LONDON, June 23 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Leading shoe and designer clothing labels including Nike and Puma have made progress in tackling forced labour in their leather supply chains but could do more to address the issue at tanneries and ranches providing hides, according to a study.
It raised particular concern over China’s largest shoe retailer, Belle International, which failed to provide any information on its leather supply chain in a survey and made no commitments for improvements.
The survey of five footwear and five luxury clothes brands was done by KnowTheChain, a resource for businesses and investors wanting to address forced labour within their supply chains.
It said information from the 10 companies generally revealed very little on how - apart from auditing suppliers - they addressed forced labour risks in countries which produce hides, process leather and manufacture leather goods.
But it singled out Adidas for praise, saying the German sportswear manufacturer had trained tanneries in Taiwan and China on how to deal with forced labour risks, and was taking steps to address risks at hide suppliers in Brazil and Paraguay.
Belle, which sells both its own brands and international brands, could not immediately be reached for comment.
Poor working conditions in leather supply chains have been well documented over the years, with evidence from countries like Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India revealing abusive practices including child labour, the study said.
It noted that workers at shoe factories in China - the world’s largest footwear producer - had reported being forced to work overtime. Punishments for those who refused included having allowances docked or demotion.
The study said forced labour was a significant problem on cattle ranches in Brazil, the world’s largest hide-producing country, with young men ending up in debt bondage after being brought to plantations by labour brokers.
“We believe that all companies in our case study either source or potentially source hides from Brazil and/or produce leather goods in China, thus are exposed to countries where we know forced labour risks are the greatest,” the report said.
However, it said footwear brands were generally making headway, partly because of increased scrutiny.
Nike, the largest of the five footwear companies, was praised for leading the way in disclosing information on the workforce in its supply chains.
The study also highlighted Puma’s grievance mechanisms set up for workers at suppliers in China, which include an SMS service and another via a popular social media network.
KnowTheChain called on companies to join forces to eradicate forced labour across leather supply chains, and suggested they collaborate with industries outside the sector such as meat companies and other users of leather like the car industry. (Reporting by Emma Batha; Editing by Astrid Zweynert @azweynert.; Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, which covers humanitarian news, women’s rights, trafficking, corruption and climate change. Visit news.trust.org to see more stories.)