SINGAPORE/MUMBAI, October 06 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has assigned Singapore-based Jubilant Pharma Limited's (JPL, BB-/Stable) USD300m 4.875% senior unsecured notes due in 2021 a final rating of 'BB'. The final rating is in line with the expected rating assigned on 23 September 2016, and follows the receipt of final documents conforming to information already received. JPL will use the proceeds from the note issue mainly to repay existing debt and contribute up to USD50m to its parent Jubilant Life Sciences Limited (JLS) to repay part of the parent's indebtedness. The notes represent direct, unconditional, unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company. KEY RATING DRIVERS Weaker Consolidated Profile: JPL's IDR is based on its parent JLS's consolidated profile, given Fitch's assessment of moderate linkage between JPL and its parent, which Fitch assesses to have a weaker credit profile than its subsidiary. JLS's life science ingredients business has strong positions in some of products, such as pyridines, acetyls and niacinamide, and its backward integration gives it a cost advantage compared to some of its peers. However, Fitch believes cash flows from the life science business are more vulnerable, given the commodity nature of products, intense competition and the inherent cyclicality of the business. Bond Rated above IDR: JPL's bondholders will have direct recourse to JPL's cash flows and assets. The rating on the bond is above the IDR to reflect reduced secured debt at JPL after it uses proceeds from the issue to refinance a portion of secured debt currently on JPL's balance sheet. Following this refinancing, we expect the ratio of JPL's secured and prior-ranking debt to EBITDA to reduce to below 2x, which is commensurate with Fitch's guidelines for low structural subordination. The indenture of the bond restricts the amount of prior-ranking debt that JPL can have. Robust Growth Prospects in Radiopharma: JPL's Draximage business is the fourth-largest participant by sales in the small North American nuclear imaging market. Draximage faces very limited competition for some of its top products, such as MAA, an albumin injectable used in lung imaging, and DTPA, a pentetate injectable used for brain and kidney imaging, both of which have no competitors at present. Draximage has expanded strongly in the last few years and is poised to grow further with a healthy pipeline of products. JPL aims to launch Ruby Fill, an infuser device used for heart imaging, in the second half of the financial year ending 31 March 2017 (FY17), following its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) in October 2016. Ruby Fill has significant patient safety-related advantages over a competitor's existing alternative. Ruby Fill is the first new product due to be launched in this segment in nearly 25 years, and there are no known competitors. JPL estimates the market size for Ruby Fill at about USD70m. Adequate Pipeline for Generics: JPL's generics formulations and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) business is primarily focused on the key regulated markets of US and Europe, with adequate off-patent Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) filings to counter competitive pressure on its existing portfolio. JPL has so far filed 73 ANDAs and 81 Drug Master Files (DMFs) in the US as at 30 June 2016, of which 46 ANDAs have been approved and 34 DMFs have been reviewed. Healthy Orders for Contract Manufacturing: The contract manufacturing order book stood at USD534m as of 30 June 2016, or 6.4x of FY16 revenue in this segment, following the successful resolution of violations of USFDA standards at its contract manufacturing plants in 2014-2015. JPL's contract manufacturing (CMO) business mainly produces injectable and other sterile products for the North American markets. The business is driven by patented products (nearly 80% of sales), and customers, which are mainly large pharmaceutical companies, are primarily focused on quality standards rather than costs alone. Regulatory Risk in Pharma: JPL and its peers face regulatory risks associated with non-compliance with cGMP (current Good Manufacturing Practice) norms stipulated by the USFDA. However, the risks are more pronounced in JPL's case given its small size and its smaller number of production facilities. The USFDA in December 2013 issued a warning to JPL for lapses found at the company's main contract manufacturing facility in Spokane, US. The company managed to resolve the violations identified in the warning letter at the Spokane facility in a reasonable time frame of about 15 months and has demonstrated it is proactive in meeting quality compliance. This is reflected in USFDA inspections at all the company's six manufacturing facilities in the US during FY16 that did not find any lapses. JPL took steps to improve quality and management has become more proactive about maintaining standards as part of the resolution of the USFDA issues. We believe this should minimise the risk from future quality concerns. Exposure to Commodity Prices: JLS is focused on products that are essentially commodities in nature, with realised prices and margins closely linked to crude-oil-based derivatives or substitutes and to demand and supply in the industry. The risk is more pronounced in chemical products at the lower end of the value chain, such as products in the life science ingredients business (ethanol and ethyl acetate) and advance intermediate segments (primarily pyridine). Low crude oil prices and industry overcapacity have led to weak operating trends in the life sciences business and are likely to limit any material improvement in the near to medium term. However, JLS's integrated business model provides it with some flexibility in shifting to products with better market fundamentals. For example, it stepped up production of specialty chemicals, which drove improvement in profitability in FY16. Consolidated Financial Profile to Improve: JLS's FFO adjusted net leverage and FFO fixed charge coverage were 3.8x and 3.2x, respectively in FY16. We expect JLS's credit metrics to improve due to the expected growth in the pharmaceuticals business, a good degree of capex flexibility and moderate dividend payouts, which should enable it to generate positive free cash flows. Fitch expects the company to focus on expansion in segments with favourable demand, such as contract manufacturing, API and certain specialty ingredients. Currently, JPL's plant utilisation levels are at 60%-70% across most segments, which provide it with some operational and capex flexibility. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer include: - JLS revenue growth of around 4% in FY17 and 11%-13% after that, supported by new launches in the radiopharma and generic formulations businesses. Growth in the life sciences business to remain muted, reflecting weak commodity prices - EBITDA margin to remain stable at close to 20% in FY17, before improving as the pharma business grows. Weak commodity prices and demand-supply imbalance in the speciality chemicals segment to limit improvement in life sciences margins - Capex of nearly INR3.2bn in FY17. No material growth in capex after that - Dividend payout to remain at less than 15% of net income RATING SENSITIVITIES Positive: Fitch does not anticipate any positive rating action in the near term given the challenges faced by JLS's life sciences business, which will limit the improvement in the credit profile of JLS. However, future developments that may, individually or collectively lead to positive rating action include: - Sustained improvement in the operating profile of the life sciences business; - Sustained free cash flow generation; and - FFO adjusted gross leverage sustained at less than 2.5x (FY16: 4.1x). Negative: Future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to negative rating action include: - Volatility in free cash flow generation due to a weak operating environment in life sciences or adverse USFDA actions - Deterioration in FFO adjusted gross leverage to more than 4.5x LIQUIDITY JLS has adequate liquidity with cash balance of INR3.4bn and undrawn credit facilities of INR5.7bn at 31 March 2016, which are sufficient to cover the INR7.4bn of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months. The debt maturity profile is reasonably balanced with less than INR7.5bn in annual debt maturities after FY17. The liquidity profile is further supported by Fitch's expectation of positive free cash flow in FY17 and proceeds from the note issuance, which will be used to repay debt within JPL. Contact: Primary Analyst Akash Gupta Associate Director +65 6796 7242 Fitch Ratings Singapore Pte Ltd 6 Temasek Boulevard 35-05 Suntec Tower Four Singapore 038986 Secondary Analyst Snehdeep Bohra Associate Director +91 22 4000 1732 Committee Chairperson Vicky Melbourne Senior Director +612 8256 0325 Date of Relevant Rating Committee: 22 September 2016 Media Relations: Bindu Menon, Mumbai, Tel: +91 22 4000 1727, Email: bindu.menon@fitchratings.com; Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email: leslie.tan@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Corporate Rating Methodology - Including Short-Term Ratings and Parent and Subsidiary Linkage - Effective from 17 August 2015 to 27 September 2016 (pub. 17 Aug 2015) here Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage (pub. 31 Aug 2016) here Additional Disclosures Solicitation Status here Endorsement Policy here ail=31 ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below