October 16, 2017 / 4:41 AM / 4 months ago

Fitch Affirms AIS at 'BBB+'/'AA+(tha)', AWN at 'AA+(tha)'

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) SYDNEY/BANGKOK, October 16 (Fitch) Fitch Ratings has affirmed Thailand-based telecommunications company Advanced Info Service Public Company Limited's (AIS) Long-Term Foreign- and Local-Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) at 'BBB+' with a Stable Outlook. The agency has also affirmed its National Long-Term Rating at 'AA+(tha)' with a Stable Outlook and National Short-Term Rating at 'F1+(tha)'. At the same time, Fitch has affirmed subsidiary Advanced Wireless Network Company Limited's (AWN) National Long-Term Rating at 'AA+(tha)' with a Stable Outlook. A full list of rating actions is at the end of this commentary. KEY RATING DRIVERS High Investment, Low Rating Headroom: Fitch expects the rating headroom of mobile-phone operator AIS, headquartered in Bangkok, to remain low in 2017 and 2018 due to high capex and spectrum payments. We forecast AIS's free cash flow (FCF) will be negative as cash flow from operations is unlikely to cover capex and dividend payouts. We estimate AIS's FFO adjusted net leverage will stay around 2.0x in 2017 and 2018 (end-1H17: 1.8x). More Rationalised Competition: Fitch expects price competition in the Thai telecom sector to stabilise in 2H17 and 2018 as operators shift their focus to profitability rather than market share, and scale down their handset subsidies. Since 1Q17, AIS and Total Access Communication Public Company Limited (DTAC; BBB/AA(tha)/Stable) have been reducing their handset subsidies and offering subsidies only on post-paid plans. We expect True Corporation Public Company Limited's mobile unit (True Mobile) to reduce its handset subsidies for the pre-paid segment in 2H17, after having passed DTAC in service revenue market share in 1Q17. Earnings Recovery: Fitch expects AIS's operating EBITDAR to improve strongly to around THB72 billion in 2017 from THB63 billion in 2016, led mainly by the reduction in its handset subsidy expense. Marketing expense (including handset subsidies) as a percentage of AIS's service revenue dropped significantly to 8% in 1H17 from 14% in 2016. In addition, AIS's earnings should benefit from the cut in the universal service obligation (USO) fee in May 2017 to 2.5% of licence holders' service revenue from 3.75%. In 1H17, AIS's EBITDAR margin improved to 46% from 41.4% in 2016. Data Supports Revenue Growth: Fitch expects AIS's service revenue (excluding interconnection charges) to grow by around 5%-6% in 2017. This should be supported by continued growth in mobile-data usage and a growing fixed-broadband subscriber base. Fitch forecasts AIS's mobile-service revenue to grow moderately at around 3%-4%, as strong growth in non-voice services will be partly offset by a decline in voice revenue, while fixed-broadband revenue is likely to increase significantly to around THB2.5 billion in 2017 from THB860 million in 2016. Leading Market Position: AIS has maintained its leading market position as the largest mobile-phone operator in Thailand by service revenue in the past several years. Fitch believes AIS should be able to maintain its service-revenue market share of around 50% in the medium term (2016: 49%). AIS benefits from economies of scale due to its large subscriber base. AIS's market position is also supported by its strong brand and extensive network coverage. AIS-AWN Ratings Equalised: AWN's ratings are equalised with those of AIS to reflect the strong links between the two companies, in line with Fitch's Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage criteria. AIS fully owns AWN and controls its management and operations. AWN was awarded 2.1GHz and 1.8GHz licences and won the auction for the 900MHz spectrum in May 2016. AWN is of strategic importance to its parent as the operator of AIS's licensed business. DERIVATION SUMMARY AIS's credit profile is supported by its strong market position as the largest mobile-phone operator in Thailand and its conservative financial profile. AIS is rated higher than its domestic peer, DTAC, due to the latter's smaller size, weaker market position and lower profit margin. DTAC's ratings incorporate a one-notch uplift from the linkages with its parent, Telenor ASA of Norway, which has strong board and management control of DTAC. AIS's credit profile is comparable to the Philippines' largest telecom operator, PLDT Inc. (PLDT, BBB/AAA(phl)/Stable). Both are the largest telecom operators in their respective markets. Although PLDT has higher financial leverage than AIS, PLDT's business profile is stronger due to its more diversified telecom services, which include both fixed-line and mobile services. KEY ASSUMPTIONS Fitch's key assumptions within our rating case for the issuer include: - Mid-single digit service revenue growth in 2017 and 2018 - Operating EBITDAR margin to improve to 45%-47% in 2017 and 2018 (2016: 41.4%) due to lower handset subsidies and a reduction in the USO fee - THB40 billion-45 billion a year for network capex in 2017 and 2018 (2016: THB47.6 billion) - Payment for acquisition of internet-service provider CS Loxinfo in 2018 - 70% dividend payout ratio RATING SENSITIVITIES AIS Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action -Positive FCF and an operating EBITDAR margin above 45%, both on a sustained basis Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action -FFO adjusted net leverage rises above 2.0x on a sustained basis or -Unfavourable regulatory changes AWN Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action -Positive rating action on AIS, provided that the linkages between AIS and AWN do not weaken Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action -Negative rating action on AIS LIQUIDITY Manageable Liquidity: AIS's liquidity should be manageable even though FCF is likely to be negative in 2017. Its liquidity should be supported by a cash balance of THB11.2 billion and available committed bank facilities of THB8.1 billion at end-2016, which should be enough to cover short-term debt of THB11.6 billion at end-2016. Its ability to access the local debt market should also provide liquidity to support the likely negative FCF in 2017. FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS Advanced Info Service Public Company - Long-Term Foreign-Currency IDR affirmed at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable - Long-Term Local-Currency IDR affirmed at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable - National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'AA+(tha)'; Outlook Stable - National Short-Term Rating affirmed at 'F1+(tha)' Advanced Wireless Network Company Limited - National Long-Term Rating affirmed at 'AA+(tha)'; Outlook Stable - National Short-Term Rating affirmed at 'F1+(tha)' - National senior unsecured rating affirmed at 'AA+(tha)' Contact: Primary Analyst Steve Durose (International ratings) Managing Director +612 8256 0307 Fitch Australia Pty Ltd Level 15, 77 King Street Sydney NSW 2000 Obboon Thirachit (National ratings) Director +66 2 108 0159 Fitch Ratings (Thailand) Limited Level 17, Park Ventures, 57 Wireless Road, Lumpini, Patumwan Bangkok 10330 Secondary Analyst Obboon Thirachit (International ratings) Director +66 2 108 0159 Nichaya Seamanontaprinya (National ratings) Associate Director +66 2 108 0161 Committee Chairperson Sajal Kishore Senior Director +61 2 8256 0321 Summary of Financial Statement Adjustments - Construction income and cost from the agreements for operations are excluded from EBITDA calculation - Other income is excluded from EBITDA calculation. Note to editors: Fitch's National ratings provide a relative measure of creditworthiness for rated entities in countries with relatively low international sovereign ratings and where there is demand for such ratings. The best risk within a country is rated 'AAA' and other credits are rated only relative to this risk. National ratings are designed for use mainly by local investors in local markets and are signified by the addition of an identifier for the country concerned, such as 'AAA(tha)' for National ratings in Thailand. Specific letter grades are not therefore internationally comparable. For regulatory purposes in various jurisdictions, the supervisory analyst named above is deemed to be the primary analyst for this issuer; the principal analyst is deemed to be the secondary. Media Relations: Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 67 96 7234, Email: leslie.tan@fitchratings.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Corporate Rating Criteria (pub. 07 Aug 2017) here National Scale Ratings Criteria (pub. 07 Mar 2017) here Parent and Subsidiary Rating Linkage (pub. 31 Aug 2016) here Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form here Solicitation Status here#solicitation Endorsement Policy here ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: here. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE here. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2017 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch’s factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch’s ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided “as is” without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below